- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05765474
Motor Learning for Upper Limb Hemiparesis After Stroke
September 8, 2025 updated by: Dawn Nilsen, Columbia University
Motor Learning for Individuals With Upper Limb Hemiparesis After Stroke
The purpose of this research is to learn about practice conditions that may benefit stroke survivors when learning to use their more affected arm to perform a task.
Participants will be randomized into two groups.
Experimental and control groups will differ by one practice variable that will not be disclosed until completion of testing procedures.
Participants will practice a motor task using both their more and less affected arms for two consecutive days.
A Pre-Test will be administered on Day 1 before the training begins.
Immediate Transfer of Learning will be administered on Day 2 after the completion of training.
Delayed (24-hour) Retention and Transfer Tests will be administered on Day 3.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Stroke involves loss of blood flow to the brain and can cause impaired upper limb motor function, resulting in long term disability.
Targeted motor learning interventions can improve skill acquisition and functional upper limb use after stroke.
For example, repetitive practice of a motor task has been shown to improve motor learning outcomes.
However, more research is currently needed to identify important active ingredients in complex motor learning interventions and determine the most effective approaches for improving upper limb recovery after stroke.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of a specific practice variable on motor learning for individuals with upper limb hemiparesis after stroke.
This research will inform the development of future stroke rehabilitation interventions aimed at improving skill acquisition and motor learning.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
28
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 6 months following stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic)
- Upper limb weakness resulting from the stroke
- Able to follow 2-step commands
- Box and Block test score of 3-60
- Intact proprioception at the index finger of the weaker arm
- English speaking
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe neglect (Score of 2 on extinction and inattention items of NIHSS)
- Arm pain that limits movement or loss of functional range of movement (contracture)
- Unable to give informed consent
- Received Botox within the past 3-months
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Training with Practice Variable
All participants will practice a motor task (the Scooping Task) for 2 consecutive days.
Each day of training, participants will complete 50 trials (10 blocks of 5 trials each) with their more affected arm and 20 trials (10 blocks of 2 trials each) with their less affected arm.
One trial of the task will involve using a spoon to scoop beans, one at a time, from one cup to another while seated at a table.
Participants will be asked to complete as many scoops as possible from the cup closest to them to the cup farthest from them within 30 seconds in an anterior-posterior direction.
One successful repetition occurs when at least one bean is transferred.
The number of successful repetitions within a 30 second trial is then counted.
Training for the experimental group will include the practice variable of interest.
|
This group receives the practice variable.
The practice variable being studied will not be disclosed until completion of testing procedures.
|
|
Other: Training without Practice Variable
All participants will practice a motor task (the Scooping Task) for 2 consecutive days.
Each day of training, participants will complete 50 trials (10 blocks of 5 trials each) with their more affected arm and 20 trials (10 blocks of 2 trials each) with their less affected arm.
One trial of the task will involve using a spoon to scoop beans, one at a time, from one cup to another while seated at a table.
Participants will be asked to complete as many scoops as possible from the cup closest to them to the cup farthest from them within 30 seconds in an anterior-posterior direction.
One successful repetition occurs when at least one bean is transferred.
The number of successful repetitions within a 30 second trial is then counted.
Training for the control group will not include the practice variable of interest.
|
This group does not receive the practice variable.
The practice variable being studied will not be disclosed until completion of testing procedures.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
24-Hour Retention Test: Number of completed scoops (more affected arm)
Time Frame: Day 3
|
This is a 24-hour Retention Test of the trained motor task (the Scooping Task) that the participant practiced for 2 days.
The participant is asked to use a spoon to scoop beans from one cup to another in an anterior-posterior direction, away from their body, for 30 seconds.
One completed scoop occurs when at least one bean is transferred to the second cup.
The score is the number of completed scoops that occur within 30 seconds.
The participant will complete two blocks of five trials (30 seconds each).
The number of completed scoops will be averaged across blocks of trials.
|
Day 3
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Immediate Transfer Test: Number of transported cubes (more affected arm)
Time Frame: Day 2
|
This is an Immediate Transfer Test that will be administered on Day 2 following completion of training on the Scooping Task.
The participant is asked to transport cubes in an anterior-posterior direction away from their body, using the Box and Block Test apparatus, for 30 seconds.
The score is the number of cubes that are transported within 30 seconds.
The participant will complete two blocks of five trials (30 seconds each).
The number of transported cubes will be averaged across blocks of trials.
|
Day 2
|
|
24-Hour Transfer Test: Number of transported cubes (more affected arm)
Time Frame: Day 3
|
This is a 24-Hour Transfer Test that will be administered on Day 3. The participant is asked to transport cubes in an anterior-posterior direction away from their body, using the Box and Block Test apparatus, for 30 seconds.
The score is the number of cubes that are transported within 30 seconds.
The participant will complete two blocks of five trials (30 seconds each).
The number of transported cubes will be averaged across blocks of trials.
|
Day 3
|
|
Self-Efficacy Rating for Scooping Task
Time Frame: Day 2
|
After completing training on Day 2, the participant will be asked to rate their confidence in achieving various scores on the trained motor task (the Scooping Task).
Self-Efficacy will be rated using a 10 point scale (0 = Not confident at all; 10 = Very confident) with higher scores indicating a better outcomes.
Scores will be calculated by averaging Self-Efficacy ratings.
|
Day 2
|
|
Rating of Mood
Time Frame: Day 2
|
After completing training on Day 2, participants will be asked to rate their mood using the valence subscale of the Self-Assessment Manikin, which is a non-verbal assessment of affect that has five pictures of smiling, neutral, and frowning faces.
The participant rates their mood using a 9 point scale based on the pictures (1 = More positive affect; 9 = Less positive affect) with lower scores indicating a better outcome.
|
Day 2
|
|
Interest/Enjoyment Subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory
Time Frame: Day 2
|
After completing training on Day 2, the participant will complete items from the interest/enjoyment subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory.
This is an assessment of participant's subjective experience of the Scooping Task.
Participants will rate each statement according to how true it is for them, using a 7 point scale (1 = Not true at all; 7 = Very true).
Higher scores indicate greater interest/enjoyment when practicing the task (better outcome).
Scores are calculated by averaging the item scores of the subscale.
|
Day 2
|
|
Perceived Competence Subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory
Time Frame: Day 2
|
After completing training on Day 2, the participant will complete items from the perceived competence subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory.
This is an assessment of participant's subjective experience of the Scooping Task.
Participants will rate each statement according to how true it is for them, using a 7 point scale (1 = Not true at all; 7 = Very true).
Higher scores indicate greater perceived competence when practicing the task (better outcome).
Scores are calculated by averaging the item scores of the subscale.
|
Day 2
|
|
Perceived Choice Subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory
Time Frame: Day 2
|
After completing training on Day 2, the participant will complete items from the perceived choice subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory.
This is an assessment of participant's subjective experience of the Scooping Task.
Participants will rate each statement according to how true it is for them, using a 7 point scale (1 = Not true at all; 7 = Very true).
Higher scores indicate greater perceived choice when practicing the task (better outcome).
Scores are calculated by averaging the item scores of the subscale.
|
Day 2
|
|
Value Subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory
Time Frame: Day 2
|
After completing training on Day 2, the participant will complete items from the value subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory.
This is an assessment of participant's subjective experience of the Scooping Task.
Participants will rate each statement according to how true it is for them, using a 7 point scale (1 = Not true at all; 7 = Very true).
Higher scores indicate greater value associated with the task (better outcome).
Scores are calculated by averaging the item scores of the subscale.
|
Day 2
|
|
Effort Subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory
Time Frame: Day 2
|
After completing training on Day 2, the participant will complete items from the effort subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory.
This is an assessment of participant's subjective experience of the Scooping Task.
Participants will rate each statement according to how true it is for them, using a 7 point scale (1 = Not true at all; 7 = Very true).
Higher scores indicate greater effort associated with the task (better outcome).
Scores are calculated by averaging the item scores of the subscale.
|
Day 2
|
|
Pressure/Tension Subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory
Time Frame: Day 2
|
After completing training on Day 2, the participant will complete items from the pressure/tension subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory.
This is an assessment of participant's subjective experience of the Scooping Task.
Participants will rate each statement according to how true it is for them, using a 7 point scale (1 = Not true at all; 7 = Very true).
Higher scores indicate greater pressure/tension when practicing the task (worse outcome).
Scores are calculated by averaging the item scores of the subscale.
|
Day 2
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
24-Hour Retention Test: Number of completed scoops (less affected arm)
Time Frame: Day 3
|
This is a 24-hour Retention Test of the trained motor task (the Scooping Task) that the participant practiced for 2 days.
The participant is asked to use a spoon to scoop beans from one cup to another in an anterior-posterior direction, away from their body, for 30 seconds.
One completed scoop occurs when at least one bean is transferred to the second cup.
The score is the number of completed scoops that occur within 30 seconds.
The participant will complete two blocks of two trials (30 seconds each).
The number of completed scoops will be averaged across blocks of trials.
|
Day 3
|
|
Immediate Transfer Test: Number of transported cubes (less affected arm)
Time Frame: Day 2
|
This is an Immediate Transfer Test that will be administered on Day 2 following completion of training on the Scooping Task.
The participant is asked to transport cubes in an anterior-posterior direction away from their body, using the Box and Block Test apparatus, for 30 seconds.
The score is the number of cubes that are transported within 30 seconds.
The participant will complete two blocks of two trials (30 seconds each).
The number of transported cubes will be averaged across blocks of trials.
|
Day 2
|
|
24-Hour Transfer Test: Number of transported cubes (less affected arm)
Time Frame: Day 3
|
This is a 24-Hour Transfer Test that will be administered on Day 3. The participant is asked to transport cubes in an anterior-posterior direction away from their body, using the Box and Block Test apparatus, for 30 seconds.
The score is the number of cubes that are transported within 30 seconds.
The participant will complete two blocks of two trials (30 seconds each).
The number of transported cubes will be averaged across blocks of trials.
|
Day 3
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dawn Nilsen, EdD, Columbia University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 22, 2023
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 16, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
February 16, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 1, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
March 13, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
September 12, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 8, 2025
Last Verified
August 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAU1704
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | ExoskeletonSouth Korea
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
Clinical Trials on Practice Variable
-
Masaryk UniversityCzech-BioImaging; Wroclaw University of Health and Sport SciencesRecruitingNeuroplasticity in Motor LearningCzechia
-
Teachers College, Columbia UniversityCompletedParkinson Disease | DysphagiaUnited States
-
Adelante, Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation...Maastricht University; Adelante rehabilitation CentreCompleted
-
Indiana UniversityCompleted
-
Technische Universität DresdenMedical University of Vienna; University Hospital, Montpellier; University of... and other collaboratorsTerminatedAcute Lung Injury | Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome | at Least 24 h of Controlled Mechanical VentilationGermany
-
New Mexico State UniversityUniversity of Texas; Paso del Norte Health Foundation; Brigham Young University; Ysleta Independent School District, El PasoCompletedPsychology, Social | Nutrition | Behavioral ChangesUnited States
-
Nanjing Medical UniversityCompletedDepression | Anxiety | ResilienceChina
-
Technische Universität DresdenCompletedDevelopment of Pulmonary Dysfunction Following Open Abdominal SurgeryGermany
-
Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyEnrolling by invitationTranstibial Amputation - UnilateralUnited States
-
University of PernambucoConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCompletedGait | Postural BalanceBrazil