Respiratory Muscle Training in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury

June 12, 2023 updated by: University of Castilla-La Mancha

Respiratory Muscle Training to Improve Functional Capacity and Prevent Respiratory Complications in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of a programme based on inspiratory and expiratory muscle training to improve respiratory muscle strength, functional capacity and avoid pulmonary complications in adults with cervical or high dorsal spinal cord injury (C5-D5) in acute phase.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The design of the study is a randomised, triple-blind clinical trial with a control group.

The size of the sample will be 56 participants with cervical spinal cord injury and 56 with dorsal spinal cord injury. They will be randomized in two groups: experimental or control. The experimental group will perform combined inspiratory and expiratory muscle training as part of their rehabilitation programme during 6 weeks. The control group will continue their usual treatment.

Measurements will be taken at baseline, and post-intervention.

The statistical analysis will be an intention-to-treat analysis, and the data processing and analysis will be carried out with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 for Windows (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

112

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Toledo, Spain, 45071

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • People diagnosed with spinal cord injury.
  • Over 18 years of age.
  • Time of evolution less than 6 months and at least 4 weeks after the date of injury.
  • Level of lesion between C5 and D5 and degree of involvement A or B. In case of involvement A with partial preservation zone this should not include abdominal musculature according to the international standardised classification of the American Spinal Injury Association.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People with chest trauma.
  • Mechanically ventilated.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Any medical or psychiatric condition that could affect the ability to complete the study.
  • Carrying a tracheostomy tube that does not tolerate occlusion.
  • People who can not sit upright.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Respiratory muscle training
Respiratory muscle training with the Orygen-Dual Valve (Forumed S.L. ESP) and an initial load of 30% of their maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures.
The training of the intervention group will have an initial workload of 30% of maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures, which will be increased weekly by 10% according to tolerance, if not tolerated by 5%. In addition, patients will be instructed to maintain a normal respiratory rate (12-16 breaths per minute). Moreover, they will continue their usual treatment.
Sham Comparator: Control group
Simulated training with the Orygen-Dual Valve (Forumed S.L. ESP), without load.
In the control group, the respiratory muscle training will be simulated by using the device without load throughout the study period using an opaque adhesive tape surrounding the device to mask the valve position.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in maximal expiratory pressure
Time Frame: Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
The measurement of maximum static respiratory pressures will consist of performing maximum forced inspiration and expiration manoeuvres against an occluded airway in order to measure the pressure generated in the mouth, using a manometer or a pressure transducer, since, with the glottis open, the pressure in the mouth must be equal to the alveolar pressure.
Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
Change in maximal inspiratory pressure
Time Frame: Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
The measurement of maximum static respiratory pressures will consist of performing maximum forced inspiration and expiration manoeuvres against an occluded airway in order to measure the pressure generated in the mouth, using a manometer or a pressure transducer, since, with the glottis open, the pressure in the mouth must be equal to the alveolar pressure.
Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in forced vital capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
Using a spirometer, with the mouthpiece tightly sealed around the lips, the participant is asked, from the residual volume, to perform a rapid but unforced maximal inspiratory manoeuvre. With an apnoea of less than one second at total lung capacity, the participant is asked to exhale maximally, rapidly and forcibly, until the lungs are completely empty. At this point, the participant is strongly encouraged to start the manoeuvre abruptly and to prolong the exhalation long enough to reach RV.
Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
Change in coughing capacity
Time Frame: Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
Measurement of cough capacity will be performed by determining peak cough flow using a peak expiratory flow meter (Mini Wright flow meter; Clement Clarke International Ltd., Essex, UK).
Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
Change in elbow flexion strength
Time Frame: Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
In all subjects, the maximum load they can move in one repetition (1RM) in both limbs will be assessed for elbow flexion with Microfet4 dynamometer; Hoggan Health Industries, West Jordan, Utah.
Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
Change in shoulder flexion strength
Time Frame: Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
In all subjects, the maximum load they can move in one repetition (1RM) in both limbs will be assessed for shoulder flexion with Microfet4 dynamometer; Hoggan Health Industries, West Jordan, Utah.
Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
Change in number of people with respiratory complications
Time Frame: Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
Respiratory complications will be assessed by consulting the medical history.
Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
Change in health-related quality of life assessed by Short-Form 36 questionnaire.
Time Frame: Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
Health-related quality of life will be measured with the Short-Form 36 questionnaire, with values ranging from 0 to 100 (higher scores mean better health-related quality of life).
Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
Change in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1)
Time Frame: Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
Using a spirometer, with the mouthpiece tightly sealed around the lips, the participant is asked, from the residual volume, to perform a rapid but unforced maximal inspiratory manoeuvre. With an apnoea of less than one second at total lung capacity, the participant is asked to exhale maximally, rapidly and forcibly, until the lungs are completely empty. At this point, the participant is strongly encouraged to start the manoeuvre abruptly and to prolong the exhalation long enough to reach RV.
Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
Change in cardiorespiratory fitness
Time Frame: Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
Cardiorespiratory fitness will be measured using the 6-minute wheelchair propulsion test (adapted from Bass A et al. 2020). This is a validated test to measure cardiorespiratory fitness through a submaximal exercise test where the patient performs a 25-metre figure-eight run for 6 minutes and the distance covered in that time is recorded.
Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ana Torres-Costoso, University of Castilla-La Mancha

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Only the research team, and the health authorities, who have a duty of confidentiality, will have access to all data collected by the study. Information that cannot be identified may be passed on to third parties.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on Respiratory muscle training

Subscribe