Threshold Inspiratory Trainer Versus Trigger Sensitivity Adjustment on Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation

April 26, 2023 updated by: Heba Ahmed Ali Abdeen, Cairo University

Effect of Threshold Inspiratory Trainer Versus Trigger Sensitivity Adjustment on Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation

Ninety adult patients from both gender, with acute respiratory failure, intubated and mechanically ventilated. Their ages ranged from 50 to 70 years. They were selected from Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Department of Chest Diseases, Cairo University Hospitals. They have randomly assigned into three equal groups. Group (A): trained by threshold IMT device plus routine physical therapy. Group (B): trained by adjusting MV trigger sensitivity plus routine physical therapy. Group (C): only received routine physical therapy. (Negative inspiratory force NIF, arterial blood gases, P/F ration, respiratory rate RR, tidal volume VT, and rapid shallow breathing index RSBI) were measured before the study and at the end of the study (just before weaning for successfully weaned patients, or on the 10 day of intervention for failed weaning patients).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 12316
        • Faculty of Physical Therapy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Their age ranged from 50-70 years.
  • The patients were diagnosed with acute respiratory failure duo to COPD exacerbation and need mechanical ventilation support for more than 48 hours.
  • They were vitally stable and can tolerate pressure support
  • PEEP less than 8Cm H2O , SpO2 more than 90).
  • All patients were conscious and responded to verbal command.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable hemodynamics,
  • unstable neurological problems,
  • lack of attention and cooperation
  • skipping more than five training sessions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: IMT group
Training by inspiratory muscle device plus chest physiotherapy
The threshold inspiratory muscle trainer (IMT) device offers resistance to respiration through the spring-loaded valve.
Conventional chest physiotherapy
Active Comparator: TS group
Adjusting trigger sensitivity of the mechanical ventilator to the lowest pressure tolerated plus chest physiotherapy
Conventional chest physiotherapy
modifying the mechanical ventilator trigger sensitivity so that patients can only initiate inspiratory flow by producing more negative intrathoracic pressure
Sham Comparator: PT group
Routine chest physiotherapy
Conventional chest physiotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2)
Time Frame: change from baseline at one week
arterial blood sample was taken and examined thePao2
change from baseline at one week
partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PaCO2)
Time Frame: change from baseline at one week
arterial blood sample was taken and examined the PaCO2
change from baseline at one week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory rate (RR)
Time Frame: change from baseline at one week
Number of respiratory cycles per minute
change from baseline at one week
tidal volume (TV)
Time Frame: change from baseline at one week
volume of air inspired in quiet breathing
change from baseline at one week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 12, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

May 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ICU2022

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Threshold inspiratory muscle trainer device

Subscribe