- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05687058
Empagliflozin in ESKD - A Feasibility Study
The aim of this study is to learn about the safety of empagliflozin in dialysis patients as a preparation for a future large clinical trial. Empagliflozin has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of either type 2 diabetes, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease among patients not on dialysis. The use of empagliflozin has not been studied or approved among patients on dialysis for kidney failure because empagliflozin acts on the kidneys. However, recent experimental studies have indicated that empagliflozin may provide direct heart benefits. Some dialysis patients have substantial residual kidney function, which may be protected by empagliflozin.
Participants will be given empagliflozin for three (3) months on top of the standard of care (usual medical care for participants' condition) and will be followed up until one (1) month after the last dose. The investigators will collect information about participants' general health, obtain blood, urine, and imaging studies, check home blood pressure, monitor home blood sugar levels, and ask health-related questions to assess the safety and potential benefits of empagliflozin over four (4) months, including one month before the three (3)-month empagliflozin treatment.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The incidence of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in the US ranks among the highest in the world. ESKD is the last phase of chronic kidney disease when the kidneys are functioning below 10-15% of normal capacity, and the patient is on dialysis. According to the US Renal Data System (USRDS), 120,834 individuals started dialysis and nearly 524,000 people were living on dialysis in 2017.1 Although advancement in technology and general medical care has led to a modest decrease in mortality among dialysis patients, their mortality rate remains extremely high at approximately 16.5 per 100 patient-years. The leading cause of death among dialysis patients is cardiovascular disease (CVD), accounting for almost 45% of deaths. Unfortunately, established therapies to prevent incident CVD in the general population, such as renin-angiotensin system inhibitors or statins, have not been shown to be effective in the dialysis population.
Sodium-glucose transporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are originally approved by FDA for the treatment for type 2 diabetes. SGLT2 is localized to the brush border of the early proximal tubule, and hence, SGLT2inhibitors induce osmotic diuresis and natriuresis but do not activate the systemic renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.2 Recent clinical trials have consistently shown their potent renal and cardiovascular benefits in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients, which cannot be explained only by their glucose-lowering and diuretic properties. In fact, diuretics have not been shown to reduce cardiovascular mortality and such benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors are clear even among non-diabetic populations.3-5 Their renoprotective effect potentially extends to the dialysis population where residual kidney function (RKF) still plays a major role in solute clearance and volume control and has a strong association with patient outcomes.6 Patients who retain greater RKF can consume a more liberal diet and have better nutritional status, less pill burden, better blood pressure, and less interdialytic fluid gain with less frequent intradialytic hypotension, as well as greater quality of life and better survival.6 The pathophysiology underlying the cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors are yet to be fully elucidated, but a recent in-vitro studies indicate its direct effects on cardiomyocytes. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that dialysis patients also benefit from SGLT2 inhibitors even if they do not have any RKF.
Efficacy and safety studies with SGLT2 inhibitors did not enroll end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients on dialysis. Empagliflozin, canagliflozin, and dapagliflozin can be started if the glomerular filtration rate is more than 20-25 mL/min per 1.73 m2 and can be continued until dialysis initiation or kidney transplant. From a pharmacokinetics standpoint, those SGLT2 inhibitors are extensively metabolized by glucuronidation into inactive metabolites, and are not likely to cause dose-dependent toxicity even in ESKD. Nevertheless, extra caution is necessary for their use in the setting of ESKD because SGLT2 inhibitors are not well dialyzable due to large distribution volumes and high protein binding rates.
Our overall goal is to conduct a non-randomized feasibility clinical trial of empagliflozin in the dialysis population to obtain data that will help plan future larger, sufficiently powered efficacy clinical trials. The investigators plan to enroll a total of 24 dialysis patients (18 patients on hemodialysis and 6 patients on peritoneal dialysis). After one month of the run-in period, participants will take oral empagliflozin for 3 months.
*Hemodialysis is a form of renal replacement therapy that utilizes an external filter (dialyzer) to remove wastes from the bloodstream. Peritoneal dialysis utilizes the peritoneum as a filter to remove wastes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Mississippi
-
Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39157
- University of Mississippi Medical Center
-
Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39213
- Jackson Medicall Mall Dialysis Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age ≥18 years;
- diagnosis of end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis, and
- ability to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg (pre-dialysis for HD patients)
- two or more episodes of urinary tract infection within the last 12 months
- history of urinary retention or urinary tract obstruction
- liver cirrhosis
- advanced heart failure requiring heart assist device or inotropic support
- heart or liver transplant recipient
- major surgery performed within the last 3 months ("major" per the investigator's assessment)
- major surgery scheduled within 3 months after screening ("major" per the investigator's assessment)
- active cancer
- pregnant or lactating women
- known allergy or hypersensitivity to any SGLT2 inhibitors
- history of ketoacidosis during the last 12 months
- any other medical condition considered unappropriated by their nephrologists or a study physician (i.e., cachexia, short life expectancy, or uncontrolled personality/phycological disorder).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Empagliflozin 25 mg thrice-weekly post-hemodialysis dosing
All participants undergoing thrice-weekly hemodialysis (HD) on the Monday-Wednesday-Friday (MWF) schedule will be assigned to the empagliflozin 25 mg thrice-weekly post-hemodialysis dosing arm (Group I).
|
Participants in Group I will be asked to take empagliflozin 25 mg after each hemodialysis session at home.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Empagliflozin 10 mg daily dosing
Patients undergoing thrice-weekly hemodialysis (HD) on the Tuesday-Thursday-Saturday (TTS) schedule, patients on twice-weekly HD, or patients on peritoneal dialysis will receive empagliflozin 10 mg daily (Group II).
|
Participants assigned to Group II will be asked to take empagliflozin 10 mg each morning between 8:30 and 9:30 a.m. at home.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of eligible patients out of screened patients
Time Frame: During the screening process
|
During the screening process
|
|
|
Success rate of obtaining consent from those eligible patients
Time Frame: During the enrollment process
|
During the enrollment process
|
|
|
Proportion of empagliflozin discontinuation
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Proportion of participants who discontinue empagliflozin for any reason
|
3 months
|
|
Dropout rate
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Proportion of participants who dropped out from the study for any reason
|
3 months
|
|
Length of time on continuous glucose monitoring
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Continuous glucose monitoring will be done for up to 14 days.
|
3 months
|
|
Completion rate of timed urine collection
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
|
|
Blood empagliflozin concentrations after the first dose among patients on peritoneal dialysis
Time Frame: Immediately before the first dose
|
The 1st blood draw for the pharmacokinetic study among patients on peritoneal dialysis
|
Immediately before the first dose
|
|
Blood empagliflozin concentrations after the first dose among patients on peritoneal dialysis
Time Frame: At 30 minutes of the first dose
|
The 2nd blood draw for the pharmacokinetic study among patients on peritoneal dialysis
|
At 30 minutes of the first dose
|
|
Blood empagliflozin concentrations after the first dose among patients on peritoneal dialysis
Time Frame: At 1 hour of the first dose
|
The 3rd blood draw for the pharmacokinetic study among patients on peritoneal dialysis
|
At 1 hour of the first dose
|
|
Blood empagliflozin concentrations after the first dose among patients on peritoneal dialysis
Time Frame: At 1.5 hours of the first dose
|
The 4th blood draw for the pharmacokinetic study among patients on peritoneal dialysis
|
At 1.5 hours of the first dose
|
|
Blood empagliflozin concentrations after the first dose among patients on peritoneal dialysis
Time Frame: At 2 hours of the first dose
|
The 5th blood draw for the pharmacokinetic study among patients on peritoneal dialysis
|
At 2 hours of the first dose
|
|
Blood empagliflozin concentrations after the first dose among patients on peritoneal dialysis
Time Frame: At 3 hours of the first dose
|
The 6th blood draw for the pharmacokinetic study among patients on peritoneal dialysis
|
At 3 hours of the first dose
|
|
Blood empagliflozin concentrations after the first dose among patients on peritoneal dialysis
Time Frame: At 4 hours of the first dose
|
The 7th blood draw for the pharmacokinetic study among patients on peritoneal dialysis
|
At 4 hours of the first dose
|
|
Blood empagliflozin concentrations after the first dose among patients on peritoneal dialysis
Time Frame: At 8 hours of the first dose
|
The 8th blood draw for the pharmacokinetic study among patients on peritoneal dialysis
|
At 8 hours of the first dose
|
|
Blood empagliflozin concentrations after the first dose among patients on peritoneal dialysis
Time Frame: At 12 hours of the first dose
|
The 9th blood draw for the pharmacokinetic study among patients on peritoneal dialysis
|
At 12 hours of the first dose
|
|
Blood empagliflozin concentrations after the first dose among patients on peritoneal dialysis
Time Frame: At 24 hours of the first dose
|
The 10th blood draw for the pharmacokinetic study among patients on peritoneal dialysis
|
At 24 hours of the first dose
|
|
Random blood empagliflozin level
Time Frame: At Month 1
|
Time since the last dose will be recorded.
|
At Month 1
|
|
Random blood empagliflozin level
Time Frame: At Month 2
|
Time since the last dose will be recorded.
|
At Month 2
|
|
Random blood empagliflozin level
Time Frame: At Month 3
|
Time since the last dose will be recorded.
|
At Month 3
|
|
Peritoneal dialysis clearance of empagliflozin
Time Frame: At Month 3
|
Peritoneal dialysis fluid will be collected for 24 hours.
|
At Month 3
|
|
Proportion of missing doses
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The investigators will do pill count using medication bottles and calculate the proportion of missing doses from each patient.
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
|
|
Number of Participants with Hepatic injury
Time Frame: 3 months
|
defined by an elevation of AST and/or ALT >3-fold upper limit of normal (ULN) combined with an elevation of total bilirubin >2-fold ULN measured, and/or marked peak aminotransferase (ALT and/or AST) elevations ≥5-fold ULN
|
3 months
|
|
Number of Participants with Lower limb amputation
Time Frame: 3 months
|
defined by any non-trauma-related event leading to a lower limb procedure of amputation, auto-amputation or disarticulation
|
3 months
|
|
Number of Participants with Symptomatic urinary tract infection
Time Frame: 3 months
|
defined by symptoms consistent with urinary tract infection plus pyuria and bacteriuria - urine culture sample has to be taken and sent to central lab for confirmation of the diagnosis
|
3 months
|
|
Number of Participants with genital infection
Time Frame: 3 months
|
per patient report
|
3 months
|
|
Number of Participants with Tinea cruris
Time Frame: 3 months
|
per patient report
|
3 months
|
|
Number of Participants with Nausea
Time Frame: 3 months
|
per patient report
|
3 months
|
|
Number of Participants with Vomiting
Time Frame: 3 months
|
per patient report
|
3 months
|
|
Number of Participants with Skin and soft tissue infection
Time Frame: 3 months
|
per patient report
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline to Month 3 in home systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
|
|
Changes from baseline to Month 3 in home diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
|
|
Changes from baseline to Month 3 in Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL)-36 questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Details are available at the URL below.
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/www/external/health/surveys_tools/kdqol/kdqol36.pdf
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline to Month 3 in residual kidney function
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Renal urea clearance
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline to Month 3 in hemoglobin
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
|
|
Changes from baseline to Month 3 in erythropoiesis stimulating drug dose
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
|
|
Hospitalization/Emergency room visit rate for heart failure
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
|
|
Cardiovascular mortality
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
|
|
Changes Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from baseline to Month 3
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Estimated by Cystatin C and beta-2 macroglobulin
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline to Month 3 in left ventricular end-diastolic volume
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To be evaluated by transthoracic echocardiogram (optional)
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline to Month 3 in left ventricular end-systolic volume
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To be evaluated by transthoracic echocardiogram (optional)
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline to Month 3 in left ventricular ejection fraction
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To be evaluated by transthoracic echocardiogram (optional)
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline to Month 3 in left ventricular diastolic function
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To be evaluated by transthoracic echocardiogram (optional)
|
3 months
|
|
Number of Participants with Ketoacidosis
Time Frame: 3 months
|
defined by elevated serum beta hydroxybutyrate ≥3.0 mmol/L
|
3 months
|
|
Days on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
Time Frame: Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
Per CGM report
|
Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
|
Days on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
Time Frame: At Month 0
|
Per CGM report
|
At Month 0
|
|
Days on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
Time Frame: At Month 2
|
Per CGM report
|
At Month 2
|
|
% Time of active CGM
Time Frame: Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
Per CGM report
|
Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
|
% Time of active CGM
Time Frame: At Month 0
|
Per CGM report
|
At Month 0
|
|
% Time of active CGM
Time Frame: At Month 2
|
Per CGM report
|
At Month 2
|
|
Average glucose
Time Frame: Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
Per CGM report
|
Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
|
Average glucose
Time Frame: At Month 0
|
Per CGM report
|
At Month 0
|
|
Average glucose
Time Frame: At Month 2
|
Per CGM report
|
At Month 2
|
|
Glucose management indicator (estimated A1C level based on the average glucose level from CGM readings for 14 or more days)
Time Frame: Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
Per CGM report
|
Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
|
Glucose management indicator (estimated A1C level based on the average glucose level from CGM readings for 14 or more days)
Time Frame: At Month 0
|
Per CGM report
|
At Month 0
|
|
Glucose management indicator (estimated A1C level based on the average glucose level from CGM readings for 14 or more days)
Time Frame: At Month 2
|
Per CGM report
|
At Month 2
|
|
Glucose variability
Time Frame: Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
Per CGM report
|
Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
|
Glucose variability
Time Frame: At Month 0
|
Per CGM report
|
At Month 0
|
|
Glucose variability
Time Frame: At Month 2
|
Per CGM report
|
At Month 2
|
|
Time in very high range (%)
Time Frame: Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
Percent time for plasma glucose >250 mg/dL
|
Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
|
Time in very high range (%)
Time Frame: At Month 0
|
Percent time for plasma glucose >250 mg/dL
|
At Month 0
|
|
Time in very high range (%)
Time Frame: At Month 2
|
Percent time for plasma glucose >250 mg/dL
|
At Month 2
|
|
Time in high range (%)
Time Frame: Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
Percent time for plasma glucose >180 to 250 mg/dL
|
Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
|
Time in high range (%)
Time Frame: At Month 0
|
Percent time for plasma glucose >180 to 250 mg/dL
|
At Month 0
|
|
Time in high range (%)
Time Frame: At Month 2
|
Percent time for plasma glucose >180 to 250 mg/dL
|
At Month 2
|
|
Time in target range (%)
Time Frame: Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
Percent time for plasma glucose >70 to 180 mg/dL
|
Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
|
Time in target range (%)
Time Frame: At Month 0
|
Percent time for plasma glucose >70 to 180 mg/dL
|
At Month 0
|
|
Time in target range (%)
Time Frame: At Month 2
|
Percent time for plasma glucose >70 to 180 mg/dL
|
At Month 2
|
|
Time in low range (%)
Time Frame: Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
Percent time for plasma glucose >54 to 70 mg/dL
|
Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
|
Time in low range (%)
Time Frame: At Month 0
|
Percent time for plasma glucose >54 to 70 mg/dL
|
At Month 0
|
|
Time in low range (%)
Time Frame: At Month 2
|
Percent time for plasma glucose >54 to 70 mg/dL
|
At Month 2
|
|
Time in very low range (%)
Time Frame: Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
Percent time for plasma glucose 54 mg/dL or lower
|
Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
|
Time in very low range (%)
Time Frame: At Month 0
|
Percent time for plasma glucose 54 mg/dL or lower
|
At Month 0
|
|
Time in very low range (%)
Time Frame: At Month 2
|
Percent time for plasma glucose 54 mg/dL or lower
|
At Month 2
|
|
Number of Participants with Hypoglycemia levels 1
Time Frame: Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
Plasma glucose <70 mg/dL for ≥15 minutes
|
Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
|
Number of Participants with Hypoglycemia levels 1
Time Frame: At Month 0
|
Plasma glucose <70 mg/dL for ≥15 minutes
|
At Month 0
|
|
Number of Participants with Hypoglycemia levels 1
Time Frame: At Month 2
|
Plasma glucose <70 mg/dL for ≥15 minutes
|
At Month 2
|
|
Number of Participants with Hypoglycemia levels 2
Time Frame: Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
Plasma glucose <54 mg/dL for ≥15 minutes
|
Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
|
Number of Participants with Hypoglycemia levels 2
Time Frame: At Month 0
|
Plasma glucose <54 mg/dL for ≥15 minutes
|
At Month 0
|
|
Number of Participants with Hypoglycemia levels 2
Time Frame: At Month 2
|
Plasma glucose <54 mg/dL for ≥15 minutes
|
At Month 2
|
|
Number of Participants with Prolonged hypoglycemia
Time Frame: Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
Plasma glucose <54 mg/dL for ≥2.0 hours
|
Run in (within one month prior to the study start)
|
|
Number of Participants with Prolonged hypoglycemia
Time Frame: At Month 0
|
Plasma glucose <54 mg/dL for ≥2.0 hours
|
At Month 0
|
|
Number of Participants with Prolonged hypoglycemia
Time Frame: At Month 2
|
Plasma glucose <54 mg/dL for ≥2.0 hours
|
At Month 2
|
|
Changes from baseline to Month 3 in left ventricular mass index
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To be evaluated by transthoracic echocardiogram (optional)
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline to Month 3 in longitudinal global strain
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To be evaluated by transthoracic echocardiogram (optional)
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline to Month 3 in radial global strain
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To be evaluated by transthoracic echocardiogram (optional)
|
3 months
|
|
Changes from baseline to Month 3 in circumferential global strain
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To be evaluated by transthoracic echocardiogram (optional)
|
3 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Semi-structured interview
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The results would be qualitative and provide data that are needed to improve the enrollment efficiency and protocol adherence.
This will be done by tracking eligible screened patients who then go on to participate in the study as well as overall participant compliance with study procedures.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yoshitsugu Obi, MD, PhD, University of Mississippi Medical Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Male Urogenital Diseases
- Kidney Diseases
- Urologic Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Heart Diseases
- Chronic Disease
- Disease Attributes
- Renal Insufficiency
- Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Heart Failure
- Kidney Failure, Chronic
- Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Hypoglycemic Agents
- empagliflozin
Other Study ID Numbers
- UMMC-Neph-EMPESKD-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Study Data/Documents
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruitingAcute Decompensated Heart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicPakistan
-
Indiana UniversityRecruitingCongestive Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Congestive Heart Failure Chronic | Congestive Heart Failure(CHF)United States
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc.RecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure Acute | Acute Heart Failure (AHF) | Heart Failure - NYHA II - IVUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicUnited States, Japan
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Clinical Trials on Empagliflozin 10 mg daily dosing
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedHeart Failure | Diabete Mellitus | Remodeling, Left VentricleEgypt
-
Washington D.C. Veterans Affairs Medical CenterBayerNot yet recruitingDiabetic Kidney DiseaseUnited States
-
Fatima MaqsoodCompletedHeart Failure | Diabetes MellitusPakistan
-
University of MinnesotaNot yet recruitingDiabetes | Partial Islet Function | TPIATUnited States
-
Bahria UniversityCompleted
-
Abdelrahman MahmoudRecruitingMetabolic Syndrome | Obesity & Overweight | HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)Egypt
-
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, IncTerminated
-
Chinese University of Hong KongRecruitingEnd Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis | Peritoneal Dialysis Complication | Residual Kidney Function | Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 InhibitorHong Kong
-
Damanhour UniversityCompletedHeart Failure | Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart FailureEgypt
-
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio ChavezActive, not recruitingSTEMI | No-Reflow PhenomenonMexico