Diuretic Use in Hemodialysis Patients With Residual Renal Function (DIURESED)

May 4, 2026 updated by: University of Alberta

Diuretic Use in Hemodialysis Patients With Residual Renal Function: a Proof of Concept Study

This pilot trial will evaluate the use of diuretic medications (furosemide and chlorthalidone) in participants on dialysis to see if these medications work to preserve existing kidney function, increase urine output, and reduce weight gain between dialysis treatments. Diuretics, which are sometimes called water pills, help the body to get rid of salt (sodium) and water. There are currently no guidelines for the use of diuretic medications in dialysis patients, including the type to use, or how much to use.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

Fluid overload, or extracellular fluid volume expansion, in patients on hemodialysis is an important predictor of mortality. It is associated with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy - both risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In the United States, 80% of patients receiving hemodialysis have hypertension and 40% of patients on hemodialysis die from cardiovascular disease. The pathophysiology of hypertension in these patients is multifactorial, however, combined excess fluid and sodium is a key contributor.

While ultrafiltration (removal of fluid through dialysis) is important in managing fluid overload, fluid removed by hemodialysis is a non-physiological process which imposes hemodynamic stress on the cardiovascular system in uremic patients. This system is already maladaptive as a result of decreased baroreceptor sensitivity and increased vascular stiffness, leading to higher risk of hemodynamic instability when fluid is removed from the intravascular compartment. In patients who are anuric, restriction of fluid and sodium intake and ultrafiltration are the only options for volume control. In patients who continue to produce urine, however, optimizing the amount of urine produced could improve fluid overload and decrease cardiovascular stress.

Previous studies have shown that patients on hemodialysis who have residual renal function have better volume and sodium control. Higher residual renal function and higher urine output lead to a lower interdialytic weight gain in patients receiving hemodialysis; each of these factors have been associated with lower mortality. One intervention that may increase or help maintain residual renal function and increase urine output and therefore reduce interdialytic weight gain is diuretic therapy, which promotes the excretion of sodium and water by the native kidneys. Questions remain regarding the dose-response of the drug furosemide, about the utility of adding the drug chlorthalidone, and their clinical affects.

The main objective of this study is to determine the effects of starting, and escalating doses of diuretic medications (furosemide +/- chlorthalidone) on 24-hour urine output (volume) over a five-week period in patients on hemodialysis who produce >200cc per day of urine.

Secondary objectives are:

  1. To evaluate the effect of diuretic medications on residual renal function
  2. To evaluate the effect of different doses of diuretics on interdialytic weight gain, ultrafiltration rates and intradialytic hypotension
  3. To examine the effect of diuretics on patient reported outcomes
  4. To evaluate adverse effects of different doses of diuretics
  5. To measure serum furosemide levels in this patient population

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7
        • University of Alberta

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (age 18 years or older), who are within their first 12 months of chronic (expected to need dialysis for at least 6 months), in-centre hemodialysis therapy, and
  • Residual renal function defined as 24-hour urine volume >200cc, and
  • Life expectancy of at least 6 months, and
  • Participants must be able to understand the consent process and be able to sign a consent form or have a substitute decision maker who is able to understand and sign consent on their behalf. In the case of non-English speaking participants, a translator service will be used to provide study information and obtain consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to complete baseline urine collection
  • Documented allergy or adverse reaction to furosemide or chlorthalidone.
  • Unable to take oral medications
  • Patients expecting to change modality (peritoneal dialysis, home dialysis) or to receive a renal transplant in the next 6 weeks
  • History of hypokalemia (<3.0 mmol/L), hypomagnesemia (<0.6mmol/L), or hypocalcaemia (<1.9mmol/L) in preceding 2 weeks.
  • Already participating in another study and one of the studies could interfere with the other study
  • Use of loop, or thiazide diuretic medications in the last week (if a patient is on chronic diuretics, they would need to be discontinued for 1 week before starting the trial)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Diuretic Therapy
Each participant will have a 2 week period of no diuretic use followed by 3 weeks of escalating doses: 1) initially furosemide twice daily, then (2) an increased dose of furosemide twice daily, and in the final week, (3) the addition of chlorthalidone once daily.
Each participant will have a 2 week period of no diuretic use followed by 3 weeks of escalating doses: 1) initially furosemide twice daily, then (2) an increased dose of furosemide twice daily, and in the final week, (3) the addition of chlorthalidone once daily.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in 24-hour urine output
Time Frame: Week 1
Change in urine output measured from 24-hour urine collection.
Week 1
Change in 24-hour urine output
Time Frame: Week 2
Change in urine output measured from 24-hour urine collection.
Week 2
Change in 24-hour urine output
Time Frame: Week 3
Change in urine output measured from 24-hour urine collection.
Week 3
Change in 24-hour urine output
Time Frame: Week 4
Change in urine output measured from 24-hour urine collection.
Week 4
Change in 24-hour urine output
Time Frame: Week 5
Change in urine output measured from 24-hour urine collection.
Week 5
Change in residual renal function
Time Frame: Week 1
Calculated based on weekly bloodwork (urea and creatinine levels) and 24-hour urine collection.
Week 1
Change in residual renal function
Time Frame: Week 2
Calculated based on weekly bloodwork (urea and creatinine levels) and 24-hour urine collection.
Week 2
Change in residual renal function
Time Frame: Week 3
Calculated based on weekly bloodwork (urea and creatinine levels) and 24-hour urine collection.
Week 3
Change in residual renal function
Time Frame: Week 4
Calculated based on weekly bloodwork (urea and creatinine levels) and 24-hour urine collection.
Week 4
Change in residual renal function
Time Frame: Week 5
Calculated based on weekly bloodwork (urea and creatinine levels) and 24-hour urine collection.
Week 5

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interdialytic weight gain
Time Frame: Week 1
Patient weight measured in kilograms
Week 1
Interdialytic weight gain
Time Frame: Week 2
Patient weight measured in kilograms
Week 2
Interdialytic weight gain
Time Frame: Week 3
Patient weight measured in kilograms
Week 3
Interdialytic weight gain
Time Frame: Week 4
Patient weight measured in kilograms
Week 4
Interdialytic weight gain
Time Frame: Week 5
Patient weight measured in kilograms
Week 5
Patient-reported outcomes - ESAS-r
Time Frame: Week 1
Patient reported outcomes using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) questionnaire.
Week 1
Patient-reported outcomes - ESAS-r
Time Frame: Week 2
Patient reported outcomes using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) questionnaire.
Week 2
Patient-reported outcomes - ESAS-r
Time Frame: Week 3
Patient reported outcomes using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) questionnaire.
Week 3
Patient-reported outcomes - ESAS-r
Time Frame: Week 4
Patient reported outcomes using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) questionnaire.
Week 4
Patient-reported outcomes - ESAS-r
Time Frame: Week 5
Patient reported outcomes using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) questionnaire.
Week 5
Patient-reported outcomes - Muscle cramps
Time Frame: Week 1
Patient reported outcomes using a muscle cramps question.
Week 1
Patient-reported outcomes - Muscle cramps
Time Frame: Week 2
Patient reported outcomes using a muscle cramps question.
Week 2
Patient-reported outcomes - Muscle cramps
Time Frame: Week 3
Patient reported outcomes using a muscle cramps question.
Week 3
Patient-reported outcomes - Muscle cramps
Time Frame: Week 4
Patient reported outcomes using a muscle cramps question.
Week 4
Patient-reported outcomes - Muscle cramps
Time Frame: Week 5
Patient reported outcomes using a muscle cramps question.
Week 5
Adverse effects
Time Frame: Week 1
Adverse effects based on symptoms and weekly bloodwork.
Week 1
Adverse effects
Time Frame: Week 2
Adverse effects based on symptoms and weekly bloodwork.
Week 2
Adverse effects
Time Frame: Week 3
Adverse effects based on symptoms and weekly bloodwork.
Week 3
Adverse effects
Time Frame: Week 4
Adverse effects based on symptoms and weekly bloodwork.
Week 4
Adverse effects
Time Frame: Week 5
Adverse effects based on symptoms and weekly bloodwork.
Week 5
Urine furosemide levels
Time Frame: Week 3
Urine furosemide levels from weekly urine samples
Week 3
Urine furosemide levels
Time Frame: Week 4
Urine furosemide levels from weekly urine samples
Week 4
Urine furosemide levels
Time Frame: Week 5
Urine furosemide levels from weekly urine samples
Week 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Branko Braam, MD/Ph.D., University of Alberta

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 29, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis

Clinical Trials on Furosemide

Subscribe