Beta-Agonist Versus OnabotulinumtoxinA Trial for Urgency Urinary Incontinence (BEST)

September 19, 2025 updated by: Vivian Sung, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare treatment outcomes between an oral medication (beta agonist) versus onabotulinumtoxinA injections in women with urgency urinary incontinence (UUI).

Participants will be randomly selected to receive one of the two treatments. The primary outcome measure will be at 3 months, and women will be followed for a total of 12 months.

Based on patient expert input, there are 2 primary outcomes: Treatment satisfaction and urinary symptom severity.

The study will also have a long-term follow-up component (prospective cohort) including 346 participants from the parent trial to describe treatment continuation, treatment efficacy, patient direct costs and other secondary outcomes up to 5 years after treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to directly compare 2 primary outcomes (Treatment satisfaction and urinary symptom severity) between beta agonist oral medication versus onabotulinumtoxinA intradetrusor bladder injection for the treatment of UUI.

The study will also compare secondary outcomes identified as important by patients. At the end of the study, the investigators will have patient and stakeholder-derived comparative outcomes between these 2 commonly available treatment categories. A stakeholder and community engagement (CE) plan will be developed and implemented. The investigators will also develop a model to help guide patients and providers through this decision process.

SPECIFIC AIMS Specific Aim 1: Compare the efficacy of beta agonist versus onabotulinumtoxinA on patient-important treatment outcomes at 3 months in women with UUI.

This multi-center, randomized clinical trial (RCT) includes 5 sites across the U.S. Two co-primary outcomes will be measured using validated patient-reported outcomes (PROs), selected by patients: Co-primary outcome 1: Symptom severity, measured by change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Symptom Bother Scale (OAB-q-SS) score.

Co-primary outcome 2: Treatment satisfaction, measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-General (FACIT-TS-G), powered based on a single item.

Specific Aim 2: Compare secondary patient-important outcomes. Direct comparisons between intervention effects on secondary outcomes chosen by patients and stakeholders, including adverse events, UUI quality of life, global improvement, and sexual function.

Specific Aim 3: Use predictive modeling to help stakeholders better determine expected outcomes after treatment with beta agonist versus onabotulinumtoxinA.

Comparators: Beta agonist oral medication (mirabegron or vibegron) versus intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA.

Both beta-agonists and onabotulinumtoxinA are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of UUI, and widely available options with established efficacy.

432 women will be randomly assigned to each treatment option: 216 to beta agonist oral medication and 216 to intradetrusor onabotulintoxinA. Women will be undergo outcomes assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The primary outcome measure will be at 3 months.

For the long-term follow up study, a prospective cohort of 346 study participants of the parent trial who agree will be followed with additional outcome assessments for 3-5 years. Outcomes for the long-term follow up study will include: continuation/discontinuation of treatment, treatment satisfaction and symptom control, treatment crossover, additional treatments, patient-important complications, costs, and understanding barriers to continued long-term UUI care and possible solutions. Qualitative methods will be expanded to further explore barriers to continuing long-term UUI care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

432

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Ann Meers, BS, RN
  • Phone Number: 48228 401-274-1100
  • Email: ameers@wihri.org

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • Recruiting
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Holly Richter, PhD, MD
        • Contact:
          • Gabriella Halder, MD
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92093
        • Recruiting
        • University of California, San Diego
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Emily Lukacz, MD
        • Contact:
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20059
        • Recruiting
        • Howard University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tatiana Sanses, MD
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87131
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02905
        • Recruiting
        • Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria*:

  1. 18 years or older
  2. report at least "quite a bit bothered" or worse by their UUI defined by response to OAB-q-SS item #8 "How bothered are you by urine loss associated with a strong desire to urinate?"
  3. are not and do not plan to become pregnant
  4. have persistent UUI defined as previous unsuccessful results after conservative and anticholinergic treatment, or are unable to tolerate or have contraindications to anticholinergics
  5. are currently not taking anticholinergics or are willing to stop medication for 3 weeks prior to enrollment.
  6. for participants reporting mixed urinary incontinence symptoms, participant must (a) have less bother from SUI than from UUI, defined as a response of "Not at all bothered" or only "a little bit bothered" by SUI on the Urogenital Distress Inventory item "Do you experience urine leakage related to physical activity? (walking, running, laughing, sneezing, coughing), and (b) SUI symptoms be stable (> 3 months), and (c)participant does not desire additional treatment for SUI in the upcoming 3 months.
  7. Participants after unsuccessful neuromodulation trial can be eligible after a 4-week washout period.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. clinical contraindication to beta-3 agonist or onabotulinumtoxinA
  2. prior therapeutic trial of either study treatment
  3. unevaluated hematuria, current or prior bladder malignancy
  4. surgically altered detrusor muscle
  5. prior pelvic radiation
  6. post-void residual >150 mL in past 3 months
  7. neurogenic bladder
  8. pelvic floor surgery within the past 3 months
  9. anticipating pelvic surgery within primary outcome follow up period (3 months)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA
OnabotulinumtoxinA at a dose of 100 units will be injected into the bladder per usual care pathways.
OnabotulinumtoxinA will be prepared by dissolving 100 units into 10 ml of injectable saline. The injection will be an office based procedure, performed per usual care.
Other Names:
  • Botox
Active Comparator: Beta-3 receptor agonist oral medication
Selective beta-3 receptor agonist oral medication approved for the treatment of urgency urinary incontinence including mirabegron or vibegron. Usual clinical care standards will be used for prescribing and dosing changes. For mirabegron, dosages are 25 mg and 50 mg as clinically indicated. For vibegron, dosage is 75 mg daily by mouth as clinically indicated.
The beta-agonist oral medication will be prescribed and dose adjusted per usual care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in score Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Symptom Bother Scale (OAB-q-SS) at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline until 3 months
8-item questionnaire measuring symptom bother of overactive bladder symptoms, higher scores indicate more bothersome symptoms
Baseline until 3 months
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-General Questionnaire (FACIT-TS-G) at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
Single item "How do you rate this treatment overall" on a 5-point likert scale
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Symptom Bother Scale (OAB-q-SS)
Time Frame: Baseline until 6, 9, 12 months
8-item questionnaire measuring symptom bother of overactive bladder symptoms
Baseline until 6, 9, 12 months
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-General Questionnaire (FACIT-TS-G) at 3 months
Time Frame: 6, 9, 12 months
8-item questionnaire assessing treatment satisfaction of adults undergoing treatment for chronic conditions
6, 9, 12 months
Change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Health Related Quality of Life (OAB-q-HRQL)
Time Frame: Baseline to 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Overactive bladder disease specific questionnaire measuring quality of life, higher scores indicate better HRQL
Baseline to 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Change in Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-IR)
Time Frame: Baseline to 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Validated tool assessing female sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders; higher scores reflect better sexual functioning
Baseline to 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I)
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Global measure of patient impression of improvement, likert scale
3, 6, 9, 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PROMIS Cognitive Function-Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline to 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Generic cognitive function measure (8 items), higher scores indicate better function
Baseline to 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Continuation/discontinuation rate
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of long-term follow up 3-5 years for LTF cohort study n=346
Continuation/discontinuation of study assigned treatment
From enrollment to end of long-term follow up 3-5 years for LTF cohort study n=346
Cost
Time Frame: From end of parent trial (12 months) to completion of long-term follow up study (3-5 years) for n=346
Patient direct costs
From end of parent trial (12 months) to completion of long-term follow up study (3-5 years) for n=346

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vivian Sung, MD, MPH, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
  • Principal Investigator: Peter Jeppson, MD, University of New Mexico

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 6, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The de-identified database once cleaned will be available to the team, collaborators, and broader scientific community once the primary paper is published per PCORI recommendations.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Once aims of original protocol are completed

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urgency Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 UNT [Botox]

Subscribe