Orem's Self-Care Deficit Theory Based Nursing Interventions for Immunotherapy Treated Cancer Patients

April 28, 2023 updated by: Mevlüde Ergen, Akdeniz University

The Effect of Orem's Self-Care Deficit Theory Based Nursing Interventions on Symptom Management, Care Needs and The Quality of Life of Immunotherapy Treated Cancer Patients

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of nursing interventions based on Orem Self-Care Deficiency Theory on symptom management, care needs and quality of life in cancer patients who underwent immunotherapy.

Method: The research was planned as a randomized controlled trial. The research is planned to be carried out in the Medical Oncology unit of the Health Sciences University Antalya Training and Research Hospital. It is planned to be done with 58 patients, 29 experimental and 29 control groups. Based on Orem Self-Care Deficit Theory; face-to-face patient education, giving patient education booklet, preparation of symptom management card, face-to-face and telephone counseling initiatives were planned. Patient Description Form, Supportive Care Needs Scale-Short Form, Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Scale and Self-Care Strength Scale will be used to collect data.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Antalya, Turkey, 07058
        • Recruiting
        • Akdeniz University
        • Contact:
          • Antalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Coming to Antalya Training and Research Hospital Medical Oncology unit for treatment,
  • First time taking one of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (Ipilimumab CTLA-4, Pembrolizumab PD-1, Nivolumab PD-1, Atezolizumab PDL-1),
  • Speaking and understanding Turkish,
  • Being literate,
  • 18 Years and older
  • With solid tumor,
  • No communication barrier
  • Being able to communicate by phone
  • Individuals who agree to participate in the research.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving other cancer treatments in combination with immunotherapy,
  • Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale 4.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
Experimental: Immuno-SelfCare
In this study, face-to-face patient education, giving patient education booklet, preparation of symptom management card, face-to-face and telephone counseling initiatives were planned to the experimental group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Symptom on the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and 12th week
Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS): The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale is a multidimensional self-report questionnaire that evaluates 32 physical and psychological symptoms according to their frequency, severity and distress/bother to the person in the past week.The total score is the average of the responses to the distress scale items and and ranges from 0 to 4 with higher values indicating greater distress experienced from symptoms.
Baseline and 12th week
Change from Baseline in Supportive Care Needs on the Supportive Care Needs Scale-Short Form at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and 12th week
Supportive Care Needs Scale-Short Form: The 31-item instrument measures supportive care needs in five domains: health system and information, psychological needs, physical and daily living, patient care and support, and sexual-related. Responses are given on a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 = no help is needed and 5 = high need for help. Total scores range from 31 to 155 and higher scores indicate greater need for help.
Baseline and 12th week
Change from Baseline in Self-Care Strength on the Self-Care Strength Scale at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and 12th week
Self-Care Strength Scale: A maximum score of 140 is taken from the scale. The high score obtained from the scale indicates the high level of self-care or self-care ability and power of the individual.
Baseline and 12th week
Change from Baseline in Quality of Life Level on the EORTC QLQ-C30 Quality of Life Scale(European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire) at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and 12th week
EORTC QLQ-C30 Quality of Life Scale(European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire): This Scale was developed to measure the quality of life of patients with cancer. It includes 30 questions and three sub-dimensions: General Well-Being, Functional Difficulties, and Symptom Control. The maximum score on the scale is 100, and the minimum is 0. High scores on the functional sub-dimension indicate good/healthy functional status, high scores on the symptom sub-dimension indicate high levels of symptoms and/or problems, and high scores on the global health status/quality of life sub-dimension indicate good quality of life.
Baseline and 12th week
Change from Baseline in Adverse Events on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 for 12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline,for 12 weeks
NCI-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0: These algorithms provide support for prescribing the necessary treatment for grade 1 and grade 2 adverse events and for creating special care plans for grade 3 and 4 adverse events.
Baseline,for 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Fatma Arikan, Akdeniz University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

3
Subscribe