Anti Reflux Mucosal Ablation Therapy in PPI Dependent GERD (APDG)

March 8, 2023 updated by: Mohamed Abdelhafez, Technical University of Munich

Anti Reflux Mucosal Ablation Therapy in PPI Dependent GERD: a Prospective Randomized, Single-blinded, Sham-controlled Trial

This is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, interventional, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic anti reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) in PPI dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in comparison to controls with a sham procedure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria and, after informed consent, are willing to participate in this study will be prepared for ARMA. After sedation the patients will be randomized equally into an intervention and control Group. The patients are blinded to the procedure. The Patients in the intervention group receive ARMA using argon plasma coagulation (APC) at the gastroesophageal junction (EGJ) in two semicircular patterns while the control group receives a sham procedure. The approximate duration of the procedure is 30min. After the procedure the patients receive follow up controls at 2, 4, 6 and 12 months. During the first follow up, 2 months after the procedure symptoms are evaluated by questionnaires (GERD- HRQL, FSSG, VAG). Subsequently the PPI- medication is stopped in all patients until the end of the study or worsening of symptoms. During the second follow up 4 months after the initial procedure the symptoms are reevaluated by questionnaires. The patients are then unblinded and are told if they received ARMA or sham procedure. Those patients who received ARMA are examined by esophagogastroduodenoscopy, esophageal manometry and pH metry. Further assessments is performed by questionnaires 6 and 12 months after the initial procedure.

Those patients in the control group are allowed to take part in a crossover to receive the ARMA procedure as well. If they receive ARMA, symptoms are reevaluated 2 months after the procedure by questionnaires, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, esophageal manometry and pH metry. Further controls are performed after 4, 6 and 12 months by questionnaires.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Bayern
      • Munich, Bayern, Germany, 81675
        • Recruiting
        • II Medizinische Klinik am Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PPI dependent GERD for at least 6 months
  • Pathological esophageal acid exposure, defined by DeMeester score >14.7 or acid exposure time (AET) >4.2% in pH metry while off PPI
  • Exclusion of primary esophageal motility disorders by manometry
  • Upper endoscopy with biopsy (Exclusion of eosinophilic esophagitis)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Sliding hiatal hernia >3cm
  • Los Angeles grade C/D esophagitis
  • Primary esophageal motility disorders
  • Grade IV Hill´s flap valve
  • Pregnancy or planed pregnancy in the next 12 months
  • Eosinophilic esophagitis
  • Paraesophageal hernia
  • Previous esophageal or gastric surgery
  • Barretts esophagus
  • Liver cirrhosis
  • Varices
  • Lack of consent
  • ASA physical status >III

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Anti reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA)
Patients randomized into the intervention arm receive ARMA and a follow up control after 2, 4, 6 and 12 months. PPI treatment is stopped after 2 months until the end of the study or worsening of symptoms. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy, manometry and pH metry is performed after 4 months.

In patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria and being randomized for ARMA, the procedure using argon plasma coagulation involves two semicircular ablations of the mucosa of the EGJ in a butterfly shape of a width of 2 cm. The approximate duration of the procedure is 30min.

Follow includes objective evaluation of reflux disease by reflux questionnaires, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, esophageal manometry, pH metry.

Sham Comparator: Sham procedure
Patients randomized into the sham procedure arm receive a esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same setting as if ARMA would be performed. Patients in the Control group receive follow up controls after 2 and 4 months and after unblinding after 4 months are allowed to perform a crossover to receive ARMA. PPI treatment is stopped 2 months after the initial sham procedure until the end of the study or worsening of symptoms. If the patients receive ARMA as a crossover reevaluation is performed 2, 4, 6 and 12 months after the actual ARMA procedure.
In patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria and being randomized for sham procedure, the procedure involves esophagogastroduodenoscopy with the same set of movements and duration as the ARMA procedure without the actual ablation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease
Time Frame: 4 months
Improvement in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease by more than 50% from baseline in GERD-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (GERD- HRQL) at 4 months after procedure. Total score 0-50; higher scores indicate greater complaints.
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease in GERD-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (GERD- HRQL) at 6 and 12 months. Total score 0-50; higher scores indicate greater complaints.
12 months
Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease in regurgitation score at 4, 6 and 12 months. Total score 0-30; higher scores indicate greater complaints.
12 months
Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease in Frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG) at 4, 6 and 12 months. Total score 0-48; higher scores indicate greater complaints.
12 months
Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease in visual analog scale (VAS) at 4, 6 and 12 months. Total score 0-10; higher scores indicate greater complaints.
12 months
Complication rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Recording of all complications in relation to the ARMA- procedure
12 months
PPI dependency
Time Frame: 12 months
Requirement and dose of PPI at 4, 6 and 12 months
12 months
Change in esophageal acid exposure at 4 months after ARMA
Time Frame: 4 months after ARMA
Change in esophageal acid exposure in pH metry 4 months after ARMA
4 months after ARMA
Change in lower esophageal sphincter pressure 4 months after ARMA
Time Frame: 4 months after ARMA
Change in lower esophageal sphincter pressure in manometry 4 months after ARMA
4 months after ARMA
Postinterventional pain
Time Frame: 1day
Recording of postinterventional pain in visual analog scale (VAS). Higher scores indicate greater complaints.
1day
Changes in cardia morphology
Time Frame: 4 months after ARMA
Changes in Hill's flap grade
4 months after ARMA
Technical success rate
Time Frame: 1 day
Successful completion of ARMA
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed Abdelhafez, MD, Universitiy Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical Universitiy Munich

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

March 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastroesophageal Reflux

Clinical Trials on Anti reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA)

Subscribe