Latarjet vs Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction

August 20, 2024 updated by: Ivan Wong, MD, Nova Scotia Health Authority

Latarjet vs Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction for Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability With Glenoid Bone Loss: a Prospective Multi-centre Randomized Trial

Anterior shoulder dislocations occur when the humeral head translates anterior to the glenoid cause pain, stiffness, and glenoid bone loss. If left untreated, the risk of recurrence can be up to or greater than 90%. The only surgically modifiable factor to reduce the risk of recurrence is the glenoid bone loss (GBL), where surgeons have the ability to recreate the shape of the glenoid and reduce the risk of recurrent shoulder dislocations.

Established boney procedures for shoulder instability include the Latarjet and free bone block procedures, such as the Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction (AGR). The Latarjet is well known for its lower rate of recurrent instability, but raises concerns due to under-appreciated complications rates. The AGR is a newer surgical approach that has garnered attention for its low rate of recurrent instability and complication profile. Both treatments can reduce pain, increase function following surgery and reduce the risk of recurrent instability. However, these two established approaches have yet to be directly compared and studied on a larger scale.

The purpose of this randomized control trial is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes pre- and post-operatively between the Latarjet to the AGR.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Anterior shoulder dislocations are painful and highly prevalent. If left untreated, rates of recurrence can be up to and greater than 90%. The risk of recurrence room is increased with younger age (< 40), male sex, hyperlaxity, participation in contact sports, and GBL. From these factors, GBL is the only modifiable factor and surgical intervention is required. Managing the bone deficiency for instances of shoulder instability has proven to be a surgical challenge.

Established boney procedures for shoulder instability include the open and arthroscopic Latarjet and open and arthroscopic free bone block interventions. Latarjet is considered the gold standard for treating anterior shoulder instability with bone loss, where the coracoid process is cut and transferred with the conjoin tendon through the subscapularis. The coracoid process is then fixed to the anterior glenoid increasing glenohumeral surface area and stability by the addition of the sling effect. Latarjet has proven to result in low recurrent instability but raises concerns due to underappreciated complication rates (15-30%). The arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction (AGR) with distal tibia allograft is an arthroscopic bone block procedure that has recently garnered attention for its low rate of recurrent instability and complications, high levels of patient satisfaction and avoidance of splitting the subscapularis tendon. AGR with a distal tibia uses a new far medial portal, (i.e., Halifax portal) to avoid damaging the neurovascular or musculature while allowing for anatomic repair of the glenoid.

This randomized control trial will compare the gold standard Latarjet to the AGR. This study aims to randomize 68 individuals who experience anterior shoulder instability with GBL. Through a series of clinical and radiographic outcome measures, the study investigators hypothesize the AGR group will demonstrate smaller complication rates, but remain a similar post-operative recurrence rate, and patient reported outcomes. This trial will be the first multi-centre control trial evaluating the Latarjet to the AGR for patients with critical bone loss (>20%). This research has the potential to demonstrate clinical efficacy of a procedure that is safer, more anatomic, with less damage to the subscapular muscle, and an easier revision surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 2E1
        • Recruiting
        • Nova Scotia Health QEII Halifax Infirmary
        • Contact:
          • Sarah Remedios, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 36 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with one or more instances of anterior shoulder dislocation; pre-operative CT scan illustrating >20% bone loss.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • posterior shoulder instability; multidirectional shoulder instability; massive rotator cuff teats (MRI proven); history of substance abuse, patients unable to provide informed consent, patients refusing randomization.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Latarjet
The Latarjet involves the use of a auto-graft to be fixated to the anterior portion of the glenoid to recreate the size of the glenoid.
For patients randomized to the active comparator group, the coracoid process and conjoined tendon will be cut and transferred to the anterior rim of the glenoid through an incision in the subscapularis muscle.
Experimental: Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction
An allograft will be used for the patients in this group, inserted through a new portal and fixed to the anterior rim of the glenoid to recreate the size of the glenoid.
For the experimental group, a distal tibia allograft will be prepped, cut (20mm x 10mm x 15mm), and inserted into the anterior aspect of the shoulder through a far medial portal. The distal tibia allograft will be attached to the anterior glenoid using cannulated screws. A soft tissue repair, Bankart repair, is performed above the graft.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complication reporting
Time Frame: 2 years
Complications reported any time from surgery to post-surgery will be compared.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrent Instability
Time Frame: 2 years
The rate of recurrent instability, dislocation and/or subluxation will be compared up until 2 years following surgery.
2 years
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) Assessment Form
Time Frame: 1 and 2 years
Pain and function questionnaire for patients with shoulder injury. The scores will be out of 100, and a higher score equates to a better score.
1 and 2 years
Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) Index
Time Frame: 1 and 2 years
Physical symptoms, emotions, and lifestyle questionnaire specific to patients with shoulder instability. The scores will be out of 100 and a lower score equates to a better outcome.
1 and 2 years
EQ5D-5L
Time Frame: 1 and 2 years
Includes 5 questions on mobility, self care, pain, usual activities and psychological status, a summary index is used to derive the outcomes, where a score of 1 indicates the best health. This questionnaire includes a visual analog scale, to indicate overall health out of 100. A score of 100 indicates the best health.
1 and 2 years
Radiographic measure - subscapularis muscle volume
Time Frame: 1 year
Subscapularis muscle volume will be measured radiographically before and after surgery in millilitres.
1 year
Radiographic measure - graft resorption
Time Frame: 1 year
Radiographic analysis of the amount of resorption seen by the graft will be analyzed. This will be measured as a percentage of the original graft size.
1 year
Radiographic measure - glenoid size
Time Frame: 1 year
This will be the graft size before and after insertion of the graft measured in millimetres.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ivan Wong, MD, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Orthopaedic Surgeon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bone Loss

Clinical Trials on Coracoid Transfer

Subscribe