Ketamine Versus Neostigmine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine During Ultrasound-guided Serratus Anterior Block

March 26, 2023 updated by: Aya Hisham, Ain Shams University

Analgesic Efficacy of Ketamine Versus Neostigmine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine During Ultrasound-guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy

This study is designed to investigate the analgesic efficacy of ketamine compared to neostigmine as adjuvants to LA in ultrasound guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) in patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy. We hypothesize that adding either neostigmine or ketamine to bupivacaine in ultrasound guided SAPB would increase the total analgesic duration and decrease the total 24 hr postoperative Nalbuphine consumption compared to SAPB with bupivacaine only. The first 24 hr of postoperative Nalbuphine consumption is set as the primary outcome. The time of the first request of analgesia, pain score, side effects of drugs and patient hemodynamics are set as the secondary outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Ainshams university hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA II patients, BMI< 35Kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal of participation, ASA III or above, history of allergy to the study drugs, BMI> 35kg/m2, coagulation disorders, psychiatric illnesses that may interfere with pain evaluation, epileptic patients, patients with tachy or brady arrthymias, patients with increased intracranial tension

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: group 1
consists of patients receiving Serratus anterior plane block using Bupivacaine + Ketamine.
testing the effect of adding ketamine versus neostigmine to the analgesic efficacy of serratus anterior plane block in modified radical mastectomy surgeries
Active Comparator: group 2
consists of patients receiving Serratus anterior plane block using Bupivacaine + neostigmine.
testing the effect of adding ketamine versus neostigmine to the analgesic efficacy of serratus anterior plane block in modified radical mastectomy surgeries
Placebo Comparator: group 3
consists of patients receiving Serratus anterior plane block using Bupivacaine + normal saline.
testing the effect of adding ketamine versus neostigmine to the analgesic efficacy of serratus anterior plane block in modified radical mastectomy surgeries

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
analgsic consumption
Time Frame: first 24 hours postoperative
total amount of consumed nalbuphine
first 24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time to rescue analgesia
Time Frame: first 24 hours postoperative
first time to request rescue analgesia
first 24 hours postoperative
pain scores
Time Frame: first 24 hours postoperative
pain scores measured by numerical pain score chart
first 24 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mohammed S Abd El Aziz, M.D., AinShams University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Operative Pain

Clinical Trials on Adjuvants, Anesthesia

Subscribe