Sensorimotor Block Dynamics and Hemidiaphragmatic Palsy: Selective Trunk Block vs Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

April 9, 2025 updated by: Prof Manoj K Karmakar, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Sensorimotor Block Dynamics and Hemidiaphragmatic Palsy: A Randomized Superiority Trial Comparing Selective Trunk Block and Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB) has been extensively studied and recommended as a sole anesthetic for upper extremity surgeries. The efficacy of ultrasound-guided (USG) SeTB for surgical anesthesia of the entire upper extremity and cadaver anatomic study evaluating the spread of the injectate after a simulated SeTB is further confirmed from the results of our previous research. Although the results in our previous study are encouraging, there is a paucity of data on sensorimotor blockade and incidence of hemidiaphragmatic palsy after a SeTB, and no data comparing SeTB with a supraclavicular BPB techniques which this study aims to evaluate. We hypothesise that USG SeTB is superior to supraclavicular BPB in anesthetising the entire upper extremity from the shoulder to hand.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB) has been extensively studied and recommended as a sole anesthetic for upper extremity surgeries. The supraclavicular BPB is often touted to be the 'spinal of the upper extremity' as it produces anesthesia of the entire upper extremity except for the T2 dermatome.

However, based on clinical experience, such a claim is grossly unsubstantiated. This is evident from the finding that supraclavicular BPB is associated with 2-36% inferior trunk or ulnar nerve sparing. In addition, since the suprascapular nerve takes off more proximally from the superior trunk and the supraclavicular BPB is performed distally at the supraclavicular fossa, the effect of supraclavicular BPB on the suprascapular nerve, which predominantly supply the shoulder and proximal humerus, is not known and has not been objectively documented.

Nonetheless, supraclavicular BPB has been successfully used for shoulder surgery albeit with a large local anesthetic (LA) volume (50-60 ml) or combined with interscalene BPB, a hybrid BPB technique using 30-50 ml LA volume, for proximal humerus fracture surgeries. But such high LA volume is invariably associated with potential complications in the high risk population and therefore not used in contemporary clinical practice.

Since all major nerves supplying the upper extremity, including suprascapular nerve, passes through the trunks of the brachial plexus, we proposed that by selectively identifying and blocking the three trunks of the brachial plexus with small doses of LA-selective trunk block (SeTB), it is feasible to produce anesthesia of the entire upper extremity, i.e., from shoulder to hand. This is further confirmed from the results of our research evaluating the efficacy of ultrasound-guided (USG) SeTB for surgical anesthesia of the entire upper extremity and cadaver anatomic study evaluating the spread of the injectate after a simulated SeTB. Although these are encouraging results, there is a paucity of data on the sensorimotor blockade and incidence of hemidiaphragmatic palsy comparing SeTB and supraclavicular BPB techniques which this study aims to evaluate. We hypothesize that USG SeTB is superior to supraclavicular BPB in anesthetizing the entire upper extremity from shoulder to hand.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories,
        • Contact:
          • Manoj K Karmakar, MD
        • Contact:
          • Angel Cheung, RN, BN, MSc
          • Phone Number: +85255696157

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA 1-3 patients
  • Undergoing elective or emergency upper extremity surgery involving anywhere from the proximal humerus to distal hand or surgery involving any combination of these regions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • Pregnancy
  • Skin infection at the site of block placement
  • History of allergy to local anaesthetic (LA) drugs
  • Bleeding tendency or with evidence of coagulopathy
  • Pre-existing respiratory disease
  • Neurological deficit or neuromuscular disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Selective Trunk Block (SeTB)
Patient who scheduled an upper extremity surgery involving anywhere from the proximal humerus to distal hand or surgery involving any combination of these regions and randomized in SeTB group will receive a SeTB.It will be performed through two skin punctures and as three separate injections to the three trunks of the brachial plexus.
Patient will lie supine on the examination couch with the ipsilateral arm in the neutral position (adducted), neck slightly extended and the head turned slightly to the contralateral side. After local anesthetic (LA) infiltration (1-2 ml lidocaine 1%), the nerve block needle will be inserted and placed within the interscalene groove. Then, a 7 ml of a 1:1 mixture of lidocaine 2% with 1:200,000 epinephrine and levobupivacaine 0.5% will be slowly injected in aliquots. After that, the tip will be redirected lateral to the middle trunk. A further 8 ml of the LA mixture will be injected after which the nerve block needle will be completely withdrawn. The transducer will then be manipulated to a sub-omohyoid position. After LA infiltration, the nerve block needle is inserted in-plane until the needle tip is positioned close to and lateral to (9-12 o'clock position) the inferior trunk. A 10 ml of the LA mixture is injected in small aliquots and the needle will be removed after the injection.
Active Comparator: Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block (SC BPB)
Patient who scheduled an upper extremity surgery involving anywhere from the proximal humerus to distal hand or surgery involving any combination of these regions and randomized in SeTB group will receive a SC BPB. It will be performed using a single ultrasound window demonstrating the trunks and divisions of the brachial plexus in a superolateral position relative to the subclavian artery at the supraclavicular fossa.
Patient will lie supine on the examination couch with the ipsilateral arm in the neutral position (adducted), neck slightly extended and the head turned slightly to the contralateral side. Patient will receive a subcutaneous infiltration with 1-2 ml of 0.9% normal saline (NS) at the superior and middle trunk level after which the needle will be completely withdrawn. Then, a local anesthetic (LA) infiltration (1-2 ml lidocaine 1%) will then be performed at the supraclavicular fossa and the nerve block will be inserted in-plane to place the needle tip at the corner pocket. After that, 15-ml of a 1:1 mixture of lidocaine 2% with 1:200,000 epinephrine and levobupivacaine 0.5% will be slowly injected in aliquots. Once completed, the needle tip is gently withdrawn and redirected into the cluster formed by the divisions of brachial plexus. Then, the remaining 10-ml of the same LA mixture will be injected in small aliquots and the needle will be removed after the injection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Readiness for surgery (Change of sensory and motor function from baseline to blockade)
Time Frame: Within 45 minutes after the block at 5 minutes interval

When the patient is able to achieve a composite score of 20 out of 22 with a sensory blockade score of at least 9 out of 10.

Sensory blockade:Loss of sensation to cold stimulus (ice cube) in the cutaneous distribution of the median, radial, ulnar, musculocutaneous and axillary nerves will be tested.Graded using a 3-points scale: 0 = able to feel touch and cold, 1= feel touch but not cold, 2 = feel neither touch nor cold.

Motor blockade:The median, radial, ulnar, musculocutaneous, axillary and suprascapular nerves will be assessed.Graded using a 3-points scale: 0 = no block, 1 = paresis and 2 = paralysis.

Within 45 minutes after the block at 5 minutes interval
Change of ipsilateral Hemidiaphragmatic (phrenic nerve) function from baseline to 30 minutes after SeTB
Time Frame: Before and 30 minutes after SeTB
Reduction in diaphragmatic excursion of more than 75% of baseline, or no movement, or paradoxical movement will be considered as complete paresis. Reduction in diaphragmatic excursion of between 25% and 75% will be considered as partial paresis and diaphragmatic excursion of less than 25% will be considered as 'no paresis. Each test will be performed 3 times, and values will be averaged.
Before and 30 minutes after SeTB

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete sensory block
Time Frame: Within 45 minutes after the block at 5 minutes interval

Sensory blockade score of at least 9 out of 10. Loss of sensation to cold stimulus (ice cube) in the cutaneous distribution of the median, radial, ulnar, musculocutaneous and axillary nerves will be tested.

Graded using a 3-points scale:

0 = able to feel touch and cold, 1= feel touch but not cold, 2 = feel neither touch nor cold.

Within 45 minutes after the block at 5 minutes interval
Motor blockade
Time Frame: Within 45 minutes after the block at 5 minutes interval

Motor blockade of the suprascapular nerve, median, radial, ulnar, musculocutaneous, axillary and suprascapular nerves will be assessed.

Graded using a 3-points scale:

0 = no block, 1 = paresis and 2 = paralysis.

Within 45 minutes after the block at 5 minutes interval
Any occurrence of paradoxical movement
Time Frame: Within 45 minutes after the block
Any paradoxical movement after the block will be documented.
Within 45 minutes after the block
Block performance time
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes after entering the procedure room
The time taken from the start of the local anaesthetic (LA) skin infiltration to the end of the LA injection for the block.
Within 30 minutes after entering the procedure room
Any occurrence of paresthesia
Time Frame: Immediately after the end of the block
Any paresthesia experienced during the block will be assessed and recorded as a 'yes' or 'no' response.
Immediately after the end of the block
Discomfort score
Time Frame: Immediately after the end of the block]
Discomfort experienced during the regional anesthesia using a numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 to 100, 0=no discomfort, 100=extreme discomfort)
Immediately after the end of the block]
Any occurrence of symptomatic dyspnea
Time Frame: During and within 45 minutes after the block
Any dyspnea experienced during and after the block will be assessed and recorded as a 'yes' or 'no' response.
During and within 45 minutes after the block
Name and dosage of used rescue analgesia
Time Frame: During surgery
Any rescue intravenous analgesic requirements during surgery will be documented with name and dosage.
During surgery
Total amount of local anesthetic infiltration used
Time Frame: During surgery
Any rescue LA infiltration requirements during surgery will be documented.
During surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Manoj K Karmakar, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions

Clinical Trials on Selective Trunk Block (SeTB)

Subscribe