Balanced Multi-Electrolyte Solution Versus Saline Trial for Diabetic KetoAcidosis (BEST-DKA)

September 10, 2025 updated by: The George Institute

Balanced Multi-electrolyte Solution Versus 0.9% Sodium Chloride as Fluid Therapy for Patients Presenting With Moderate to Severe Diabetic Ketoacidosis

The goal of this blinded, cluster cross-over, randomised controlled trial is to determine whether fluid therapy with Plasma-Lyte® 148 increases the number of days alive and days out of hospital to day-28 compared to 0.9% sodium chloride ('0.9% saline') in critically ill patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) and deemed to require admission to a critical care area (ICU, HDU) with moderate to severe diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

DKA is a life-threatening complication of diabetes mellitus, described in patients with both type-1 diabetes, and type-2 diabetes(1). Data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare suggest that between 2009-10 to 2014-15, there has been a 21% increase in the hospitalisation amongst young people with DKA(2). An interrogation of the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcomes Research (CORE) database revealed that the incidence of ICU admission of patients with DKA in Australia and New Zealand increased 5-fold between 2000 and 2013 (0.97/100000, 95%CI 0.84 to1.10) in 2000 to (5.3/100000, 95%CI 4.98to 5.53, (P<0.0001)(3).

Increasing incidences were observed predominantly in rural and metropolitan hospitals (Figure 1), about 88% of the admissions to the ICU were from the ED. The median (IQR) ICU and hospital length of stay were 1.8 (1-2.8) and 4 (2.6-7.4) days respectively. Recent data from the ANZICS-CORE database confirmed the persistent high admission rate of severe DKA to Australian ICUs - 2849 and 2862 admissions in 2019 and 2020.

A major review of DKA management protocols in 2017 concluded that there are major deficiencies in evidence for optimal management of DKA(33). Current practice is guided by weak evidence and consensus opinion.

Studies comparing Plasma-Lyte® 148 vs. 0.9% saline in DKA demonstrate a trend towards a more rapid resolution of acidosis, equivalent glucose control and stable ketones with Plasma-Lyte® 148. In addition, there are trends towards reduced length of ICU and hospital stay with the use of Plasma-Lyte® 148.

Given the clinical uncertainty and substantial variability in practice. there is a scientific, clinical and health economic imperative to conduct a high-fidelity study to provide definitive evidence to inform clinicians regarding the choice of resuscitation fluids for patients with DKA. BEST-DKA will address this critical knowledge gap.

BEST-DKA is a multi-centre, blinded, cluster-crossover trial conducted in 20 Australian hospitals, consisting of two 12-month intervention periods with a one-month inter-period gap.

Each hospital is a single cluster, with all patients admitted with DKA to that hospital's ED during the intervention periods will potentially be eligible for inclusion in the trial. After the first 12-month intervention period during which recruited patients will receive either Plasma-Lyte® 148 or 0.9% saline, there will be a one-month inter-period gap during which patients will not be recruited into the trial. Following this each critical care area will change to using the fluid to which they were not assigned for the first period (Figure 4). All included patients will receive blinded fluids (Plasma-Lyte® 148 or 0.9% saline) as part of their DKA therapy depending on the fluid assigned to the site for the relevant intervention period.

Both study fluids are manufactured by Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd (Old Toongabbie, NSW) and will be labelled, packed and distributed by the company directly to the study sites in periodic shipments. Study fluid will be coded and labelled in compliance with applicable regulations, and in a manner that protects the blinding.

All clinicians involved in the prescription of blinded study treatment must read Product Information for both Plasma-Lyte® 148 and 0.9% saline which provide detailed information about the composition, indications, side effects, suggested dosage and contraindications of the study treatments.

The volume and rate of blinded study fluid administered will be guided by the standard clinical endpoints determined by the treating clinician. Study treatments will be started following study enrolment and continue until discharge from a critical care area or for a maximum of 72 hrs, whichever is earlier. If patients are re-admitted to the critical care area within 72 hours with a relapse of ketoacidosis, the clinician may use open label fluids for the managements of ketoacidosis. within 72 hours they will continue to receive blinded treatment fluid. Glucose containing solutions can be added in as required for blood glucose or ketosis management. The use of bicarbonate therapy and the need for potassium, phosphate and magnesium supplementation will be at the discretion of the treating clinician and data on its use will be collected.

The primary outcome will be evaluated at day-28 and patients contacted via telephone.

End-user/consumer representatives have been involved in all components of the research program including protocol development, choice of primary outcome, funding applications, and membership of the management committee. End-user/consumer representatives will continue to be involved in the conduct of the study and play a key role in the dissemination of results. Currently, membership of the study management committee includes the President of the advocacy group, Diabetes Australia; Director of Australian Centre for Accelerating Diabetes Innovations (ACADI); and a consumer who lives with diabetes.

This study aligns with the Medical Research Future Fund (Australia Government grant) funded ACADI objective to address the acute complications of diabetes including management of DKA.

The study has been endorsed by the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and a letter of support from for the study from Diabetes Australia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

680

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia, 2148
        • Recruiting
        • Blacktown Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Richard McNulty
      • Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
      • Dubbo, New South Wales, Australia, 2830
      • Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia, 2217
        • Recruiting
        • St George Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Manoj Saxena
      • Metford, New South Wales, Australia, 2323
      • Orange, New South Wales, Australia, 2800
        • Recruiting
        • Orange Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fiona Shields
      • St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia, 2065
        • Recruiting
        • Royal North Shore Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anthony Delaney
        • Contact:
      • Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
        • Recruiting
        • Westmead Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Vineet Nayyar
        • Contact:
    • Queensland
      • Birtinya, Queensland, Australia, 4575
        • Recruiting
        • Sunshine Coast University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David Gutierrez
      • Caboolture, Queensland, Australia
        • Recruiting
        • Caboolture Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mahesh Ramanan
      • Coopers Plains, Queensland, Australia, 4108
        • Recruiting
        • Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David Stewart
        • Contact:
      • Redcliffe, Queensland, Australia, 4020
        • Recruiting
        • Redcliffe Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alexis Tabah
      • Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia, 4700
        • Recruiting
        • Rockhampton Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Antony Attokaran
      • Southport, Queensland, Australia, 4215
        • Recruiting
        • Gold Coast University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gerben Keijzers
    • South Australia
      • Elizabeth Vale, South Australia, Australia, 5112
        • Recruiting
        • Lyell McEwin Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Vishwanath Biradar
      • Woodville South, South Australia, Australia, 5011
        • Recruiting
        • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sandra Peake
        • Contact:
    • Victoria
      • Ballarat, Victoria, Australia, 3350
        • Recruiting
        • Ballarat Base Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mark Kubicki
      • Berwick, Victoria, Australia, 3806
        • Recruiting
        • Monash Health-Casey Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Umesh Kadam
      • Dandenong, Victoria, Australia, 3175
        • Recruiting
        • Dandenong Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ashwin Subramaniam
      • Frankston, Victoria, Australia, 3199
        • Recruiting
        • Frankston Hospital - Peninsula Health
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Claire Michel
      • Traralgon, Victoria, Australia, 3844
        • Recruiting
        • Latrobe Regional Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pritish Korula

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in the ED with a primary diagnosis of moderate to severe DKA for whom both saline and Plasma-Lyte® 148 are considered appropriate fluids
  • Blood glucose level > 14mmol/L
  • pH < 7.25
  • Serum bicarbonate <15 mmol/L
  • Elevated anion gap > 12mEq/L
  • Ketones positive on finger prick measurements
  • In the judgement of the treating clinician critical care area admission is required

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Patients who have received more than 2000ml of non study fluid prior to study enrolment
  • Serum Na > 155 or <120 mmol/L
  • Contraindication to either study fluid e.g. previous allergic reaction to Plasma-Lyte® 148
  • Patients with hyperosmotic hyperglycaemic non-ketotic syndrome
  • Other clinical conditions that preclude large volumes of fluid resuscitation
  • Previous inclusion in BEST-DKA trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Plasma-Lyte® 148
Plasma-Lyte® 148 fluid 1L given intravenously for fluid replacement
Plasma-Lyte® 148 intravenous fluid for resuscitation in patients with keto-acidosis
Other Names:
  • Balanced multi-electrolyte solution
Active Comparator: 0.9% sodium chloride
Normal saline fluid 1L given intravenously for fluid replacement
0.9% sodium chloride intravenous fluid for resuscitation in patients with keto-acidosis
Other Names:
  • normal saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital free days (HFD) up to day-28 after study enrolment
Time Frame: from time of enrolment to 28 days
Number of hospital free days from time of hospital discharge
from time of enrolment to 28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICU free days up to 28 days after study enrolment
Time Frame: 28 days after enrolment
Number of ICU free days from time of ICU discharge
28 days after enrolment
ICU and hospital readmissions up to 28 days after study enrolment
Time Frame: 28 days after enrolment
Number of days free from ICU and hospital from time of hospital discharge
28 days after enrolment
Acute kidney injury assessed by comparing serum creatinine using Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria
Time Frame: 28 days after enrolment
injury assessed by comparing change in serum creatinine using Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria
28 days after enrolment
Episodes of post-study enrolment decrease in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) by more than 2 in the first 24 hours
Time Frame: first 24 hours from enrolment
decrease in Glasgow Coma Score by more than 2 points
first 24 hours from enrolment
Time to resolution of ketosis
Time Frame: from time of enrolment to day 28
resolution of acidosis
from time of enrolment to day 28
Cumulative insulin dosage in the first 48 hours
Time Frame: first 48 hours from time of enrolment
Total amount of insulin given to the patient from enrolment to 48 hours
first 48 hours from time of enrolment
Duration of IV insulin infusion
Time Frame: from time of enrolment to day 28
Total amount of IV insulin given to the patient from time of enrolment to day 28
from time of enrolment to day 28
Cumulative potassium replacement
Time Frame: from time of enrolment to day 28
Total amount of potassium given to the patient from time of enrolment to day 28
from time of enrolment to day 28

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: from time of enrolment to day 28
Calculation of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios
from time of enrolment to day 28

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 14, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Clinical Trials on Plasma-Lyte 148

Subscribe