Wrist Stabilizing Exercise Versus Hand Orthotic Intervention for Persons With Hypermobility

January 23, 2023 updated by: Göteborg University

Wrist Stabilizing Exercise Versus Hand Orthotic Intervention for Persons With Hypermobility -A Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this study is to investigate if a Wrist Stabilizing Exercise Programme, WSE, compared to Conventional Intervention use of orthosis in daily activities, HO in persons with Hypermobility Spectrum Disorders, HSD or hypermobility Ehlers Danlos Syndrome, hEDS, in order to reduce pain and or paraesthesia in the hand.

Participants are persons with HSD and hEDS with symptoms of persistent or intermittent pain and or paraesthesia in the hands for the past three years.

The main question aims to answer

  • if the WSE has effect on occupational performance and health related quality of life
  • if the WSE has effect on handfunction and handstrength The intervention WSE aimed to improve wrist stabilization and increased grip strength according to a training program.

Researchers will compare WSE and HO to see if there were changes between and within the intervention group, WSE and Convention group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

HSD and hEDS involves connective tissue and is characterized by hypermobility, pain and skin manifestations.

It is unknown whether persons with HSD and hEDS suffer from pain and or paraesthesia in the hands, which contributes to impaired hand function and grip strength, and it is unknown how it affects work performance and health-related quality of life. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of wrist stabilizing exercises WSE compared to conventional intervention HO, including orthosis, in persons with HSD and hEDS in order to reduce pain and or paraesthesia in the hand. In addition, the study examined how the interventions affected occupational performance and health-related quality of life as well as effects on function and strength.

Method The samples consisted of adults with HSD and hEDS with symptoms of persistent or intermittent pain and or paraesthesia in the hands for the past three years. WSE aimed at better wrist stabilization and increased grip strength according to a training program. The HO groups intervention included a hand orthosis during daily activities. The study examined changes between and within the interventions of WSE and HO over 12 weeks.169 subjects agreed to participate in the study and were randomized to WSE n = 83 or HO n = 86.

Measurements at baseline, after the end of the intervention and after 6 and 12 months.

The intervention WSE consited of Initial static strength training program for the wrist, which could progress to a higher weight in kilos alternatively to a dynamic strength training program. Information about HSD and hEDS. Daily exercise. Training schedule. 3-4 return visits to the OT.

The conventional HO Prescribed the wrist´s with plastic or metal orthoses. Information about HSD and hEDS. Use the orthosis in specific activities; carrying, vacuuming, doing laundry, driving, bicycling. Training schedule. 3-4 return visits to the OT.

Measurement instruments; JAMAR dynamometer, Disability arm, shoulder and hand Dash, Grip Ability Test GAT, EQ5D.

Approximately 20-25 Occupational Terapists OT with experience of hand training attended a half-day training session and were informed about the study design. The OTs were given a manual for conducting the study. The manual contained information on how the study protocol was to be handled and documented and how the information was to be presented to the subjects. The OTs were trained in the use and administration of the assessment instruments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

169

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gothenburg, Sweden
        • Gothenburg University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults 18 years and older
  • The diagnosis of HSD/hEDS within the last three years, with intermittent or consistent pain, and/or paresthesia of the hand.
  • Swedish speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Another illness/injury, such as stroke or arm/hand fracture/injury during the past 6 months, combined with HSD/hEDS, which could have affected the study's results.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The exercise group (WSE)

Initial static strength training program for the wrist, which could progress to a higher weight in kilos alternatively to a dynamic strength training program

  • Information about HSD/hEDS
  • Daily exercise
  • Training schedule
  • 3-4 return visits to the OT
Four of the five exercises included in the static or dynamic training program were based on holding the weight over the edge of the table and maintaining the position for 10 seconds, then resting briefly and changing to the next position. The training was performed in the following assumed positions, pronation, supination, radial and ulnar position. In the fifth and final exercise, you would squeeze an exercise ball as hard as possible without pain. The starting weight was 0.5 kilogram, and each exercise (1-4) was performed in three sets in the first week. The training increased by one set per week for up to eight sets/week if pain or paresthesia got worsened. If the training worked, the OT and the subject could choose to increase the weight to 1 kilogram and start over with three sets/day and gradually increase the training or switch to a dynamic training program.
No Intervention: Conventional intervention (HO)
  • Prescribed the wrist´s with plastic or metal orthoses
  • Information about HSD/hEDS
  • Use the orthosis in specific activities; carrying, vacuuming, doing laundry, driving, bicycling
  • Training schedule
  • 3-4 return visits to the OT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DASH questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline 12 weeks 6 and 12 month
A self-report instrument measuring capacity involving the shoulder arm and hand. The score is from 0-100 with 0 being no incapacities and 100 for the stated A change of more than 10 points on the DASH score as clinically significant.
Baseline 12 weeks 6 and 12 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The EuroQol EQ-5D
Time Frame: Baseline 12 weeks 6 and 12 month
A self-report measurement for health-related quality of life. The questionnaire consists of ranked increments from 1-3, where the person checks the option that best fits their current state of health. The second part consists score of perceived health status. A visual analogue scale, graded from 0-100.
Baseline 12 weeks 6 and 12 month
The Jamar dynamometer
Time Frame: Baseline 12 weeks 6 and 12 month
Hand strength. Measured by the right and left hand three times. The Norm range score is based on numeric values for age and gender by North Coast TM Hand Dynamometer. Values below the reference values are considered reduced hand strength and values above the reference values are considered better than normal hand strength. The Norm Ranges differ for differing age intervals. Norm Ranges are also different for gender.
Baseline 12 weeks 6 and 12 month
The Grip Ability Test
Time Frame: Baseline 12 weeks 6 and 12 month
Measure the function of the hand consisting of three sub-tasks. The reference value was numerical and had an average value of 16.5. A normal interval is considered between 11-20. Values above 20 indicate impaired hand function and values below 11 are considered above normal.
Baseline 12 weeks 6 and 12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Gothenburg University

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Diseases

Clinical Trials on Static strength training program or/and Dynamic strength training program of the hand

Subscribe