Effects of Functional Progressive Strength Training in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy

October 24, 2024 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Functional Progressive Strength Training on Gait Parameters and Walking Capacity in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy

This study focuses on the effects of Functional Progressive Strength Training (FPST) on children with spastic cerebral palsy, a condition characterized by increased muscle tone that affects movement. Spastic cerebral palsy is one type of cerebral palsy, with others including dyskinetic, which involves involuntary movements, and ataxic, which affects coordination. FPST differs from traditional strength training by incorporating exercises that replicate everyday activities to integrate strength use in daily movements. The study uses an experimental design with participants aged 6-12 years, recruited from specialized centers. They are randomly assigned to either a treatment group receiving FPST or a control group receiving standard care. The study aims to measure improvements in gait and mobility, assessed through various tools like step and stride length, cadence, and gait speed, alongside caregiver reports and direct observations. Statistical analyses will determine the effectiveness of FPST in enhancing motor function and walking capacity in these children.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the outlined study, participants who fit the necessary inclusion and exclusion criteria are asked to provide written informed consent before taking part. The randomization process involves each participant drawing a number from a box: those who draw number one are placed in Group A (experimental group), while those drawing number two are placed in Group B (control group).

Group A undergoes a specialized treatment approach called Functional Progressive Resistance Exercise (FPRE), in addition to receiving conventional treatment. The FPRE regimen starts with a three-minute warm-up that includes range of motion mobilization and stretching exercises. This is followed by a series of resistance exercises, such as sit-to-stand activities, which increase in intensity over a six-week period, targeting specific percentages of body weight. The participants then engage in half-kneeling, standing up, and side-step-up exercises for 20 minutes each, with rest intervals. The session concludes with a two-minute cooldown. The protocol is designed to gradually increase the load carried by the participants, scaling up to five times, then 10 times, and eventually 15 times the initial weight, with a minimum of one minute of rest between sets. The exercises are calibrated through trial and error to find the maximum load that can be lifted for the defined number of repetitions and sets.

Group B participants receive conventional physical therapy aimed at maintaining muscle flexibility and improving motor function. Their routine includes an hour-long session three times a week, consisting of stretching exercises focused on muscles prone to tightness, such as the Achilles tendons, hamstrings, hip flexors, and adductors. Strength training targets specific muscle groups including hip flexors, knee extensors, and ankle dorsiflexors. The gait training in Group B starts in a controlled environment, such as walking between parallel bars, and progresses to more complex tasks like walking unassisted in open spaces, navigating different floor surfaces, and moving through obstacle-laden paths.

Both groups are reassessed after 12 weeks to evaluate the impact of their respective interventions on gait parameters and walking capacity, using a combination of direct observation, caregiver reports, and standardized assessment tools. The study aims to ascertain the relative efficacy of these two approaches in enhancing mobility and quality of life for children with spastic cerebral palsy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54000
        • Riphah International University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 6 to 12 years
  • Children had to be able to understand and follow instructions
  • Diplegic CP
  • GMFSC I, II, III

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with botulinum toxin A in lower limb.
  • Rhizotomy done 6 months before the study.
  • Children with unstable seizures will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Functional Progressive Strength Training
group of 20 children with spastic cerebral palsy on which FPST techniques including 3 or 4 PRT sessions per week for 12 weekswill be applied.
The Functional Progressive Resistance Exercise (FPRE) protocol is designed to improve functional strength through structured workouts. It begins with a 3-minute warmup involving stretching and range of motion exercises, followed by progressively intense sit-to-stand exercises over six weeks. Participants also perform half-kneeling, standing up, and side-step-up exercises, with 20 minutes of total activity and rest intervals. The session ends with a 2-minute cooldown. Weights are gradually increased up to 15 times the initial load, with a minimum of one-minute rest between sets. The regimen is tailored through trial and error to find the maximum load participants can effectively manage.
Other: Control
group of 20 children with spastic cerebral palsy on which conventional physical therapy techniques will be applied
conventional physical therapy techniques will be applied

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait Parameters
Time Frame: 12 weeks
To assess gait parameters in a study, four tools are utilized: step length, measuring the distance between alternating heel strikes; stride length, measuring the distance between two heel strikes of the same extremity; cadence, counting the number of steps taken; and gait speed, timing the duration to cover a 5-meter distance with a stopwatch.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The 1-minute walk test assesses walking capacity on a 20-meter indoor track, recording the distance a participant covers in one minute while walking as fast as possible without running.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kashaf Naeem, MS*, Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 28, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 25, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Functional Progressive Strength Training

Subscribe