Resilience Mobile App for Teens and Young Adults With Cancer

July 16, 2025 updated by: Nancy, Seattle Children's Hospital

Pilot Trial Testing Mobile Health Psychosocial Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer

The goal of this pilot trial is to examine whether a mobile app version of the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) intervention is acceptable, easy to use, and helps improve quality of life and mental health symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) with cancer are at risk of distress, anxiety, depression, and poor quality of life. The use of mobile applications for psychosocial symptom self-management is appealing to this demographic population but this has not yet been developed and tested.

PRISM is a novel, brief, evidence-based 1:1 intervention that teaches stress management, goal-setting, meaning making, cognitive-behavioral, and mindfulness strategies. Here, we propose to test a mobile health (mHealth) version of PRISM, mPRISM. In a pilot randomized controlled trial, we will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and exploratory efficacy of mPRISM using a waitlist control design.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 12-25 years
  • Diagnosis of new malignancy within 12 months of enrollment treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy at Seattle Children's Hospital (SCH)
  • Patient able to speak/read/write English or Spanish language
  • Cognitively able to participate in mHealth psychosocial intervention and interactive interviews

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal to participate (any age), or parental refusal to participate for patients less than 18 years of age
  • Patients with diagnosis of malignancy >12 months
  • Patients with relapsed, recurrent, or refractory disease
  • Patient without chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy as part of cancer treatment (e.g., surgical resection only patients are not-eligible)
  • Cognitively or physically unable to participate in mHealth psychosocial intervention and surveys

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: mPRISM
The Experimental (mPRISM) arm will receive mPRISM upon completion of their baseline study surveys.
PRISM is a brief, 1:1, skills-based resilience intervention delivered in-person by trained layperson coaches. PRISM's development was based on iterative research within the AYA oncology population, stress and coping theory, resilience theory, and successful cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness interventions. mPRISM is a digital version of the PRISM program with no in-person delivery. mPRISM includes coping skills modules: managing stress, goal-setting, cognitive reframing, and meaning-making.
Other: Waitlist control
Usual Care (UC) available to both study arms consists of standard non-directed supportive care provided for all patients including an assigned social worker throughout cancer treatment. In a waitlist design, the UC arm will receive mPRISM upon completion of 3-month follow-up surveys.
PRISM is a brief, 1:1, skills-based resilience intervention delivered in-person by trained layperson coaches. PRISM's development was based on iterative research within the AYA oncology population, stress and coping theory, resilience theory, and successful cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness interventions. mPRISM is a digital version of the PRISM program with no in-person delivery. mPRISM includes coping skills modules: managing stress, goal-setting, cognitive reframing, and meaning-making.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of intervention
Time Frame: immediately post-intervention
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) is a well-validated 4-item scale that measures the perception among implementation stakeholders that a given treatment, service, practice, or innovation is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory. Scale ranges from 4 to 20; higher scores are better.
immediately post-intervention
Appropriateness of intervention
Time Frame: immediately post-intervention
The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) is a well-validated 4-item scale that measures the perceived fit, relevance, or compatibility of the innovation or evidence-based practice for a given practice setting, provider, or consumer, and/or perceived fit of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem. Scale ranges from 4 to 20; higher scores are better.
immediately post-intervention
Feasibility of intervention
Time Frame: immediately post-intervention
The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) is a well-validated 4-item scale that measures the extent to which a new treatment, or an innovation, can be successfully used or carried out within a given agency or setting. Scale ranges from 4 to 20; higher scores are better.
immediately post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usability of intervention
Time Frame: immediately post-intervention
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a well-validated and widely used 10-item scale to evaluate the perceived usability of digital interventions. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale for a total score ranging from 0-100, and scores ≥70 considered adequate usability.
immediately post-intervention
Change in health-related quality of life
Time Frame: immediately post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention
The PedsQL 4.0 Generic and 3.0 Cancer Module include 50 items evaluating health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of AYAs with cancer. Queries assess physical, emotional, social, and school well-being, plus cancer-related pain and hurt, nausea, procedural anxiety, treatment anxiety, worry, cognitive problems, perceived physical appearance, and communication. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better HRQOL.
immediately post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Change in resilience
Time Frame: immediately post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention
The CD-RISC is a well-validated and widely used 10-item instrument to measure inherent resiliency. Questions revolve around personal problem-solving and approaches to adversity. Scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating higher resilience.
immediately post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Change in distress
Time Frame: immediately post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention
This 6-item scale measures "level of psychological distress experienced in the past month." The instrument strongly discriminates between community cases and non-cases of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM)-V psychiatric disorders such as serious emotional distress or serious mental illness. Scores range from 0-24, with higher scores indicating higher distress.
immediately post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Change in anxiety and depression
Time Frame: immediately post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention
7 items assess symptoms of anxiety and depression, respectively, in patients with serious illness. It has been validated in AYAs with chronic illness and cancer survivors, with excellent reliability (α=0.83-0.82). Items are scored 0-3 (subscale range 0-21), with scores ≥8 categorized as borderline abnormal, and ≥11 categorized as abnormal.
immediately post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00004006

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on mPRISM

Subscribe