Impact of an Intervention Combining Fortified Meals and Physical Activity in the Prevention of Undernutrition in Seniors (FORTIPHY)

February 21, 2024 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

Impact of an Intervention Combining Fortified Meals and Physical Activity in the Prevention of Undernutrition in Seniors : a Randomized Controlled Trial

In the context of an aging population, preventing undernutrition and its associated risks in the elderly is a major challenge for the coming decade. Undernutrition, a recognized pathology of the elderly, has many negative impacts on the health and well-being of a person. It increases the risk of falls, fractures, pathological episodes and hospitalizations. It induces or aggravates a state of frailty and dependence, ultimately affecting the quality of life and life expectancy of the elderly.

A decline in appetite and insufficient food intake are key factors in the risk of undernutrition. Contrary to popular belief, energy and protein requirements do not decrease with age and are sometimes higher for the elderly than for younger people. However, several studies have shown that caloric and protein intakes are lower than recommended for the elderly. This decrease in appetite is also accompanied by a decrease in micronutrient intake. Inadequate micronutrient intakes are associated with the onset or more rapid progression of age-related diseases. For example, inadequate intakes of lipophilic micronutrients (carotenoids, fat-soluble vitamins A, D and E, long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids) are associated with a more rapid onset or worsening of age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

In order to prevent undernutrition, a major challenge is to allow elderly people with a poor appetite to cover their nutritional needs. Meal fortification, which consists of adding ingredients with high nutritional value to foods and beverages commonly consumed by the elderly, is a promising strategy. It allows for better adaptation to the preferences of the elderly, who are often reluctant to change their consumption habits. However, meal fortification remains largely unknown and underutilized. In parallel, several studies have shown that a high adherence to the Mediterranean diet, which is characterized by a high intake of these micronutrients, is associated with a 40% reduction in the risk of progression to AMD.

Finally, there is a strong link between physical activity and nutrition to prevent muscle wasting in the elderly. Indeed, the results show that an intervention combining protein supplementation and physical exercise has a greater effect on muscle protein synthesis than protein supplementation alone. However, advancing age is frequently accompanied by a decrease in physical activity and an increase in sedentary lifestyle.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

209

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • CHU Dijon Bourgogne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Person over 70 years of age
  • Person living at home or in a relative's home
  • Person with low level of physical activity (no more than 30 minutes of exercise for at least 2 days per week)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Person with a prescription for an oral nutritional supplement
  • Anyone with allergies or intolerances to foods/ingredients used in the fortified foods
  • Anyone with an aversion to fish
  • Anyone on a restrictive diet or vegan/vegetarian diet
  • Persons on a texture modified diet (blended, pureed)
  • Person requiring enteral or parenteral nutrition
  • Person suffering from dysphagia
  • Person in a wheelchair
  • Persons on special diets (texture modified, enteral, parenteral)
  • Person under legal protection (guardianship, trusteeship)
  • Person under a legal protection measure
  • A person who is incapable or unable to give consent
  • Person who is not affiliated or not a beneficiary of a social security system
  • Person in a period of exclusion from a previous study

Secondary exclusion criteria :

  • Person who is malnourished (MNA Long-Form score < 17)
  • Person with low cognitive abilities (MMSE < 20) without a caregiver
  • Person with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2
  • Person with balance disorders (Get up and Go test execution time > 20 seconds or time in unipodal balance < 5 seconds).
  • Person suffering from an acute pathology that can influence the vital prognosis (cancer, renal failure with dialysis...)
  • Person suffering from chronic neuropsychological disorders altering the decisional capacities without the help of a close relative.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: control
Experimental: fortification (FOR)
The nutritional intervention will be based on the following 4 elements: nutritional follow-up by a dietician, fortified meals, tender and juicy meat dishes and fish dishes
Experimental: fortification + physical activity (FAP)
The nutritional intervention will be based on the following 4 elements: nutritional follow-up by a dietician, fortified meals, tender and juicy meat dishes and fish dishes
The physical activity intervention will be based on the following 2 elements: Follow-up with a trainer for adapted exercise and physical exercise instruction sheets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Weight gain or loss
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 months
Through study completion, an average of 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 27, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 27, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VAN WYMELBEKE ERA 2020

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Senior

Clinical Trials on nutritional intervention

Subscribe