Optimal Margin Evaluation of Online Adaptive Radiotherapy for Postoperative Treatment of Endometrial and Cervical Cancer

A Prospective Study to Evaluate Optimal Margin of Iterative Cone-beam Computed Tomography Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy for Postoperative Treatment of Endometrial and Cervical Cancer

Online adaptive radiotherapy has demonstrated to be feasible to reduce inter-fractional radiotherapy errors as it re-optimizes treatment plan every fraction. To investigate the extent and value of margin reduction,we conduct a prospective clinical trial to determine the optimal margin and toxicity of smaller margin.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

This is a prospective phase II clinical trial with an anticipated total of more than 380 radiotherapy fractions of 15 patients to evaluate optimal margin of iterative cone-beam computed tomography(iCBCT) guided online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) for postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer. Postoperative endometrial and cervical cancer patients with following characteristics are included in the present study:(a)underwent radical surgery (b)no residual tumor at the resection margin by postoperative pathology(c)pathological findings indicate risk factors but no metastasis (d) adjuvant radiotherapy are prescribe (e)without evidence of para-aortic metastatic lymph nodes. Five patients (almost 125 fractions)treated with oART have the target volume contoured on pre-treatment iCBCTs and end-treatment iCBCTs. Anterior-posterior, lateral, and superior-inferior shifts were calculated and the average shift in all directions was calculated. A clinical target volume (CTV) to planing tumor volume (PTV) expansion is determined and verifies on a validation cohort of 10 patients (almost 250 fractions) treated with oART. Record acute toxicity from the start of treatment to 3 months after treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Fuquan Zhang, M.D.
  • Phone Number: +86 13311360431
  • Email: zhangfq@pumch.cn

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients must be informed of the investigational nature of this study and give written informed consent before treatment.
  2. Postoperative endometrial and cervical cancer patients with pathologically confirmed no residual tumor at the resection margin and no evidence of distant metastasis (FIGO stage IVB).
  3. Pathological findings indicate risk factors and adjuvant radiotherapy are prescribe.
  4. Karnofsky score ≥ 70.
  5. Subjects aged ≥ 18 years and ≤ 70 years.
  6. No evidence of para-aortic metastatic lymph nodes.
  7. No contraindications to CT scanning.
  8. Subjects must be able to cooperate in completing the entire study.
  9. Adequate marrow: neutrophile granulocyte count ≥1.5*10^9/L, hemoglobin ≥ 80 g/L, platelet count ≥100*10^9/L.
  10. Normal liver and kidney function: Creatinine (Cr) < 1.5 mg/dl, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 2*upper limit of normal (ULN).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who have received prior pelvic radiotherapy.
  2. Subjects with other primary malignancies.
  3. Subjects with contraindications to radiotherapy, as determined by the investigators.
  4. Any severe disease which may bring unacceptable risk or affect the compliance of the trial, for example, unstable cardiac disease requiring treatment, renal disease, chronic hepatitis, diabetes with poor control, and emotional disturbance.
  5. Active infection with fever.
  6. Active inflammatory bowel disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Online Adaptive Radiotherapy
Patients receive online adaptive radiotherapy. The CTV contours of the following areas: vaginal cuff, obturator nodal chain, internal iliac nodal chain, external iliac nodal chain, presacral nodal chain and common iliac nodal chain. The upper border of CTV is at the level of aortic bifurcation. A dose of 45-50.4Gy is delivered to CTV with online adaptive radiotherapy.
CTV covers pelvis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The dose coverage of target volume as assessed by planing tumor volume V100%
Time Frame: Through study completion, total an average of six month
Planing tumor volume V100%, defined as the planing tumor volume receiving at least 100% of the prescribed dose (V100%), is used to evaluate the dose coverage of target volume.
Through study completion, total an average of six month
A minimum PTV margin could encompass CTV
Time Frame: Through study completion, toral an average of six month
Expansions were applied to the pretreatment PTV to assess required minimum margin required to encompass the postreatment CTV.
Through study completion, toral an average of six month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with acute toxicity as assessed by CTCAE 5.0
Time Frame: From the start of treatment to 3 months after treatment
Evaluated with CTCAE 5.0
From the start of treatment to 3 months after treatment
Safety for treatment as assessed by organs at risk doses
Time Frame: Through study completion, total an average of six month
Safety for treatment was mainly evaluated by the organs at risk doses, including bladder, rectum, bone marrow, etc
Through study completion, total an average of six month
Adaptive time data
Time Frame: Through study completion, total an average of six month
For each treatment in each fraction, adaptive time was recorded from first cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to the selection of the preferred plan for the treatment.
Through study completion, total an average of six month
Target contouring accuracy
Time Frame: Through study completion, total an average of six month
For every target in each fraction, the evaluation of accuracy for target contouring are categorized as follow: no edits, minor edits, moderate edits, major edits and not applicable.
Through study completion, total an average of six month
Organs at risk contouring accuracy
Time Frame: Through study completion, total an average of six month
For every organs at risk in each fraction, the evaluation of accuracy for organs at risk contouring are categorized as follows: no edits, minor edits, moderate edits, major edits and not applicable.
Through study completion, total an average of six month
Late toxicity evaluated with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/EORTC late radiation morbidity scoring scheme
Time Frame: total an average of 2-year
Evaluated every three months with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/EORTC late radiation morbidity scoring scheme
total an average of 2-year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Fuquan Zhang, M.D., Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 6, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometrial Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on online adaptive radiotherapy

3
Subscribe