- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05652764
Orem's Self-Care Deficit Theory Based Nursing Interventions for Immunotherapy Treated Cancer Patients
The Effect of Orem's Self-Care Deficit Theory Based Nursing Interventions on Symptom Management, Care Needs and The Quality of Life of Immunotherapy Treated Cancer Patients
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of nursing interventions based on Orem Self-Care Deficiency Theory on symptom management, care needs and quality of life in cancer patients who underwent immunotherapy.
Method: The research was planned as a randomized controlled trial. The research is planned to be carried out in the Medical Oncology unit of the Health Sciences University Antalya Training and Research Hospital. It is planned to be done with 58 patients, 29 experimental and 29 control groups. Based on Orem Self-Care Deficit Theory; face-to-face patient education, giving patient education booklet, preparation of symptom management card, face-to-face and telephone counseling initiatives were planned. Patient Description Form, Supportive Care Needs Scale-Short Form, Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Scale and Self-Care Strength Scale will be used to collect data.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Mevlüde Ergen
- Phone Number: +905364560116
- Email: ergenmevlude@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Antalya, Turkey, 07058
- Recruiting
- Akdeniz University
-
Contact:
- Antalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Coming to Antalya Training and Research Hospital Medical Oncology unit for treatment,
- First time taking one of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (Ipilimumab CTLA-4, Pembrolizumab PD-1, Nivolumab PD-1, Atezolizumab PDL-1),
- Speaking and understanding Turkish,
- Being literate,
- 18 Years and older
- With solid tumor,
- No communication barrier
- Being able to communicate by phone
- Individuals who agree to participate in the research.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients receiving other cancer treatments in combination with immunotherapy,
- Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale 4.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Control Group
|
|
Experimental: Immuno-SelfCare
|
In this study, face-to-face patient education, giving patient education booklet, preparation of symptom management card, face-to-face and telephone counseling initiatives were planned to the experimental group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change from Baseline in Symptom on the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and 12th week
|
Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS): The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale is a multidimensional self-report questionnaire that evaluates 32 physical and psychological symptoms according to their frequency, severity and distress/bother to the person in the past week.The total score is the average of the responses to the distress scale items and and ranges from 0 to 4 with higher values indicating greater distress experienced from symptoms.
|
Baseline and 12th week
|
Change from Baseline in Supportive Care Needs on the Supportive Care Needs Scale-Short Form at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and 12th week
|
Supportive Care Needs Scale-Short Form: The 31-item instrument measures supportive care needs in five domains: health system and information, psychological needs, physical and daily living, patient care and support, and sexual-related.
Responses are given on a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 = no help is needed and 5 = high need for help.
Total scores range from 31 to 155 and higher scores indicate greater need for help.
|
Baseline and 12th week
|
Change from Baseline in Self-Care Strength on the Self-Care Strength Scale at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and 12th week
|
Self-Care Strength Scale: A maximum score of 140 is taken from the scale.
The high score obtained from the scale indicates the high level of self-care or self-care ability and power of the individual.
|
Baseline and 12th week
|
Change from Baseline in Quality of Life Level on the EORTC QLQ-C30 Quality of Life Scale(European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire) at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and 12th week
|
EORTC QLQ-C30 Quality of Life Scale(European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire): This Scale was developed to measure the quality of life of patients with cancer.
It includes 30 questions and three sub-dimensions: General Well-Being, Functional Difficulties, and Symptom Control.
The maximum score on the scale is 100, and the minimum is 0. High scores on the functional sub-dimension indicate good/healthy functional status, high scores on the symptom sub-dimension indicate high levels of symptoms and/or problems, and high scores on the global health status/quality of life sub-dimension indicate good quality of life.
|
Baseline and 12th week
|
Change from Baseline in Adverse Events on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 for 12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline,for 12 weeks
|
NCI-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0: These algorithms provide support for prescribing the necessary treatment for grade 1 and grade 2 adverse events and for creating special care plans for grade 3 and 4 adverse events.
|
Baseline,for 12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Fatma Arikan, Akdeniz University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- KAEK- 685
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Children's National Research InstituteRecruitingProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaRecruitingImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
Mattu UniversityCompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life ofEthiopia
-
University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)RecruitingHealth Related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
PharmanexSprim Advanced Life SciencesCompletedHealth-related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Institute of Oncology LjubljanaUnknownHealth-related Quality of LifeSlovenia