Clinical Evaluation of Enteral-extended Anti-reflux Stents for Pancreatic Pseudocyst

January 29, 2023 updated by: Huang Yonghui, Peking University Third Hospital

At present, endoscopic therapy is the preferred method to solve biliary or pancreatic diseases. And EUS-guided stent implantation and drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst is the main method in Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst. However, blockage of stent is a problem that has puzzled endoscopists for a long time. The mechanism of stent blockage is related to the reflux of gastrointestinal contents into the stent. Although plastic stents are widely used in patients who needed drainage. However, the average free time for stent is only 77 to 126 days, leading to the need for stent replacement in most patients within 3 months. As one end of the double pigtail stent used for drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst may be located in the stomach, it may cause the stent to be blocked by the contents of the stomach. Therefore, multiple stents or additional stents or drainage tube are often needed to further strengthen the drainage.

It seems that the mechanism of stent blockage are associated with gastrointestinal contents reflux. And stents required be replaced again by endoscopic approach when jamming. However, EUS and ERCP are difficult, costly, and may be with complications. Additional operations will increase the risks and costs. Therefore, a stent that can effectively prevent reflux, solve clinical problems, and effectively prolong stent patency time is urgently needed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

At present, endoscopic therapy is the preferred method to solve biliary or pancreatic diseases. And EUS-guided stent implantation and drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst is the main method in Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst. However, blockage of stent is a problem that has puzzled endoscopists for a long time. The mechanism of stent blockage is related to the reflux of gastrointestinal contents into the stent. Although plastic stents are widely used in patients who needed drainage. However, the average free time for stent is only 77 to 126 days, leading to the need for stent replacement in most patients within 3 months. As one end of the double pigtail stent used for drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst may be located in the stomach, it may cause the stent to be blocked by the contents of the stomach. Therefore, multiple stents or additional stents or drainage tube are often needed to further strengthen the drainage.

It seems that the mechanism of stent blockage are associated with gastrointestinal contents reflux. And stents required be replaced again by endoscopic approach when jamming. However, EUS and ERCP are difficult, costly, and may be with complications. Additional operations will increase the risks and costs. Therefore, a stent that can effectively prevent reflux, solve clinical problems, and effectively prolong stent patency time is urgently needed.

The extended enteral anti-reflux stent developed by our research team has potential advantages in prolonging the patency period of the stent and preventing secondary infection of pseudocysts. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effect of the stent on the drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

52

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100101
        • Recruiting
        • Peking University Third Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pancreatic pseudocyst by a variety of causes, including acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, drug-induced pancreatitis
  • Pseudocyst compressed gastrointestinal or bile duct and causes obstruction symptoms or causes other symptoms
  • Diameter of pseudocyst >6 cm with no compression symptoms, but progressively increases and is failed to conservatively treat

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Wall-off necrosis with liquidation mimics pseudocyst
  • Pseudocyst formation ≤8 weeks, cyst wall is immature
  • Cannot puncture by EUS-guided approach for any reason
  • Patients with serious cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases or other diseases which are not fitted to anaesthetize
  • Severe coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Enteral-extended Anti-reflux Stents Group
Patients are going to implant enteral-extended anti-reflux stents
Plant enteral-extended anti-reflux stents in EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Traditional Stents Group
Patients are going to implant traditional stents
Plant traditional stents in EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disappearance rate of pseudocyst(PDR) after stent implantation
Time Frame: in 6 months
PDR=1-(Postoperative pseudocyst area/Preoperative pseudocyst area)×100%
in 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time of disappearance of pseudocyst after stent implantation
Time Frame: in 6 months
Time of disappearance of pseudocyst after stent implantation
in 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 31, 2025

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2023

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LM2022426

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Pseudocyst

3
Subscribe