- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05749952
Digital Weight Bearing Shape Capture Socket Technology (DWB)
Digital Weight Bearing Shape Capture Socket Technology to Preserve Limb Health and Improve Rehabilitation Outcomes
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study will compare the use of Symphonie Aqua Digital System, which is a new way to create a socket for prosthetics, to the current method that is generally used to create sockets. The study will look at the differences in comfort and fit between the Symphonie Aqua Digital System and the current standard of care (SOC).
The study will determine if Symphonie Aqua Digital System, a new method of socket creation, in a weight-bearing environment, may produce more successful fitting and comfortability & functional outcomes than traditional sockets (non-weight bearing scanning). Additionally, the study will determine if a well-fitting socket will positively impact the overall health of amputee residual limb.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ages 18 and above
- Unilateral trans-tibial amputees
- Ambulate at a K3 level or higher
- At least 3 months post-amputation per physician discretion
- Trans-tibial limb length greater than 4.5 inches in length
- Able to follow directions and independently give informed consent
- Must be able to ambulate without assistance
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 18 years
- Conditions that prevent wearing a prosthetic socket
- Soc Socket made with weight bearing system
- Cognitive deficits or mental health problems that would limit ability to consent and participate fully in the study protocol
- Women who are pregnant or who plan to become pregnant in the near future
- Weight > 280 lbs
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Symphonie Aqua System - Non-Digital (Socket B)
A digital weight bearing test socket where shape capturing is done in full weight bearing
|
For socket fabrication, the shape capturing is done in full weight bearing.
|
|
Active Comparator: Standard of Care (SoC)
This is standard of care socket design where sockets are fabricated in non-weight bearing position
|
For socket fabrication, the shape capturing is done in full weight bearing.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Trans-Epidermal Water Loss (TEWL)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Differences between two systems and effects on Trans-Epidermal Water Loss (TEWL) will be measured by placing a non-invasive probe on the surface of the skin.
Each measurement takes approximately 7-30 seconds each.
The data is presented as g x m^-2xh^-1.
Higher number indicates worse outcome.
|
6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Laser Speckle Imaging (LSI)
Time Frame: 6-weeks
|
Differences between two systems and effects on blood flow will be measured using Laser Speckle Imaging (LSI) which is a non-invasive machine that uses light to capture the blood flow of participants residual limb.
The blood flow (perfusion) data is expressed as perfusion units (PU) where PU is a relative, dimensionless measure of tissue blood flow or microvascular perfusion.
Higher value indicates better perfusion (increase in blood flow).
|
6-weeks
|
|
In-socket Pressure
Time Frame: 6-weeks
|
Measurements of socket pressure will be evaluated using in-socket sensors, which are positioned into the socket and function to detect the amount of residual load (pressure) that is placed on the limb.
|
6-weeks
|
|
Mobility (6MWT)
Time Frame: 6-weeks
|
6-minute walking test (6MWT); Subject will walk for 6 consecutive minutes and, once the 6 minutes has elapsed, the distance covered will be measured.
|
6-weeks
|
|
Balance During Ambulation (TUG)
Time Frame: 6-weeks
|
Timed up and go test; In the timed up-and-go outcome, the patient rises from a seated position, walks three meters at a self-selected speed, turns around, and returns to the chair where they reseat themselves.
|
6-weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sashwati Roy, PhD., Indiana University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 15478
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Amputation
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabUniversity of AlbertaActive, not recruitingAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, Traumatic | Amputation; Traumatic, LimbUnited States
-
Liberating Technologies, Inc.Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedAmputation | Prosthesis User | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, CongenitalUnited States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Limb | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Upper Limb Amputation at the WristUnited States
-
Medipol UniversityRecruitingEvaluation of Functionality of Amputees According to the Medicare Functional K Classification SystemAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerTurkey
-
Point DesignsEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAmputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, CongenitalUnited States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabRecruitingAmputation | Amputation, Traumatic | Amputation; Traumatic, Limb | Amputation of KneeUnited States
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerItaly
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompleted
-
Liberating Technologies, Inc.Vivonics, Inc.CompletedLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Amputation | Prosthesis User | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, Lower | Limb; Absence, Congenital, Lower | Amputation StumpUnited States