Testing Interventions for Mobility Through Exercise (TIME) (TIME)

February 4, 2026 updated by: Christopher Sciamanna, MD, MPH, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

PCORI-HA-2021C3-25041 Comparative Effectiveness of Brief Strength and Balance Exercises and Standard Home-Based Group Exercise for Primary Care Patients With Mobility Disability

In this project, the team plans to test the impact of FAST, its brief home-based strength training program which includes performance goal setting, to a program for home (BAND TOGETHER) that is similar to one offered by Silver Sneakers, available online to millions of older adults, and includes strength, balance, and aerobic exercises. The team hypothesizes that the brief program (FAST) will improve leg function better than the standard program (BAND TOGETHER), by encouraging older adults to be more consistent with using it and to try harder when they do.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

One in four older adults, the fastest growing demographic group in the US, reports serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs. Older adults note that these walking difficulties "deprives you of your identity" and "affects my day to day life… I can't do very much work on my own." Walking difficulties impair people's quality of life more than depression, anxiety, or pain. Walking difficulties also increase the chances of future disability, death, and healthcare costs. Though strength training improves walking ability, fewer than one in five older adults do strength training enough to benefit. What is unknown is how to create a strength training program that improves the ability of older adults to walk and do other things they need and want to do and that older adults are willing to do.

One approach to designing a strength training program that has not been tried before is to make them shorter. In 2020, the project team set out to design a short strength training program that older adults could do at home that would improve their physical function and that they would consistently do. The program was called FAST (Functional Activity Strength Training) and, to make it more effective, the team set specific goals for how many additional repetitions each person should be able to do over 12 weeks. These goals were then mentioned repeatedly, and feedback was provided about how well people made progress toward these goals.

In the first study of FAST (FAST-1), 24 healthy older adults performed 30 seconds of squats and push-ups each day but received no personal supervision. Over six months, they performed the exercises on 73 percent of days, which led to large increases in the number of push-ups and squats they were able to do. In the second study of FAST (FAST-2), the team randomly assigned 97 older adults who had trouble walking, and those assigned to do 30 seconds each of chair stands and steps onto a stepper each day improved their ability to stand up from a chair and stand on one leg more than those who did not do the exercises.

In this project, the team plans to test the impact of FAST, its brief home-based strength training program which includes performance goal setting, to a program for home (BAND TOGETHER) that is similar to one offered by Silver Sneakers, available online to millions of older adults, and includes strength, balance, and aerobic exercises. The team hypothesizes that the brief program (FAST) will improve leg function better than the standard program (BAND TOGETHER), by encouraging older adults to be more consistent with using it and to try harder when they do.

This study will enroll 520 primary care patients who are at least 65 years of age and randomly assign them to have access to 12 months of daily FAST or three-times weekly BAND TOGETHER. Each program will be delivered via the internet and each patient will receive about 30 minutes per month of personal support. The study will enroll patients who have trouble walking, have access to the internet, can provide informed consent, and receive permission from their doctor. The study is designed to see whether patients who have access to FAST, after 12 months, have better walking ability, balance, and leg strength and can do their normal daily activities more easily and fall less often than patients who have access to BAND TOGETHER.

To help us understand how best to perform the study, as well as how best to share the results, the study team assembled a group of stakeholders that includes patients, primary care providers, fitness center directors, and people who work for insurance, public health, and senior services organizations. The team will bring those stakeholders together each year and consult them regularly to help make difficult decisions as they arise-decisions that may impact each group of stakeholders differently. Two patient partners will work with investigators to supervise the group of stakeholders and organize their feedback, structured as a public comment period, to help the research team make decisions that take into account the perspectives of all of the key groups of stakeholders involved in improving the physical function of older adults.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

702

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age greater than or equal to 65
  • Self reported difficulty or inability to walk 1/4/ mile
  • Access to the Internet
  • Covid vaccination

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chest pain on the PAR-Q
  • Participating in another research project involving physical activity, falls or weight loss
  • Planning to move or have surgery in the next 12 months
  • Cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FAST-BCT
FAST exercise intervention without behavior change techniques applied. Daily exercise intervention including functional resistance training and personalized coaching.
Daily exercise intervention including functional resistance exercises and personalized coaching.
Experimental: FAST+BCT
FAST exercise intervention with behavior change techniques applied. Daily exercise intervention including functional resistance training and personalized coaching with added reminders, education, goal setting, self monitoring, and feedback to encourage adherence and effort.
Daily exercise intervention including functional resistance exercises and personalized coaching.
Reminders, education, goal-setting, self-monitoring, and feedback used to encourage participants to increase effort and adherence
Active Comparator: BT-BCT
Band Together exercise intervention without behavior change techniques applied. 3 times weekly group exercise intervention held over Zoom featuring strength and balance exercises for 45 minutes.
3 times weekly group exercise over Zoom featuring strength and balance exercises for 45 minutes
Active Comparator: BT+BCT
Band Together exercise intervention with behavior change techniques applied. 3 times weekly group exercise intervention held over Zoom featuring strength and balance exercises for 45 minutes with added reminders, education, goal setting, self monitoring, and feedback to encourage adherence and effort.
Reminders, education, goal-setting, self-monitoring, and feedback used to encourage participants to increase effort and adherence
3 times weekly group exercise over Zoom featuring strength and balance exercises for 45 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Function
Time Frame: 12 Months
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Scale (PROMIS-29). The minimum and maximum values are unable to do and without any difficulty, and a higher score means a better outcome.
12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lower Extremity Performance
Time Frame: 12 Months
Short Physical Performance Battery. The minimum value is a score of 0 points, the maximum value is a score of 16. A higher score means a better outcome.
12 Months
Dose Received
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Sessions completed per week (percent)
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Effort (Rating of Perceived Exertion)
Time Frame: Monthly up to 12 months
Rating of Perceived Exertion. The minimum value is 0 (at rest) and the maximum value is 10 (maximal). This is a purely subjective measure here a higher or lower score doesn't necessarily lead to a better outcome, but for our exercise study we have a target RPE of 5 for exercise.
Monthly up to 12 months
Gait Speed (10 meter walk test)
Time Frame: 12 Months
Gait Speed (10 meter walk test). Participants undergo two trials (comfortable speed and fast speed), and an average of the two trials is used as the gait speed in m/s.
12 Months
Muscle Strength
Time Frame: 12 Months
Upper and lower extremity strength
12 Months
Walking Ability
Time Frame: 12 Months
6 Minute Walk Distance
12 Months
Fatigue, Pain
Time Frame: 12 Months
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Scale (PROMIS-29). The minimum value for the fatigue scales is "not at all", the maximum value is "very much". A lower score means a better outcome. The minimum values for the pain scales are "not at all" and 0, the maximum values "very much" and 10. A lower value means a better outcome.
12 Months
Falls
Time Frame: 12 Months
Percent experiencing a fall-related injury
12 Months
Physical Activity
Time Frame: 12 months
Accelerometry over 7 days
12 months
Number of participants with a self-reported injury due to physical activities
Time Frame: Monthly up to 12 months
Injuries due to physical activities
Monthly up to 12 months
Program Satisfaction
Time Frame: Monthly up to 12 months
Net Promoter Score. The maximum value is 10 and the minimum value is 0. A higher value means a better outcome.
Monthly up to 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body Weight (kg)
Time Frame: 12 Months
Body Weight (kg)
12 Months
Height (cm)
Time Frame: 12 Months
Height (cm)
12 Months
Sociodemographics, self-reported medical history and tobacco use
Time Frame: Baseline
Age, gender, race and ethnicity, medical history, smoking status, and education
Baseline
Caregiving Status Questions (Receiving and Providing)
Time Frame: Monthly up to 12 months
Giving and receiving caregiving, paid or unpaid, for personal care needs, such as eating, bathing, dressing, or getting around inside the home.
Monthly up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HA-2021C3-25041
  • PCORI-HA-2021C3-25041 (Other Identifier: PCORI)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mobility Limitation

Clinical Trials on FAST (Functional Activity Strength Training)

Subscribe