- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05731037
Influence of Restitution Time in Treatment of Patellar Tendinopathy (TEREX)
Patellar Tendinopathy - The Role of Restitution Time in Exercise- Based Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial (the TEREX Trial)
The purpose of the present project is to investigate if the restitution time from loading in an exercise-based 12 weeks rehabilitation regime for patellar tendinopathy influences the clinical outcome, tendon structure and function.
The investigators hypothesize that greater restitution from loading (1 exercise day per week) will yield a greater positive clinical outcome, and tissue structure and function in patients with patellar tendinopathy compared to less restitution (3 exercise days per week), when impact activities are restricted in both groups.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, open label, superiority trial with a two-group parallel design and primary endpoint after 12 weeks. The study has two phases; The first phase includes the main trial in which a 12-week intervention period will be undertaken to test the hypotheses in patients with chronic patellar tendinopathy (symptoms > 3 months).
At 12 weeks, a smaller group of patients (responding and not-responding to the 12-week intervention period) will be offered to participate in sub-study 1. In this explorative cross-sectional study, the feasibility of mapping brain structure, function and metabolism using Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) imaging technique in chronic patellar tendinopathy patients will be assessed.
The second phase in the main study includes the follow-up from 12 week to the secondary endpoint at 52 weeks after baseline. During this period the participants will be monitored via questionnaires for treatment satisfaction and improvements at 4-week intervals. What treatment and the duration of treatment patients will receive in this phase is based on the concept of personalized medicine. We expect the majority of patient to continue in the group with loading-based intervention. A smaller group of the 52 patients from the main study is expected to be included in sub-study two.
Sub study two is designed as an observational cohort study. In this sub study, patients reporting no self-evaluated improvement after 12 weeks of loading-based treatment will be asked to be part of a group receiving corticosteroid injection treatment followed by continued exercise-based treatment and avoidance of impact loading. The cohort will further include patients that after week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40 respond that they have not achieved their Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
NV
-
Copenhagen, NV, Denmark, 2400
- Department of Physical & Occupational Therapy/ Institute of Sports Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Sports active men and women.
- Age (18-60) years old.
- BMI (18.5-30)
- Understand and read Danish
- Uni- or bilateral patellar tendinopathy
- Symptom onset >90 days ago
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patellar tendinopathy longer than 24 months
- Smoking
- Previous surgery in the knee on the ipsilateral side.
- Corticosteroid injection in the patellar tendon on the ipsilateral side within the last 6 months.
- Any confounding diagnosis to the knee joint
- Known arthritis
- Known diabetes
- Inability to follow rehabilitation or complete follow-ups
- Enrolled in a resistance based-rehabilitation program for the affected patellar tendon within the previous three month
- Have a work were it is not feasible to avoid pain provoking tasks
Extra criteria sub-study one
Inclusion criteria:
• Five patients from the main study, rating "improved" and "not improved" respectively, will be invited to participate in sub-study one.
Exclusion criteria:
- Claustrophobia
- Pregnancy
- Breastfeeding
Extra criteria sub-study two:
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients from the main study, that rate themselves 'not improved' in symptoms after 12 week.
- Patients who have not achieved Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after week 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40, will be invited to participate in sub- study two.
Exclusion criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Breastfeeding
- Previously had an allergic reaction for steroid (Depomedrol).
- Previously had an allergic reaction for local anesthesia treatment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Short restitution group (SR)
Resistance training for knee extensors three training session per week.
|
The exercise will be started at 60% of 1 repetition maximum (RM) and progressed to 75% of 1 RM during the first 3 weeks and maintained throughout the intervention period.
The exercise will be performed slowly (6 s/ repetition).
|
|
Experimental: Extended restitution group (ER)
Resistance training for knee extensors on training session per week (greater restitution from loading).
|
The exercise will be started at 60% of 1 repetition maximum (RM) and progressed to 75% of 1 RM during the first 3 weeks and maintained throughout the intervention period.
The exercise will be performed slowly (6 s/ repetition).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient perception VISA-P
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 12
|
Change in Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - patella (VISA-P) total score.
The VISA-P asses symptoms, function and the ability to participate in sport.
It consists of 8 questions, with a maximum score of 100 indicating the person is asymptomatic and fully per-forming and lower scores indicating more symptoms and limitations of function and activity.
|
Change from baseline at week 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient perception VISA-P secondary
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 16 and 52
|
Change in Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - patella (VISA-P) total score.
The VISA-P asses symptoms, function and the ability to participate in sport.
It consists of 8 questions, with a maximum score of 100 indicating the person is asymptomatic and fully per-forming and lower scores indicating more symptoms and limitations of function and activity.
|
Change from baseline at week 16 and 52
|
|
Patient perception VISA-P truncated
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 12, 16 and 52
|
Change in Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - patella (VISA-P) truncated score.
The truncated score only including questions 2-6, with a maximum score of 50.
Lower scores indicating more symptoms and limitations of function and activity.
|
Change from baseline at week 12, 16 and 52
|
|
Self-reported pain (NRS) - Preferred sport
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
Change in pain rating on an 11 point numeric rating scale (NRS) during preferred sport, with 10 being the worst imaginable pain and 0 denoting no pain.
|
Change from baseline at week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
|
Self-reported pain (NRS) - Rest
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
Change in pain rating on an 11 point numeric rating scale (NRS) during rest, with 10 being the worst imaginable pain and 0 denoting no pain.
|
Change from baseline at week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
|
Self-reported pain (NRS) - Daily activities
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
Change in pain rating on an 11 point numeric rating scale (NRS) during daily activities, with 10 being the worst imaginable pain and 0 denoting no pain.
|
Change from baseline at week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
|
Self-reported improvement (GROC)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 12, 16 and 52.
|
Self-reported improvement after treatment will be evaluated by the Global Rating of change (GROC) on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 'much improved' to 'much worse'.
|
Change from baseline at week 12, 16 and 52.
|
|
Sports participation
Time Frame: Week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
Number of sports participation hours per week (training and competition).
|
Week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
|
Sports types
Time Frame: Week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
Typer of sports performed.
|
Week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
|
Sports intensity
Time Frame: Week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
Intensity of sport performed registred in a self-reported questianaire and categorized as; light, moderate or vigorous.
|
Week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
|
Self-reported satisfaction (PASS)
Time Frame: Week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
|
Self-evaluated satisfaction with treatment result will be evaluated by Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'very satisfied' to 'very unsaticfied'
|
Week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
|
|
Treatment received
Time Frame: Week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
Registration of any additive treatment received from last follow-up measured with self-reported questionnaire.
|
Week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
|
Care-seeking behavior
Time Frame: Week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
Registration of any additive care-seeking behavior from last follow-up measured with self-reported questionnaire.
|
Week 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52.
|
|
The single-leg decline squat (SLDS) will be used to assess pain during function
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 12 and 52.
|
Participants performed a decline squat on a 25°decline board and reported pain using an 11 point numeric rating scale (NRS) upon completion, with 10 being the worst imaginable pain and 0 denoting no pain.
|
Change from baseline at week 12 and 52.
|
|
Muscle strength
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 12 and 52.
|
Maximal muscle strength is obtained during standardized maximal voluntary contractions.
|
Change from baseline at week 12 and 52.
|
|
Ultrasonography - tendon thickness
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 12 and 52.
|
Grey scale ultrasonography will be used for evaluation of patellar tendon thickness.
|
Change from baseline at week 12 and 52.
|
|
Ultrasonography - tendon neovascularization
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 12 and 52.
|
Doppler ultrasonography will be used for evaluation of patellar tendon neovascularization.
|
Change from baseline at week 12 and 52.
|
|
Ultrasonography - tendon microvascularisation
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 12 and 52.
|
B-Flow ultrasonography will be used for evaluation of patellar tendon microvascularisation.
|
Change from baseline at week 12 and 52.
|
|
Counter movement Jump height
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 12 and 52.
|
Jump height during Counter movement Jump test will be used to assess patellar tendinopathy caused functional deficits.
|
Change from baseline at week 12 and 52.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) imaging technique - Brain structure mapping.
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
|
It will be testet If it is feasible to map brain structure changes in patient with chronic patellar tendinopathy using MRI BOLD imaging technique.
The outcome will only be used for participants included in sub-study one.
|
At 12 weeks
|
|
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) imaging technique - Brain function mapping.
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
|
It will be testet If it is feasible to map brain function changes in patient with chronic patellar tendinopathy using MRI BOLD imaging technique.
The outcome will only be used for participants included in sub-study one.
|
At 12 weeks
|
|
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) imaging technique - Brain metabolism mapping.
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
|
It will be testet If it is feasible to map brain metabolism changes in patient with chronic patellar tendinopathy using MRI BOLD imaging technique.
The outcome will only be used for participants included in sub-study one.
|
At 12 weeks
|
|
Correlation between patient self-reported satisfaction and brain structure changes.
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
|
Patient self-reported satisfaction will be assessed by Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and brain structure by Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) imaging technique.
The outcome will only be used for participants included in sub-study one.
|
At 12 weeks
|
|
Correlation between patient self-reported satisfaction and brain function changes.
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
|
Patient self-reported satisfaction will be assessed by Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and brain function by Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) imaging technique.
The outcome will only be used for participants included in sub-study one.
|
At 12 weeks
|
|
Correlation between patient self-reported satisfaction and brain metabolism changes.
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
|
Patient self-reported satisfaction will be assessed by Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and brain metabolism by Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) imaging technique.
The outcome will only be used for participants included in sub-study one.
|
At 12 weeks
|
|
Number of corticosteroid injections received
Time Frame: week 12 to 52
|
Number of injections received from week 12-52 for patients participating in sub-study two.
|
week 12 to 52
|
|
Tendon thickness after injection.
Time Frame: Change from 1. injection and at week 4 and 8 after the injection.
|
Grey scale ultrasonography will be used for evaluation of patellar tendon thickness.
Only for patients participating in sub-study two.
|
Change from 1. injection and at week 4 and 8 after the injection.
|
|
Tendon neovascularization after injection.
Time Frame: Change from 1. injection and at week 4 and 8 after the injection.
|
Doppler ultrasonography will be used for evaluation of patellar tendon neovascularization.
Only for patients participating in sub-study two.
|
Change from 1. injection and at week 4 and 8 after the injection.
|
|
Tendon microvascular blood flow after injection.
Time Frame: Change from 1. injection and at week 4 and 8 after the injection.
|
B-Flow ultrasonography will be used for evaluation of patellar tendon microvascularisation.
Only for patients participating in sub-study two.
|
Change from 1. injection and at week 4 and 8 after the injection.
|
|
Self-reported satisfaction after injection.
Time Frame: Change from 1. injection and at week 4 and 8 after the injection.
|
Self-evaluated satisfaction with treatment result will be evaluated by Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'very satisfied' to 'very unsaticfied'Symptom State (PASS) scale.
|
Change from 1. injection and at week 4 and 8 after the injection.
|
|
Registration of pain rating on numeric rating scale (NRS) during injection.
Time Frame: Week 12 to 52
|
Pain rating will be evaluated on an 11 point numeric rating scale (NRS) during injection, with 10 being the worst imaginable pain and 0 denoting no pain.
Only for patients participating in sub-study two.
|
Week 12 to 52
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- The TEREX trial
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Jumper's Knee
-
University Hospital, MontpellierNot yet recruitingIdentification of Kinematic Variables Specific of Patellar Tendinopathy in Athletes at Risk (TENVOL)Knee Injuries | Jumper's Knee | Patellar Tendinitis | Musculoskeletal InjuriesFrance
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Universidad Nacional de CórdobaCompletedJumper's Knee | Patellar TendinitisArgentina
-
Bispebjerg HospitalRecruitingTendinopathy | Jumper's KneeDenmark
-
Bispebjerg HospitalCompletedJumper's Knee | Patellar TendinopathyDenmark
-
Bispebjerg HospitalUniversity College Absalon; Danske FysioterapeuterActive, not recruitingJumper's Knee | Patellar TendinopathyDenmark
-
Wingate InstituteCompletedPatellar Tendonitis | Jumper's Knee | Patellar TendinopathyIsrael
-
University of DelawareCompletedJumper's Knee | Patellar Tendinopathy | Patellar Tendinitis | Patellar Tendon Pain | Patellar TendinosisUnited States
-
Lucas R. Cusumano, MDNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Discomfort | Knee Pain Chronic | Knee Swelling PainUnited States
-
Copenhagen University Hospital, HvidovreUniversity of Southern Denmark; University Hospital Bispebjerg and FrederiksbergNot yet recruitingKnee Arthroplasty | Total Knee Arthroplasty | Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
Clinical Trials on Resistance training for knee extensors
-
Bispebjerg HospitalRecruitingTendinopathy | Jumper's KneeDenmark
-
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityUmm Al-Qura UniversityCompletedKnee OsteoarthritisSaudi Arabia
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandAME2P Laboratory, Clermont Auvergne UniversityTerminated
-
Moisés Giménez CostaCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne...Université de ToulonCompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)France
-
McMaster UniversityCompletedMuscle Atrophy | Disuse Atrophy (Muscle) of Lower LegCanada
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompletedMenstrual Cycle | Exercise Performance ImpairmentGreece
-
McMaster UniversityActive, not recruitingHypertrophy | Exercise | Proteomics | Atrophy, DisuseCanada
-
University Hospital, ToulouseCompletedMusculoskeletal DiseasesFrance
-
University of Nove de JulhoUnknownPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeBrazil