Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment With Peloidotherapy and Aquatic Exercise.

January 7, 2023 updated by: Seçil ÖZKURT, Istanbul Arel University

The Effectiveness of Peloidotherapy and Aquatic Exercise in Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment.

The aim was to observe the short and medium term effects of peloidotherapy and aquatic exercise applications in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common musculoskeletal diseases in the world. It is a non-inflammatory chronic disease that starts from the articular cartilage and is characterized by mechanical wear and cartilage loss in the joints, and includes findings such as joint pain, stiffness, and limitation of movement. Its incidence increases with aging. OA is more common in the spine, hip, hand and knee joints. The knee, which is a load-bearing joint, is more affected. Knee osteoarthritis is one of the most common causes of disability. It is more common in women. The prevalence of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in adults over the age of 55 was found to be 13% In the treatment guidelines, aquatic exercise and balneotherapy are among the recommendations for knee OA. Balneotherapy is a stimulus performed at a certain time interval and in a cure style, by using thermal and/or mineral waters, peloids (medical mud) and gases, in the form of bath, package, drinking and inhalation applications, whose methods and doses have been determined. compliance therapy. There are clinical studies showing that balneotherapy and mud pack applications reduce pain and increase functional capacity in knee osteoarthritis. Odabaşı et al. showed that peloidotherapy, one of the balneological methods, has not only thermic effect but also chemical effect in the treatment of knee OA. In patients with knee OA, pain, physical disability, quadriceps femoris muscle weakness and limitations in joint range of motion are observed. it reduces the level of physical activity, exercise capacity and quality of life in these people. The fact that the body is supported due to the buoyancy of the water in the exercises performed in the water reduces the load on the joints during the movement. For this reason, many movements that cannot be done on land can be done safely in water. On the other hand, because the density of water is higher than air, the muscles have to do more work even when performing a simple movement in water compared to the movements on land. Special rehabilitation programs based on water exercise programs have started to be one of the applications that can be done to increase muscle strength for these reasons.

When the literature was reviewed, we could not find any study examining the combination of aquatic exercise and peloid application in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of co-administration of peloid and aquatic exercises in knee osteoarthritis patients with a single-blind randomized controlled study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

76

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • primary knee osteoarthritis diagnosed according to the ACR criteria
  • gave their written informed consent
  • 40-75 ages
  • Kellgren Lawrence grading 2-4
  • having symptomatic knee pain at least 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • secondary knee OA
  • pathology of the waist, hip, or ankle joints
  • decompensated organ failure
  • malignancy,
  • active bleeding
  • infectious disease
  • serious knee injuries or previous surgical procedures within the past 6 months
  • the use of intraarticular steroids and hyaluronic acid injection to the knee joint within the past 6 months
  • physiotherapy, balneotherapy, or peloidotherapy within the past 1 year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment Group
Treatment group received 30 minutes of aquatic exercise by a physiotherapist in a warmed up to 33° C tap water and 30 minutes of mud pack treatment at 42°C on both knees 5 weekdays for 2 consecutive weeks (totally 10 sessions).
Treatment group received 30 minutes of aquatic exercise by a physiotherapist in a warmed up to 33° C tap water and 30 minutes of mud pack treatment at 42°C on both knees 5 weekdays for 2 consecutive weeks (totally 10 sessions).
Other Names:
  • water based exercise and mud pack therapy
No Intervention: Control Group
Control group continued to use their usual medical treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain (VAS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline pain (VAS) at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
The VAS is a commonly used scale which determines the intensity of pain. It consists of a 10-cm long line, drawn horizontally Numeric value (in cm between 0 and 10) of patients' pain intensity was determined by measuring the distance between the lowest VAS value and patients' marks.
Change from baseline pain (VAS) at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
WOMAC (total)
Time Frame: Change from baseline WOMAC scores at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
The WOMAC Scale is a commonly used well-being scale for patients with knee or hip OA. It consists of three main sections: pain, stiffness, and physical function. It contains a total of 24 items. Scoring of these items is done according to the Likert scale. In the Likert scale, patients indicate pain and difficulty levels by giving scores between 0 and 4. Turkish validity and reliability study had been conducted for WOMAC
Change from baseline WOMAC scores at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IGA (VAS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline IGA (VAS) at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
Investivagors' Global Assessment. The VAS is a commonly used scale which determines the intensity of pain. It consists of a 10-cm long line, drawn horizontally Numeric value (in cm between 0 and 10) of patients' pain intensity was determined by measuring the distance between the lowest VAS value and patients' marks.Also is used to assess the patients' global and physicians' global assessment.
Change from baseline IGA (VAS) at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
PGA (VAS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline PGA (VAS) at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
Patients' Global Assessment. The VAS is a commonly used scale which determines the intensity of pain. It consists of a 10-cm long line, drawn horizontally Numeric value (in cm between 0 and 10) of patients' pain intensity was determined by measuring the distance between the lowest VAS value and patients' marks.Also is used to assess the patients' global and physicians' global assessment.
Change from baseline PGA (VAS) at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
WOMAC (pain)
Time Frame: Change from baseline WOMAC (pain) scores at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
The WOMAC Scale is a commonly used well-being scale for patients with knee or hip OA. It consists of three main sections: pain, stiffness, and physical function. It contains a total of 24 items. Scoring of these items is done according to the Likert scale. In the Likert scale, patients indicate pain and difficulty levels by giving scores between 0 and 4. Turkish validity and reliability study had been conducted for WOMAC.
Change from baseline WOMAC (pain) scores at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
WOMAC (stiffness)
Time Frame: Change from baseline WOMAC (stiffness) scores at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
The WOMAC Scale is a commonly used well-being scale for patients with knee or hip OA. It consists of three main sections: pain, stiffness, and physical function. It contains a total of 24 items. Scoring of these items is done according to the Likert scale. In the Likert scale, patients indicate pain and difficulty levels by giving scores between 0 and 4. Turkish validity and reliability study had been conducted for WOMAC.
Change from baseline WOMAC (stiffness) scores at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
WOMAC (physical function)
Time Frame: Change from baseline WOMAC (physical function) at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
The WOMAC Scale is a commonly used well-being scale for patients with knee or hip OA. It consists of three main sections: pain, stiffness, and physical function. It contains a total of 24 items. Scoring of these items is done according to the Likert scale. In the Likert scale, patients indicate pain and difficulty levels by giving scores between 0 and 4. Turkish validity and reliability study had been conducted for WOMAC.
Change from baseline WOMAC (physical function) at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
LAFI
Time Frame: Change from baseline LAFI at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
LAFI is used to determine the pain and functional severity of knee and hip OA with three parts of pain, maximum walk distance and some activities of daily living. It has 11 questions of total score of 0 to 24 that higher scores shows more involvement
Change from baseline LAFI at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
HAQ
Time Frame: Change from baseline HAQ at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
HAQ is used to evaluate functional disability status of patients in eight subscales; dressing, rising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and usual activities. It includes 20 items and each item has 3 likert score which 0 to 3 where 3 is unable to do
Change from baseline HAQ at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
SF-36
Time Frame: Change from baseline SF-36 at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
The SF-36 Health Survey is a comprehensive measurement tool used to evaluate non-disease-specific overall quality of life. It has been developed and made available by Rand Corporation in order to evaluate overall quality of life (). It contains a total of 36 items with eight subscales: physical functioning, role-physical, role-emotional, bodily pain, social functioning, mental health, vitality, and general health. It grades the patient by using scores between 0 and 100,0 indicating poor health while 100 indicating good health. Turkish validity and reliability study had been con¬ducted for SF-36
Change from baseline SF-36 at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
Timed Up and Go Test
Time Frame: Change from baseline TUG at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.
TUG is a valid and reliable functional mobility test. It has a correlation with lower extremity strength and useful for identifying older adults risk of falling
Change from baseline TUG at the end of the treatment, 1 month after treatment ,3 months after treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 9, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 10, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

January 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on aquatic exercise and peloidotherapy

Subscribe