Effect of IN Hospital PCR Based Assessment of Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infections on LEngth of Stay (INHALE)

June 29, 2023 updated by: Alexander Zoufaly

Effect of IN Hospital PCR Based Assessment of Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infections on LEngth of Stay - INHALE Trial

Does the use of the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel plus in hospitalized patients with lower respiratory infections lead to a reduction in length of hospital stay (LOS) and customized antibiotic treatment (higher amount of specific vs empiric treatment, shorter treatment duration, less antibiotic treatment, lower incidence of side effects) compared to the standard of care?

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) like pneumonia, exacerbations of COPD or bronchitis are caused by several viral and/or bacterial pathogens. Even in huge epidemiological studies the causative pathogen can just be detected in approximately 50% of pneumonia cases. In clinical practice the pathogen is only known in few cases, e.g. Legionella via urine antigen test. It is impossible to distinguish the triggering bacteria by clinical parameters and even accurate differentiation between bacterial and viral infections is often not possible. The same problem exists for other LRTIs.

The lack of knowledge of the causative pathogen leads to several problems:

First, clinicians tend to observe patients after treatment initiation for a longer period than probably necessary, which may lead to an increased length of hospital stay. Secondly, the antibiotic treatment has to be broad enough to cover all possible pathogens empirically. This might lead to an overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics, an increased risk of side effects, the development of antibiotic resistance or even delayed treatment of the causative agent. Finally, antibiotics are prescribed erroneously for viral infections, which have been misinterpreted as bacterial infections by clinicians.

The BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel plus can help to solve these problems by identifying the causative pathogen in LRTIs within 1.5 hours. The decision of the treatment and its duration would be pathogen driven and no longer just empirically based on a lot of unknown factors.

The investigators would like to perform the following study with two groups: standard of care (control group) vs Pneumonia panel plus (intervention group). Both groups will receive the standard of care treatment but the intervention group will additionally have their sputum analyzed via the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel plus.

Additional information empiric vs specific treatment:

  • empiric therapy - every antimicrobial therapy prescribed without knowing the pathogen

    o Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid or Cefuroxime or Ceftriaxone/Cefotaxime or Piperacillin/Tazobactam or Levofloxacin

  • Specific therapy - pathogen driven, prescribed knowing the pathogen; narrowed spectrum of agent

    • Pneumococcus - Penicillin G
    • H. influenzae - Cefuroxime or Doxycycline
    • Moraxella - Cefuroxime or Doxycycline
    • MSSA - Cefazolin or Flucloxacillin
    • MRSA - Linezolid or Vancomycin
    • Pseudomonas - Ceftazidime
    • E. coli - Cefuroxime or third generation Cephalosporin or Ciprofloxacin
    • Klebsiella - Cefuroxime or third generation Cephalosporin or Ciprofloxacin
    • Proteus, Serratia - third generation Cephalosporin or Ciprofloxacin
    • Enterobacter cloacae - Ertapenem
    • Legionella - Levofloxacin or Azithromycin
    • Mycoplasma - Azithromycin or Doxycycline
    • In case of ESBLs - Ertapenem or Meropenem
    • In case of carbapenemases - Ceftazidime/Avibactam (OXA48, KPC) or Meropenem/Vaborbactam (KPC) or Aztreonam +/- Ceftazidime/Avibactam (MBL +- others)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

302

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Hospitalised patients on a general ward
  • Ability to give consent
  • Ability to produce sputum

AND (one of the following diagnosis)

  • acute exacerabation of COPD (defined as known COPD and worsening of symptoms like dyspnea +/- wheezing +/- increased sputum purulence and the need for additional treatment)
  • Pneumonia (diagnosed via chest X-ray)

OR

Lower respiratory infection (which does not belong to one of the two former diagnosis) with following symptoms:

At least one criterion Cough (more than usual if smoker) Dyspnea Increased sputum purulence

AND (at least one criterion) Respiratory rate ≥22/min Reduced oxygen saturation (<95%) (or worsening of oxygen saturation by 3% (e.g. in patients with COPD) Fever (temp >38°C) Rales/wheezing Chest pain upon breathing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other proven or suspected systemic diseases which require antibiotic treatment, like:

    • Intraabdominal infections (appendicitis, cholecystitis, diverticulitis, peritonitis)
    • C. difficile associated diarrhea (only if existing on admission otherwise it will be identified as a side effect)
    • Urinary tract infections like pyelonephritis, urosepsis, cystitis + fever (asymptomatic bacteriuria is NOT an exclusion criterion)
    • Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (erysipelas, abscess with systemic symptoms, diabetic foot infection, osteomyelitis)
    • Another single cause which can explain the respiratory symptoms better than an infection (acute heart failure, pulmonary embolism, hypertension induced lung edema)
  • Proven respiratory infection via another PCR based system (e.g. influenza or tuberculosis)
  • Inability to give consent
  • Inability to produce sputum
  • Moribund and palliative patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of Care

standard of care (SOC) group = control group:

  • Routine laboratory parameters (CBC, CRP, kidney and liver parameters, etc.) on the day of admission and when clinically necessary - decision is made by the physician in charge
  • Sputum microscopy for quality assessment (via Bartlett score)
  • Chest X-ray on the day of admission or the day after
  • 2 Sets of blood cultures (if temperature >38°)
  • Pneumococcus urine antigen test for every patient with proven or suspected pneumonia
  • Legionella urine antigen test for every patient with proven or suspected pneumonia and clinical suspicion for Legionella infection (travel history, air condition, elevated CK, hyponatremia, reduced kidney function)
  • Antibiotic treatment if deemed necessary by the treating physician
Experimental: Standard of Care + Respiratory Panel

Pneumonia panel plus group = intervention group

  • Sputum analysis via the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel plus
  • Routine laboratory parameters (CBC, CRP, kidney and liver parameters, etc.) on the day of admission and when clinically necessary - decision is made by the physician in charge
  • Sputum microscopy for quality assessment (via Bartlett score)
  • Chest X-ray on the day of admission or the day after
  • 2 Sets of blood cultures
  • Pneumococcus urine antigen test for every patient with proven or suspected pneumonia
  • Legionella urine antigen test for every patient with proven or suspected pneumonia and
  • Antibiotic treatment if deemed necessary by the treating physician
Multiplex PCR Respiratory Panel from Biomerieux used on Patients Sputum

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
length of stay (LOS) in days
Time Frame: From admission to discharge or death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 12 Months
How long is the lenght of stay in days (half-days)?
From admission to discharge or death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of antibiotic treatment needed represented as days of treatment (DOT)
Time Frame: From start of antibiotic treatment to discontinuation of any cause, assessed up to 12 Months
How long is the duration of antibiotic treatment in days?
From start of antibiotic treatment to discontinuation of any cause, assessed up to 12 Months
Number of usage of specific vs empiric antibiotic treatment
Time Frame: From start of antibiotic treatment to discontinuation of any cause, assessed up to 12 Months
Is there a difference in used antibiotic treatment?
From start of antibiotic treatment to discontinuation of any cause, assessed up to 12 Months
Cost of antibiotic treatment
Time Frame: From start of antibiotic treatment to discontinuation of any cause, assessed up to 12 Months
Is there a differnece in cost of antibiotic treatment?
From start of antibiotic treatment to discontinuation of any cause, assessed up to 12 Months
In hospital and 30-day mortality
Time Frame: From admission to death or 30 days after admission
Is there a difference in 30-day mortality?
From admission to death or 30 days after admission
C. difficile associated diarrhea within 30-day-follow-up
Time Frame: From admission to death or 30 days after admission
Is there a diference in incidence of C. difficile associated diarrhea?
From admission to death or 30 days after admission
30-day re-admission rate
Time Frame: From admission to death or 30 days after admission
Is there a difference in 30-day re-admission rate?
From admission to death or 30 days after admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alexander Zoufaly, Prof. Dr., Klinik Favoriten

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Infection

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Panel PCR Sputum

Subscribe