Checklists Resuscitation Emergency Department

December 5, 2022 updated by: Region Skane

Clinical Use of an Emergency Manual by Resuscitation Teams and Impact on Performance in the Emergency Department

The study will systematically evaluate how an emergency manual-a collection of checklists and fact sheets-affects the performance of resuscitation teams during the management of priority one patients in an emergency department.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Simulation-based studies indicate that crisis checklist use improves management of patients with critical conditions in the emergency department (ED). This six-month-long study prospectively evaluates a digital emergency manual-a collection of crisis checklists and fact sheets-during the management of priority 1 patients in the Skåne University Hospital at Lund's ED.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consecutive priority 1 patients managed in the resuscitation room of Skåne University Hospital at Lund's Emergency Department

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients managed with Emergency Manual access
Consecutive priority 1 patients managed by resuscitation teams with access to an Emergency Manual
Collection of crisis checklists and fact sheets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of indication of interventions performed thanks to Do-Confirm Emergency Manual use
Time Frame: 1 hour
The primary outcome measures are the proportions of interventions performed thanks to Do-Confirm EM use graded as indicated, of neutral relevance, and not indicated.
1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Team's subjective evaluation of Emergency Manual value
Time Frame: 1 hour
The team's subjective evaluation of the EM's value is recorded prior to the logging out from the EM using a Likert scale of 1 to 6.
1 hour
Degree of indication of interventions that might have been performed had the Emergency Manual been used
Time Frame: 1 hour
Fifty patients that presented during the six-month period preceding EM implementation, are identified. These 50 patients are selected based on matching to the 50 patients where the EM was used, using age, presenting complaint and relevant co-morbidities. In addition, fifty patients where the EM was not used during the pilot study period are also identified based on the same matching process. The EM is accessed to determine whether additional interventions would have been performed, had the EM been used. All interventions-those actually performed as well as those that might have been performed had the EM been used-are then assessed for degree of indication by three external reviewers.
1 hour
Structured interviews
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks

Teams can electronically request contact with the investigators to report specific events related to EM use. If so, the following data is extracted during a structured interview:

  • patient age, sex, presenting complaint and suspected diagnosis
  • seniority of the physician initially in charge of the case
  • events or concerns relating to EM use
  • mode of EM use (Do-Confirm, Read-Do, Sampling) and sections relevant to the case
  • personnel's assessment of the impact of the EM on patient care
  • personnel's assessment of impact of the EM on team members and teamwork
  • personnel's suggestions for EM improvement
Up to 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric Dryver, MD, Skane's University Hospital in Lund, Emergency Department

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on Emergency Manual

Subscribe