Self-Mobilization Versus Kinesio-Taping on the Cervical Region in Electronic Device Users

January 29, 2023 updated by: Seth Kwame Agyenkwa, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)

Effectiveness of Self-Mobilization Versus Kinesio-Taping on the Cervical Region in Electronic Device Users

The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of kinesio-taping versus self-mobilization applied to the cervical region of long-duration electronic device users.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

There is increasing use of electronic devices among individuals due to technological advancement and increasing work demands. The prolong use of these devices may result to discomfort in the neck and impairments in cervical range of motion, proprioceptive sense, muscle activities, and disability among users of electronic devices. Kinesio-taping and self-mobilization in the cervical region may improve function, and reduce disability. Therefore the aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of kinesio-taping against self-mobilization among long-duration electronic device users.

Participants will be randomized into either a kinesio-taping or self-mobilization group. Treatment will be administered within a four-week period. Participants will be evaluated at baseline, post-intervention and at one-month follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Complain of pain in the neck
  • Using electronic devices (including smart phones, desktop computers, laptops, tablets) for at least 4 hours a day,
  • Using electronic devices for at least 6 months,
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a history of allergic reaction,
  • Having previous cervical pathologies such as cervical spondylolisthesis, disc herniation, rheumatoid arthritis, muscle or ligament injury or strain,
  • Having had neck or shoulder surgery,
  • Having a neurological deficit (eg numbness, muscle weakness and loss of sensation).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Kinesio-taping group
Kinesio-tape will be applied from the dorsal region (T1-T2) to the upper cervical region (C1-C2), two times weekly in a period of four weeks.
5 cm wide and 0.5 mm thick waterproof, porous and adhesive tape will be applied to the posterior neck of the participants while sitting comfortably in a neutral position. The first tape (Y-strip) is placed over the posterior cervical extensor muscles with approximately 25% tension. The top strip will be placed perpendicular to the Y strip on the mid-cervical region. The participant's cervical spine is flexed to obtain tension in the posterior structures.
EXPERIMENTAL: Self-mobilization group
Self-SNAG technique will be applied by the participants with the help of a towel, and performed for a four week period.
The towel will be placed on the posterior arch of the fifth cervical vertebra and pulled horizontally across the face. The participant will be instructed to apply pressure to the towel and turn their head to the restricted side, then maintain the finishing interval for three seconds. The participant will be asked to apply extreme pressure in the bending position with towel support. The procedure should be painless and repeated 10 times.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Upper trapezius electrical muscle activity
Time Frame: Baseline, before treatment
The Trigno Avanti SEMG system (Delsys inc., Boston) will be used to measure the surface electromyographic activities of the upper trapezius muscle.The electrodes will be placed over the right and left trapezius muscle along the lines connecting the spinous process of the seventh cervical vertebra (C7) to the right and left acromion.
Baseline, before treatment
Upper trapezius electrical muscle activity
Time Frame: One week post-treatment (week 5)
The Trigno Avanti SEMG system (Delsys inc., Boston) will be used to measure the surface electromyographic activities of the upper trapezius muscle.The electrodes will be placed over the right and left trapezius muscle along the lines connecting the spinous process of the seventh cervical vertebra (C7) to the right and left acromion.
One week post-treatment (week 5)
Upper trapezius electrical muscle activity
Time Frame: One-month follow up (week 9)
The Trigno Avanti SEMG system (Delsys inc., Boston) will be used to measure the surface electromyographic activities of the upper trapezius muscle.The electrodes will be placed over the right and left trapezius muscle along the lines connecting the spinous process of the seventh cervical vertebra (C7) to the right and left acromion.
One-month follow up (week 9)
Visaul Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, before treatment
Participants will indicate their pain level on a 10 cm horizontal line; where 0 indicates no pain and 1- the worst possible pain the subject could experience.
Baseline, before treatment
Visaul Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: One week post-treatment (week 5)
Participants will indicate their pain level on a 10 cm horizontal line; where 0 indicates no pain and 1- the worst possible pain the subject could experience.
One week post-treatment (week 5)
Visaul Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: One-month follow up (week 9)
Participants will indicate their pain level on a 10 cm horizontal line; where 0 indicates no pain and 1- the worst possible pain the subject could experience.
One-month follow up (week 9)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Joint Position Sense Error
Time Frame: Baseline, before treatment
Joint position sense error of the cervical joint will be tested in flexion, extension, left and right rotation using a laser pointer.
Baseline, before treatment
Joint Position Sense Error
Time Frame: One week post-treatment (week 5)
Joint position sense error of the cervical joint will be tested in flexion, extension, left and right rotation using a laser pointer.
One week post-treatment (week 5)
Joint Position Sense Error
Time Frame: One-month follow up (week 9)
Joint position sense error of the cervical joint will be tested in flexion, extension, left and right rotation using a laser pointer.
One-month follow up (week 9)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 16, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2023

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • E-74555795-050.01.04-533346

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Kinesiology taping

Subscribe