Regenerative Endodontics in Mature Permanent Teeth

June 4, 2023 updated by: Salma fathy

Evaluation of the Effect of Photobiomodulation on Revascularization of Mature Non-vital Permanent Teeth Using Blood Clot as Scaffold

this study was designed to compare the clinical and radiographic success of REPs after using blood clot scaffold in non-vital mature permanent teeth with or without photobiomodultion therapy

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Minya, Egypt
        • Minia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients free from any systemic diseases or genetic disorders.
  • Children aged 9-13 years old of both sexes.
  • Traumatically or cariously exposed single rooted mature permanent teeth which may be asymptomatic or manifested with dull ache pain, or spontaneous unprovoked toothache.
  • Non-vital single rooted mature permanent teeth that indicated for endodontic treatment
  • Swelling close to involved tooth accompanied with or without fistula.
  • Negative response to cold & electrical pulp test.
  • Informed Consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unrestorable teeth, or that need post and core for the final restoration.
  • Immature permanent teeth.
  • Known allergy, sensitivity to ciprofloxacin, metronidazol.
  • Uncooperativeness of child and/or parents or caregiver's behavior.
  • Presence of calcific metamorphosis inside root canals.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: blood clot regeneration
the regenerative procedures were performed by over-instrumentation the apices and irritating the apical tissues to induce bleeding into the root canal, then orifices plugged with MTA over blood clot and restored with GI.
regenerative procedures performed in necrotic mature permanent teeth
Active Comparator: photo-biomodulation regeneration
photobiomodulation therapy was carried out using diode laser with wavelenght 810 nm and output power 300 mW on the apical root areas of buccal and lingual surfaces at 48 hours intervals for 2 weeks after completion of the regenerative procedures which were performed by over-instrumentation the apices and irritating the apical tissues to induce bleeding into the root canal, then orifices plugged with MTA over blood clot and restored with GI.
regenerative procedures performed in necrotic mature permanent teeth

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pulp sensibility
Time Frame: Every 3 months over a period of one year
clinical evaluation of pulp sensibility using electric pulp tester as a measurement tool
Every 3 months over a period of one year
Radiographic evaluation of periapical tissues
Time Frame: Every 3 months over a period of one year

Radiographic evaluation using standardized digital radiograph that stored in computer for assessment of periapical tissues status using scoring system:

  1. Score 0 - No radiological changes seen compared to preoperative radiograph
  2. Score 1 - Slight decrease in radiolucency seen in periapical region
  3. Score 2 - Complete reduction or resolution of radiolucency seen in periapical region.
Every 3 months over a period of one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: salma khattab, master, Minia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 364

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Regenerative Endodontics

Clinical Trials on dental regenerative endodontics

Subscribe