UltrasouNd-guided Percutaneous Intercostal Nerve Cryoneurolysis for Analgesia Following Traumatic Rib Fracture (UNPIN)

September 5, 2025 updated by: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

UltrasouNd-guided Percutaneous Intercostal Nerve Cryoneurolysis for Analgesia Following Traumatic Rib Fracture, a Pilot Randomized Control Trial (UNPIN Trial)

Traumatic rib fractures (i.e., broken ribs caused by a physical injury) are common and very painful. They also often lead to serious complications, more time spent in hospital, and can even lead to death. Even after rib fractures have healed, they can lead to long-term pain and a lower quality of life.

A technology called cryoneurolysis, which acts to freeze nerves causing pain using a small tool which can turn very cold, is a promising new way to manage rib fracture pain. This study is a test with a small number of people to see if it is feasible to use this technology for patients with rib fractures. If this is successful, we will recruit more people for a larger study to see if cryoneurolysis, along with standard pain control techniques, is better at stopping pain, compared to just the normal techniques alone. Participants in our study will be asked to rate their pain, and record pain medications that they take for 3 months after their pain procedure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

More than 100,000 people a year suffer from traumatic rib fractures. Pain from rib fractures impairs the ability to inspire deeply and cough effectively, predisposing patients to severe, potentially life threatening complications and increased healthcare costs. For many patients, this pain can also persist long after the acute injury has healed, delaying recovery and reducing quality of life.

Current pain interventions, including multimodal analgesia and local anesthetic-based nerve blocks, are useful, but are limited by a short duration of effectiveness, and/or risk of complications. Cryoneurolysis (CN) is a new method to control pain which acts to freeze intercostal nerves (ICNs) associated with fractured ribs using a handheld device. This freezing action causes neurons to undergo Wallerian degeneration distally from the site of ablation and thus exhibit an extended but reversible block.

This study is a single-site, randomized, pilot study to assess the feasibility of recruitment, randomization, and protocol adherence of providing cryoneurolysis for patients with traumatic rib fractures. Secondary data from the pilot trial designed to assess the effectiveness of the intervention (pain scores, opioid usage, etc.) will be included in the analysis of the full trial if feasible. The objective of the full trial is to demonstrate that cryoneurolysis of ICN, in addition to standard analgesic practice, provides superior, prolonged analgesia.

Participants (individuals aged 18-85, with 3-8 unilateral traumatic rib fractures) will be randomized 1:1 in blocks of 4, stratified by number of rib fractures (> 4 or ≤4) and the presence/absence of flail segment, to receive the current standard of practice for rib fractures (multimodal analgesia and erector spinae plane (ESP) catheter infusion) with or without the addition of CN. Participants in the standard care group will receive a sham CN procedure to maintain blinding.

All participants (both groups) will receive standard of care analgesia. Specifically, an ultrasound-guided ESP catheter will be placed as per standard protocols. 20cc of 0.5% ropivacaine and 1% lidocaine will be injected through the catheter, followed by a basal infusion of 2 cc/hr of 0.2% ropivacaine (to maintain catheter patency) with an on demand patient controlled regional anesthesia (PCRA) dose of 10cc 0.2% ropivacaine available hourly until patient has met criteria for APS discharge or pain is controlled such that PCRA use is < 2 boluses over 12 hrs and NRS < 3 with deep breathing and coughing.

Standard multimodal analgesia including Tylenol 1000mg QID, Celebrex 200mg BID (or ketorolac 7.5 QID), Pregabalin 50mg BID, and/or PRN oral hydromorphone (1-4mg) will also be provided. Additional analgesics include intravenous ketamine at a dose of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg/hr of lean body weight in the event of consistent NRS pain scores > 6, and up to 0.05 mg/kg of intravenous midazolam for anxiolysis and 1mcg/kg of intravenous fentanyl for comfort during positioning, as required.

Participants will remain in the study for 3 months from the date of the block procedure. They will be followed daily while in hospital and using a pain diary following discharge (weekly pain scores and daily opioid usage). Additionally, follow-ups will be completed at 1h, 24h, 48h, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post block procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N3M5
        • Recruiting
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged ≥18
  • Unilateral traumatic rib fractures (3 to 8)
  • Candidate for ESP block catheter
  • Within 48hrs of admission to hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of patient consent; unlikely to comply with follow up
  • Unable to use Patient Controlled Regional Analgesia (Ventilated/sedated patients or Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury)
  • Chronic pain (opioid use > 30mg oral morphine equivalent per day)
  • Substance use disorder
  • CrCl < 50
  • BMI > 45
  • Significant distracting injuries (unreduced long bone fractures, unstable pelvic or spine fractures and patients requiring trauma laparotomy- also preclude positioning for block placement (lateral decubitus or sitting up))
  • Contraindications for ESP catheter placement (pre-existing medical/neurological/hematologic diseases, localized infection/trauma at site of intervention, allergy to amide local anesthetics)
  • Contraindications to CN (cryoglobulinemia, paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria, multiple myeloma and cold urticarial).
  • Unable to return to Trauma Recovery Clinic (in-person or virtual) at 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cryoneurolysis Group
In addition to all standard of care analgesia treatments, CN will be performed on the ICN of each broken rib using the Iovera CN device and Generation 2 Iovera tip under ultrasound guidance.
Cryoneurolysis will be performed on the intercostal nerve associated with each fractured rib using a handheld cryoneurolysis machine (Iovera). Cryoneurolysis will consist of two 103 second cycles (includes cooling, ice ball formation and warming time) per rib fracture level. Ultrasound guidance will be used to identify appropriate rib fracture levels and to target the device tip in real time. All participants will also receive standard multimodal analgesia and ESP catheter infusion.
Sham Comparator: Standard Care Group
Participants in the control group will receive all standard of care analgesia treatments as well as sham CN (i.e., application of device without skin puncture or activation of unit) to maintain participant blinding.
Participants in the control group will receive sham CN (i.e., application of device without skin puncture or activation of unit) to maintain participant blinding. All participants will also receive standard multimodal analgesia and ESP catheter infusion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants randomized over an 8 month period
Time Frame: Entire pilot study (approximately 8 months)
Goal of 3 participants per month for 8 months
Entire pilot study (approximately 8 months)
Number of participants able to adhere to the protocol
Time Frame: Entire pilot study (approximately 8 months + 3 month follow-up)
Goal of > 90%
Entire pilot study (approximately 8 months + 3 month follow-up)
Number of participants able to adhere to the follow-up
Time Frame: 3 month follow-up
Goal of > 90%
3 month follow-up
Rate of Adverse events
Time Frame: 3 month follow-up
Ensure no adverse events (short or long term) associated with CN
3 month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Severity during deep inspiration 24 hours post ESP catheter placement
Time Frame: 24 hours post placement of ESP catheter
Pain measured using Numeric Pain Rating Scale
24 hours post placement of ESP catheter
Time to discontinuation of ESP catheter
Time Frame: Until ESP catheter removal (usually < 7 days)
Based on when patient has met criteria for APS discharge or pain is controlled such that PCRA use is < 2 boluses over 12 hrs and NRS < 3 with deep breathing and coughing
Until ESP catheter removal (usually < 7 days)
ESP catheter use
Time Frame: Until ESP catheter removal (usually < 7 days)
Cumulative volume of local anesthetic solution used via ESP catheter patient controlled reginal analgesia
Until ESP catheter removal (usually < 7 days)
Opioid consumption in hospital and after discharge
Time Frame: Daily for 90 days after block placement
Determined from medical records (in-hospital) and via a daily pain diary (post-discharge). Calculated in Oral Morphine Equivalents.
Daily for 90 days after block placement
Pain Intensity at 1 and 3 months
Time Frame: 1 and 3 month follow-ups
As measured using Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0-10) , at rest and during deep inspiration
1 and 3 month follow-ups
Oxygen requirements
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, post intervention, then daily until discharge
Room air oxygen saturation (SpO2) and requirement for supplementary O2 to maintain SpO2 > 92%
Pre-intervention, post intervention, then daily until discharge
Pulmonary Function Testing
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, post intervention, then daily until discharge
FVC
Pre-intervention, post intervention, then daily until discharge
Pulmonary Function Testing
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, post intervention, then daily until discharge
FEV1
Pre-intervention, post intervention, then daily until discharge
Pulmonary Function Testing
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, post intervention, then daily until discharge
Peak Inspiratory flow
Pre-intervention, post intervention, then daily until discharge
Pulmonary Function Testing
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, post intervention, then daily until discharge
Peak Expiratory Flow
Pre-intervention, post intervention, then daily until discharge
Length of Stay in hospital
Time Frame: Date of admission to date discharge
Hospital discharge date
Date of admission to date discharge
Length of Stay on acute pain service (APS)
Time Frame: Date of admission to date of discharge from acute pain service
Criteria include on oral meds without continuous regional analgesia or intravenous opioids
Date of admission to date of discharge from acute pain service
Time to achieve discharge criteria for isolated chest injury
Time Frame: Date of admission until discharge criteria met
Criteria include on oral meds without continuous regional analgesia, chest tube out and chest well evacuated (e.g. no evidence of retained hemothorax), and no supplemental O2
Date of admission until discharge criteria met
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 48 post block procedure, and 1 week, 1 month and 3 month follow-ups
Patient satisfaction assessed using Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale
48 post block procedure, and 1 week, 1 month and 3 month follow-ups
Incidence of chronic rib fracture pain
Time Frame: 3 month follow-up
As assessed using Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaire
3 month follow-up
Adverse events
Time Frame: until 3 month follow-up
Adverse events to be recorded include: local anesthetic complications, catheter related complications (clotting, migration), procedural complications (pneumothorax, bleeding, infection), and neurological disturbances (dysesthesia, hyperalgesia, allodynia) in area of rib fracture
until 3 month follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 1h and 48h, post block placement, daily in hospital, weekly post discharge and at 1 week follow-up
As measured using NRS-11, at rest and during deep inspiration
1h and 48h, post block placement, daily in hospital, weekly post discharge and at 1 week follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ben Safa, MD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 23, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified participant-level data will be made available upon reasonable request to study PI following publication of full trial results.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

This is a pilot trial and full inferential analysis will not be conducted until completion of the full trial. As such, data will be available following publication of the primary results of the subsequent full trial.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data and supporting information will be made available following reasonable request directly to study PI.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Cryoneurolysis

Subscribe