A Psychosocial Dyadic Programme for Patients With Heart Failure and Their Family Caregivers

September 19, 2025 updated by: Can XIONG, The University of Hong Kong

The Effects of a Psychosocial Dyadic Intervention on the Mutuality, Psychological and Quality of Life Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure and Their Family Caregivers: A Mixed-methods Study

The overall aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of a psychosocial dyadic intervention on mutuality, psychological strengths (i.e., resilience and self-compassion), psychological distress (i.e., anxiety and depression), and QoL outcomes of HF patients and caregivers. The HF patient-caregiver dyads will be randomly allocated to the intervention group to receive a 12-week relationship-focused psychosocial dyadic intervention, or to the control group to receive the usual care provided by the clinical team in the hospital.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Heart failure (HF) is the terminal stage of various cardiovascular diseases. HF patient-caregiver dyads, who need to undertake the majority of HF care responsibility in the community, often experience a challenging adaptive process. There is a desperate need to develop and evaluate psychosocial dyadic interventions in HF patients and caregivers, as well as examine the working mechanism of such interventions. This sequential mixed-methods study consists of a single-blinded, two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) and a qualitative study. The dyads will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group to receive a 12-week relationship-focused psychosocial dyadic programme, or to the control group to receive the usual care provided by the clinical team in the hospital. Besides, an empowerment-based approach will be employed in this programme to work together with patients and caregivers to set goals and develop an action plan to facilitate goal attainment. For the patients, Mutuality Scale, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Self-Compassion Scale Short Form, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale will be administered at baseline, immediate and 3-month post-intervention. For the caregivers, the Mutuality Scale, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Self-Compassion Scale Short Form, Family Caregiver Quality of Life Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale will be administered at baseline, immediate and 3-month post-intervention. A pilot study will be conducted to determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effect of the intervention first. Afterwards, a full-scale mixed-methods study will be conducted to evaluate the effects of the intervention and the mechanism underlying the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

192

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430000
        • Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients and caregivers aged 18 years or older
  • patients diagnosed with heart failure
  • able to identify one family caregiver who provides unpaid daily caregiving≥3.5hr/ day to participate
  • patients and caregivers able to read simplified Chinese and communicate in Mandarin
  • have access to a telephone at home.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • psychiatric problems requiring active treatment
  • other terminal illnesses, such as advanced cancer
  • with mechanical circulatory support, on the heart transplant list or with a history of heart transplant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 12-week psychosocial dyadic intervention
The 12-week psychosocial dyadic intervention will comprise six weekly 60-min telephone-based sessions, followed by two weekly and two bi-weekly telephone follow-ups.
Comprising six weekly 60-min telephone-based sessions, followed by two weekly and two bi-weekly telephone follow-ups.
No Intervention: Usual care
Participants in the control group will receive the usual care provided by the clinical team in the hospital

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mutuality Scale
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline at the 3 months (after the intervention) and 6 months (follow-up)
The Mutuality Scale (MS, Chinese version) will be used to measure the relationship quality between HF patients and caregivers. The 15-item Mutuality Scale consists of four dimensions: love and affection, shared values, shared enjoyable activities, and reciprocity. The 5-point Likert-type scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (quite a lot) is used, with higher scores indicating better relationship quality.
Changes from Baseline at the 3 months (after the intervention) and 6 months (follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline at the 3 months (after the intervention) and 6 months (follow-up)
The 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC, Chinese version) will be adopted to measure resilience in patients and caregivers. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not true at all) to 4 (true nearly all the time). The scores range from 0 to 40, with higher values implying greater resilience.
Changes from Baseline at the 3 months (after the intervention) and 6 months (follow-up)
Self-Compassion Scale Short Form
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline at the 3 months (after the intervention) and 6 months (follow-up)
The 12-item Self-Compassion Scale Short Form (SCS-SF, Chinese version) will be used to measure self-compassion in patients and caregivers. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). The score ranges from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating a higher level of self-compassion.
Changes from Baseline at the 3 months (after the intervention) and 6 months (follow-up)
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline at the 3 months (after the intervention) and 6 months (follow-up)
The Chinese version of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) will be used to measure the disease-specific health-related QoL in HF patients. Patients respond to the 21 items using a 6-point Likert scale (0 = no; 5 = very much). The total score ranges from 0 to 105, with lower scores indicating better health-related QoL.
Changes from Baseline at the 3 months (after the intervention) and 6 months (follow-up)
Family Caregiver Quality of Life Scale
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline at the 3 months (after the intervention) and 6 months (follow-up)
The Chinese version of the Family Caregiver Quality of Life Scale (FAMQoL) will be adopted to measure the QoL in caregivers. The five-point Likert scale with replies ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" is used. The total scores range from 16 to 80, and higher scores indicate better QoL.
Changes from Baseline at the 3 months (after the intervention) and 6 months (follow-up)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline at the 3 months (after the intervention) and 6 months (follow-up)
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to evaluate the psychological distress of patients and caregivers. The 4-point Likert scale from 0 (not a problem) to 3 (high level of problems) is applied. The higher scores in the two sub-scales indicate a more intensive anxious and depressed mood.
Changes from Baseline at the 3 months (after the intervention) and 6 months (follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Can Xiong, PhD student, The University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UW 23-226

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on 12-week psychosocial dyadic intervention

Subscribe