- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05656976
Efficacy of Offering a Self-sampling Device by the GP to Reach Underscreened Women (ESSAG)
Efficacy of Offering a Self-sampling Device by the General Practitioner to Reach Women Underscreened in the Routine Cervical Cancer Screening Program Compared to Sending Reminder Letters by the Screening Organization
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Sara Willems, prof. dr.
- Phone Number: +32 9 332 39 84
- Email: sara.willems@ugent.be
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ghent, Belgium, 9000
- Recruiting
- Ghent University
-
Contact:
- Kaatje Van Roy
-
Principal Investigator:
- Kaatje Van Roy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- women between 31-64 years old
- living in Flanders
- eligible for the Flemish actions with regard to population screening
- without a smear registered in the Belgian Cancer Registry in the last 6 years
- registered as GMD patient in one of the participating GP practices
Exclusion Criteria:
- hysterectomy
- pregnancy
- (past) diagnosis of cervical cancer
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: B Self sampling device provided by letter
A self sampling device will be provided by letter.
|
In the second arm, a second group of 45 GP practices in Flanders will be recruited.
With the intervention of the Centre for Cancer Prevention (Flanders), 25 at randomly selected long-term unscreened women with a Global Medical Form (in dutch: 'Globaal Medisch Dossier, GMD) in one of these practices will receive an envelope containing a letter of invitation from their GP for cervical cancer screening, a brochure with the advantages and disadvantages of cervical cancer screening and more specifically the use of a self-taking kit, and a self-taking kit.
If the woman wishes, she can use the kit when and where it suits her and send it to the lab with the pre-paid envelope.
As in arm A, the woman will be informed of the Human Papilloma Virus test result by her GP according to the usual way in the practice (e.g., by letter, by phone or during the next consultation).
All women will receive a study-related reminder letter after 4 months.
|
Experimental: A Self sampling device (SSD) provided by the general practitioner (GP)
A self sampling device will be provided by the GP.
|
In a group of 45 GP practices, over a course of 9 months, all long-term unscreened women with a GMD will be addressed by their GP when they consult for any reason.
The GP will discuss the pros and cons of screening for cervical cancer, the various options for screening for cervical cancer including the possibility of using a SSD.
For this, the GP can use on accessible brochure and video materials.
After the woman agrees, she is given a self-taking kit that she can use when and where it suits her and send it to the lab with the prepaid envelope.
The woman is informed of the result of the Human Papilloma Virus test result by her GP according to the usual way in the practice (e.g. via letter, by phone or during the next consultation).
|
No Intervention: C (control arm) Recommendation letter
Following the usual care procedure, a random sample of 1125 Flemish women who meet the same inclusion criteria as in arm A and B and are not included in one of the latter arms is drawn by "Centrum voor Kankeropsporing" (CvKO) from Heracles, the database of the Flemish screening program.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Response rate
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
|
Age-standardised response rates in each arm and the differences between arms will be calculated, in a per protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. As the goal is to reveal to what extent the respective approach (providing a self sampling device (SSD) with different levels of general practitioner (GP) involvement) succeeds in reaching vulnerable women, analyses will take into account a comprehensive list of covariates by logistic regression accounting for cluster effects. These covariates include trial arm, GP-office characteristics, as well as demographic information of the patient on origin and socio-economical background provided by the "Kruispuntbank voor Sociale Zekerheid (KSZ)". |
Up to 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Participation rate
Time Frame: Up to 9 months
|
The participation rate will be calculated from arm A to answer questions at public health level, i.e. the population effect of the intervention by GP's on increasing cervical cancer screening coverage in underscreened women. For participation rate, the denominator are all women who belong to the target group for that specific GP-office (women between 31-64y, not screened within 6y, etc). |
Up to 9 months
|
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Time Frame: Up to 15 months
|
A cost-effectiveness analysis will also be performed, addressing the additional number of women screened per 1,000€ in interventions A and B versus control intervention C.
|
Up to 15 months
|
Feasibility analysis (semi-structured interviews with GP's)
Time Frame: Up to 4 months after the intervention in their practice
|
In order to explore the potential roll-out of the study within the Flemish screening programme, the investigators will also perform a feasibility study.
Through interviews with 20-30 GPs who participated in arm A, a feasibility analysis will reveal the strengths and pitfalls of the intervention.
|
Up to 4 months after the intervention in their practice
|
Response rate (follow-up cytology test)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
|
Although this study is not powered for inter-arm differences in follow-up after an abnormal screening test result, compliance analysis will be performed with the following indicators: screen-test positivity rates, proportion with invalid screen-test results, proportion of screen-test positives that have the foreseen follow-up tests.
|
Up to 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kaatje Van Roy, University Ghent
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neoplasms
- Urogenital Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Uterine Neoplasms
- Genital Neoplasms, Female
- Uterine Cervical Diseases
- Uterine Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Genital Diseases, Female
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ONZ-2022-0250
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cervical Cancer
-
University of California, San DiegoWithdrawnCervical Cancer | Cervical Cancer Stage | Cervical Cancer Stage IB2 | Cervical Cancer Stage IB1 | Cervical Cancer Stage I | Cervical Cancer Stage IB | Cervical Cancer Stage II | Cervical Cancer Stage IIa | Cervical Cancer, Stage IIB | Cervical Cancer, Stage III | Cervical Cancer Stage IIIB | Cervical Cancer... and other conditionsUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterWithdrawnStage IB3 Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage II Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIA Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIA1 Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIA2 Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIB Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage III Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIIA Cervical Cancer FIGO... and other conditions
-
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of PennsylvaniaWithdrawnCervical Cancer | Stage IB Cervical Cancer | Stage IIA Cervical Cancer | Stage IIB Cervical Cancer | Stage III Cervical Cancer | Stage IVA Cervical Cancer
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedCervical Adenocarcinoma | Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Stage IB Cervical Cancer | Stage IIA Cervical Cancer | Stage IIB Cervical Cancer | Stage III Cervical Cancer | Stage IVA Cervical Cancer | Stage IVB Cervical CancerUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingCervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma | Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Not Otherwise Specified | Recurrent Cervical Carcinoma | Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage II Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIA Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIA1 Cervical Cancer FIGO 2018 | Stage IIA2 Cervical... and other conditionsUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingStage IA Cervical Cancer | Stage IB Cervical Cancer | Stage IA1 Cervical Cancer | Stage IA2 Cervical Cancer | Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer | Stage IB2 Cervical Cancer | Stage IB3 Cervical CancerUnited States
-
Shanghai First Maternity and Infant HospitalNot yet recruitingCervical Cancer, Stage IIB | Cervical Cancer Stage IIIB | Cervical Cancer Stage IIIA | Cervical Cancer, Stage IVA
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Cervical Cancer | Stage IVA Cervical Cancer | Stage IVB Cervical Cancer | Stage IIIA Cervical Cancer | Stage IIIB Cervical CancerUnited States
-
Gynecologic Oncology GroupNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedCervical Adenocarcinoma | Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Stage IB Cervical Cancer | Stage IIA Cervical Cancer | Stage IIB Cervical Cancer | Stage III Cervical Cancer | Stage IVA Cervical CancerUnited States
-
Institut de Cancérologie de LorraineCompletedCervical Adenocarcinoma | Stage IB Cervical Cancer | Stage III Cervical Cancer | Stage II Cervical CancerFrance
Clinical Trials on Provision of self sampling device by the GP
-
The Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine...Cancer Research Czech RepublicRecruitingCervical Cancer | Human Papillomavirus Infection | Cervical DysplasiaCzechia
-
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de BellvitgeInstitut Català d'Oncologia; Institut Català de la Salut; Complejo Hospitalario...RecruitingCervical Cancer Screening | HPV-Related Cervical Carcinoma | Self-samplingSpain
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentCompletedMemory Disorders | Delirium, Dementia, Amnestic, Cognitive DisordersNetherlands
-
Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand ParisCompletedBreast CancerFrance
-
National Maternity Hospital, IrelandCompletedLabouring Parturients Requiring/Requesting Epidural Analgesia as Part of Their Peri-partum CareIreland
-
Radboud University Medical CenterMcGill University; Erasmus Medical Center; ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation... and other collaboratorsCompletedLung Diseases, ObstructiveNetherlands
-
AGIR à DomAIR LIQUIDE MEDICAL SYSTEMSNot yet recruiting
-
University Hospitals, LeicesterCompletedHip Fractures | Blood Lactic Acid IncreasedUnited Kingdom
-
Karl Landsteiner Institute for Clinical Epilepsy...AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH; Brainhero GmbHRecruiting
-
JhpiegoBotswana Ministry of HealthCompletedCervical Cancer | Human Papillomavirus InfectionBotswana