- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05830786
Virtual Reality in Orthopaedic Surgical Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial (VR-ORS)
Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Orthopaedic Surgical Education: A Multistage Randomized Controlled Trial
Immersive virtual reality (IVR) surgical simulators are increasingly being used for learner education. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy of IVR to hands-on orthopaedic workshop sessions (such as arthroscopy simulators, cadaveric models, and Sawbones®) in various orthopaedic subspecialties (such as sports, arthroplasty, and spine surgery).
Overall, in this multi-stage comprehensive randomized controlled the aim is to assess:
- If IVR simulation using head-mounted displays (HMD) is superior to the current standard of training for orthopaedic surgery residents and medical students.
- Determine if it is feasible to incorporate immersive headset virtual reality simulation into residency training programs and medical school curriculums.
- Assess the longitudinal application of IVR training on medical student and resident surgical education.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Stages:
Stage 1 - Medical students and orthopaedic residents participating in the Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Education Course 2023 (COSMEC) will be selected and computer randomized (1:1) into two groups of experimental (IVR) and control (arthroscopy simulator box), based on level of training. Allocation concealment will be ensured using central randomization. Trainees in both groups will receive a common didactic training for knee arthroscopy. Subsequently, trainees in the experimental group will undergo a IVR surgical training module and trainees in the control group will undergo a similar module using arthroscopy simulator box. Following the training modules, participants will complete knowledge tests, technical skill assessments on knee arthroscopy simulators, and experiential surveys.
Stage 2 - Medical students and orthopaedic residents participating in the 2023 University of Toronto Orthopaedic Surgery bootcamp will be selected and computer randomized (1:1) into two groups of experimental (IVR) and control (sawbones), based on level of training. Allocation concealment will be ensured using central randomization. Trainees in both groups will receive a common didactic training for femoral intramedullary nail (IMN) placement. Subsequently, trainees in the experimental group will undergo a IVR surgical training module and trainees in the control group will undergo a similar module using Sawbones ®. Following the training modules, participants will complete knowledge tests, technical skill assessments on cadaveric models, and experiential surveys.
Stage 3 - The protocol explained in stage 1 and 2 may be repeated for various orthopaedic sub-speciality (including arthroplasty and spine surgery) for the participants in the booth camp.
Stage 4 - All trainees may then be followed longitudinally over the course 6 months. Trainees' performance may be evaluated for procedures in which training was provided, based on preceptor evaluations (for example by completing standardised evaluation forms) on a voluntary basis.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Robert Koucheki, MD
- Phone Number: 416-619-5546
- Email: Robert.koucheki@mail.utoronto.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Johnathan R Lex, MB ChB
- Phone Number: 416-619-5546
- Email: Johnathan.lex@mail.utoronto.ca
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being a University of Toronto medical student.
- Being a University of Toronto orthopaedic surgery resident.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous graduation from an orthopaedic surgery residency in Canada or abroad.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Immersive virtual reality (IVR) group
The experimental group will experience various surgical training modules using immersive virtual reality.
|
Using Oculus Quest 2 (Reality Labs, Meta Platforms, United States) headsets the PrecisionOS platform version 3.0 (PrecisionOS Technology, Canada) virtual reality surgical modules will be utilized.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Traditional hands on orthopaedic workshop group
Hands-on orthopaedic workshop sessions (including arthroscopy simulators, cadaveric models, and Sawbones®) in differing orthopaedic subspecialties (including sports, arthroplasty, and spine surgery).
|
Hands-on orthopaedic workshop sessions (including arthroscopy simulators, cadaveric models, and Sawbones®) in differing orthopaedic subspecialties (including sports, arthroplasty, and spine surgery).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the training sessions, over 30 minutes testing period
|
The primary outcome of the study is to assess trainee procedural performance using simulators or cadaveric models between the experimental (IVR) and control groups, measured by Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) score.
|
2 weeks after the training sessions, over 30 minutes testing period
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Global Ratings Scale (GRS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the training sessions, over 30 minutes testing period
|
GRS will be used as a secondary outcome measure to evaluate the performance of the surgical trainees who will be participating in the study.
The GRS scores will be recorded by expert evaluators who will observe the trainees performing the surgical procedure.
The scores will be analyzed to assess the effect of the intervention on the overall performance of the trainees.
|
2 weeks after the training sessions, over 30 minutes testing period
|
|
Hand and body motion analysis using sensors
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the training sessions, over 30 minutes testing period
|
Motion analysis is used to evaluate the effectiveness of the training intervention and can help identify areas for improvement in surgical technique.
By incorporating this objective measure, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of the training interventions on surgical performance.
|
2 weeks after the training sessions, over 30 minutes testing period
|
|
Experimental and confidence questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the training sessions, over 30 minutes testing period
|
Experimental and confidence questionnaire will be used to assess the participants' confidence level and perception of their own skills in performing the simulated laparoscopic task.
This questionnaire will include questions regarding their comfort level with the equipment, confidence in their ability to complete the task accurately and efficiently, and their overall perception of their own skill level.
The questionnaire will be administered after each simulation session and will be used to assess any changes in the participants' confidence and perception of their own abilities throughout the study.
The results of this questionnaire will provide valuable insight into the participants' perceived skill level, and may be used to inform future training programs or interventions aimed at improving surgical skills.
|
2 weeks after the training sessions, over 30 minutes testing period
|
|
Time to complete the procedure
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the training sessions, over 30 minutes testing period
|
This secondary outcome will measure the total time required to complete the procedure, from the start of the procedure to the end.
The time will be recorded in minutes using a stopwatch, and any breaks or interruptions during the procedure will be noted.
|
2 weeks after the training sessions, over 30 minutes testing period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jesse Wolfstadt, MD, University of Toronto
- Principal Investigator: Peter Ferguson, MD, University of Toronto
- Principal Investigator: Johnathan R Lex, MB ChB, University of Toronto
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 44020
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Virtual Reality
-
The Cleveland ClinicRecruitingEndoscopy | Virtual Reality | Ergonomics | Virtual Reality HeadsetUnited States
-
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS TrustNot yet recruitingVirtual Reality | Education, Medical | Virtual Reality Simulation
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedVirtual Reality | Pediatric Burn | Immersive Virtual Reality | Passive Virtual RealityEgypt
-
Stanford UniversityRecruitingVirtual Reality | Augmented RealityUnited States
-
National Taiwan University HospitalRecruiting
-
National Taiwan University HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Charles River AnalyticsNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS); The New England...Completed
-
Ardahan UniversityCompleted
-
The Methodist Hospital Research InstituteNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedVirtual RealityUnited States
Clinical Trials on Immersive virtual reality (IVR)
-
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and SimulationCompletedMedical Education | Virtual RealityDenmark
-
Hospital Mutua de TerrassaUniversity of BarcelonaRecruitingPregnancy Related | Anxiety DepressionSpain
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaCompletedStress | Performance | Nurse | Intensive Care (ICU) | Immersive Virtual RealityTurkey
-
St. Justine's HospitalNot yet recruitingPain | Anxiety | Hysteroscopy
-
I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa LuciaRecruitingStroke | Neglect, HemispatialItaly
-
Acibadem UniversityKartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City HospitalCompletedRheumatoid Arthritis | Chronic Pain | Virtual RealityTurkey
-
Duke UniversityNot yet recruitingStroke | Hemianopia | Quadrantanopia | Occipital Lobe Infarct | Visual Fields Hemianopsia | Visual Field Defect | Visual Field Defect Following Cerebrovascular AccidentUnited States
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityJohns Hopkins University; The University of Hong Kong; University of ReadingNot yet recruitingMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)Hong Kong
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRecruitingVirtual RealityCanada
-
European University Miguel de CervantesNot yet recruitingFrailty | Aging | Functional ImpairmentSpain