Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

October 6, 2023 updated by: Hacı Yusuf Güneş, MD, Yuzuncu Yıl University

Comparison of Erector Spina Plane Block and Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

The primary purpose of this study was to compare the effects of erector spinal plane block (ESP) and IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) performed to provide analgesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgeries on visual analog skala (VAS), additional analgesia need, patient satisfaction and mobilization times.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

ASA I-III patients aged 18-65 years who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy at Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Medicine were included in the study.

The patients were informed about the study during the preoperative evaluation. In the randomized single-blind closed-envelope study, 30 patients ineach group and a total of 60 patients were included. Standard general anesthesia procedure was applied to all patients. Standard general anesthesia procedure was applied to all patients. Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring was performed. In patients who underwent general anesthesia, after the surgical procedure was completed, after sterility was ensured for the ESP group while the patient was in the lateral position for the ESPB procedure, the linear 10-18 MHz USG probe (Esaote MyLab 30, Geneva, Italy) was placed between two transverse processes in the paramedian plane and increased from 1mg/kg to %1 at the T7 level. 20 ml of 0.5 bupivacaine (Buvasin®, Vem, Istanbul, Turkey) + 2% arrhythmic residual SF from 1mg/kg was administered. For patients in the PCA group, 200 mg of tramadol was placed in 100cc of 0.9% NaCl. Set to PCA device. A 50mg loading dose was administered 10 minutes before the patient was extubated. After extubating, a bolus dose of 20 mg was started, with a 30-minute lock-in time, and an infusion dose of 5mg/hour. The 4-hour maximum limit was set to 200 mg.

VAS score, need for additional analgesia, patient satisfaction (Likert scale), mobilization times and vital signs were recorded at 30 minutes, p1, 3, 6 and 12 hours after the operation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • VAN, Turkey, 65080
        • Haci Yusuf GUNES

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III,
  • Between 18-65 years old,
  • Percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery,
  • Patients who agreed to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Obesity (BMI≥ 35)
  • Coagulopathy
  • Active Infection
  • Drug allergies
  • Pregnancy
  • 65 years and older

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group ESP, Erector Spina Plane Block (n= 30)
After the surgical procedure was completed in patients who underwent general anesthesia, the necessary sterility was provided for the ESPB procedure while the patient was in the lateral position. 1mg/kg 0.5% bupivacaine + 1mg/kg 2% lidocaine was drawn into the same syringe and the volume was completed to 20 ml with normal saline. A linear 10-18 MHz USG probe was placed at the thoracic 7 level (Esaote MyLab 30, Geneva, Italy) in the paramedian plane between two transverse processes. The prepared local anesthetic drug was administered under the guidance of USG.
In patients who underwent general anesthesia, after the surgical procedure was completed, after sterility was ensured for the ESP group while the patient was in the lateral position for the ESPB procedure, the linear 10-18 MHz USG probe (Esaote MyLab 30, Geneva, Italy) was placed between two transverse processes in the paramedian plane and increased from 1mg/kg to %1 at the T7 level. 20 ml of 0.5 bupivacaine (Buvasin®, Vem, Istanbul, Turkey) + 2% arrhythmic residual SF from 1mg/kg was administered. For patients in the PCA group, 200 mg of tramadol was placed in 100cc of 0.9% NaCl. Set to PCA device. A 50mg loading dose was administered 10 minutes before the patient was extubated. After extubating, a bolus dose of 20 mg was started, with a 30-minute lock-in time, and an infusion dose of 5mg/hour. The 4-hour maximum limit was set to 200 mg.
Other Names:
  • PCA, Patient Controlled Analgesia
Experimental: Group PCA, Patient Controlled Analgesia (n= 30)
For patients in the PCA group, 200 mg of tramadol was placed in 100cc of 0.9% NaCl. Set to PCA device. A 50mg loading dose was administered 10 minutes before the patient was extubated. After extubating, a bolus dose of 20 mg was started, with a 30-minute lock-in time, and an infusion dose of 5mg/hour. The 4-hour maximum limit was set to 200 mg.
In patients who underwent general anesthesia, after the surgical procedure was completed, after sterility was ensured for the ESP group while the patient was in the lateral position for the ESPB procedure, the linear 10-18 MHz USG probe (Esaote MyLab 30, Geneva, Italy) was placed between two transverse processes in the paramedian plane and increased from 1mg/kg to %1 at the T7 level. 20 ml of 0.5 bupivacaine (Buvasin®, Vem, Istanbul, Turkey) + 2% arrhythmic residual SF from 1mg/kg was administered. For patients in the PCA group, 200 mg of tramadol was placed in 100cc of 0.9% NaCl. Set to PCA device. A 50mg loading dose was administered 10 minutes before the patient was extubated. After extubating, a bolus dose of 20 mg was started, with a 30-minute lock-in time, and an infusion dose of 5mg/hour. The 4-hour maximum limit was set to 200 mg.
Other Names:
  • PCA, Patient Controlled Analgesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post operative analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours
Visual Analog Scale score were recorded at the post operative 30 minutes, 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th hours after the operation. High VAS score was interpreted as severe pain in patients. When the VAS score was 4 and above, additional analgesic (15 mg/kg paracetamol) was given intravenously.
24 hours
Additional analgesic drug
Time Frame: 24 hours
When the VAS score was 4 and above, 15 mg/kg paracetamol was given intravenously. Additional analgesic drug (Paracetamol) was recorded in milligrams.
24 hours
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 hours

Patient satisfaction was recorded using a Likert scale at the 30th minute, 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th hours after the operation.

Patient satisfaction was scored between 1 and 5 using a Likert scale at the 30th minute, 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th hours postoperatively. 1 point not satisfied at all, 2 points dissatisfied, 3 points not sure, 4 points satisfied, 5 points very satisfied.

24 hours
First walking time after surgery
Time Frame: 24 hours
Mobilization status was checked and recorded at the 30th minute, 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th hours after the surgery. We accepted the extubation time as the postoperative 0th hour. We determined the time when the patients started walking for the first time after the surgery accordingly.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hacı Yusuf YG Güneş, Assist.prof, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Van, Turkey

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Study protocol and statistical analysis plan will be share for other resarchers.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 month

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The access can be provided via the e-mail addresses below hyusufgunes@hotmail.com

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nephrolithiasis

Clinical Trials on Bupivakain + deksametazon Adjuvant

Subscribe