- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05925517
The Effect of Graded Motor Imagery on Pain and Function in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis
The Effect of Graded Motor Imagery on Pain and Function in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Artvin, Turkey, 08000
- Artvin State Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Minimum score of 24 on the Mini Mental State Examination (indicating no mild or severe dementia)
- Diagnosis of moderate unilateral knee osteoarthritis persisting for more than 12 months according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
- Experience of pain with a severity rating of 3 or higher on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for activities such as stair climbing, sitting, and squatting, lasting for at least 6 months (moderate to severe pain)
- Age between 45 and 64 years
- Residing in the city where the study is conducted
- Ability to walk independently
- Presence of limitations in knee range of motion (ROM)
- Symptomatic and radiographically confirmed OA diagnosis of Kellgren and Lawrence grade I-III
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are unwilling to participate in the study
- Patients presenting with secondary OA due to conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, gout, septic arthritis, tuberculosis, tumor, trauma, hemophilia, major medical or psychiatric disorders, recent fractures, presence of effusion or open reduction and internal fixation in the knee
- Presence of a neuromuscular disease
- History of intra-articular injections in the past 6 months
- Patients undergoing medication changes
- Presence of any chronic illness that would hinder participation in the treatment program
- Participation in a physiotherapy program for OA in the last 12 weeks
- Movement limitations or limb deficiency in the contralateral lower extremity
- Presence of visual or hearing problems that would affect treatment adherence.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Graded Motor Imagery
Each patient in the Graded Motor Imagery group will receive a treatment protocol consisting of Graded Motor Imagery, conventional physiotherapy, and home exercises.
|
GMI includes three stages. Each session will be 30 minutes, and the GMI program will span over 8 weeks. The first 3 weeks will focus on lateralization, followed by 3 weeks of motor imagery, and the final 2 weeks will involve mirror therapy. Lateralization: Patients will be asked to differentiate whether the extremities shown in the Recognise™ Knee application belong to the right or left side of their body. Motor Imagery: Patients will be instructed to imagine slowly and smoothly moving their affected extremities to the posture depicted in the photos in the Recognise™ Knee application and then returning to the starting position. Mirror Therapy: Using a mirror measuring 90x60 cm² placed between the lower extremities, patients will be instructed to progressively move only their unaffected extremity, then their affected extremity, and finally both extremities.
Other Names:
The routine 60-minute program for OA patients in conventional physiotherapy includes warming up, core stability, pelvic and hip stability, gluteus medius strengthening, knee control and stability (knee flexion and extension control, lunge exercises), knee strengthening exercises (wall-assisted leg press with a ball, step-ups with elastic bands), and functional exercises.
The home exercises will include a warm-up consisting of a 10-minute walk at a normal pace on a flat surface while gently stretching the hamstring and calf muscles.
The exercises will also involve straight leg raises, terminal knee extension, isometric contractions of the quadriceps femoris and adductor muscles using a pillow for support, toe raises, single-leg standing, toe taps, and quadriceps strengthening exercises included in the session.
|
|
Active Comparator: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
Each patient in the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation group will receive a treatment protocol consisting of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, conventional physiotherapy, and home exercises.
|
The routine 60-minute program for OA patients in conventional physiotherapy includes warming up, core stability, pelvic and hip stability, gluteus medius strengthening, knee control and stability (knee flexion and extension control, lunge exercises), knee strengthening exercises (wall-assisted leg press with a ball, step-ups with elastic bands), and functional exercises.
The home exercises will include a warm-up consisting of a 10-minute walk at a normal pace on a flat surface while gently stretching the hamstring and calf muscles.
The exercises will also involve straight leg raises, terminal knee extension, isometric contractions of the quadriceps femoris and adductor muscles using a pillow for support, toe raises, single-leg standing, toe taps, and quadriceps strengthening exercises included in the session.
Application will be performed using a TENS device and four separate 2 × 2 inch self-adhesive electrodes.
The current will be applied to the most painful area of the affected knee.
The four self-adhesive electrodes will be positioned in a square pattern, approximately 5 cm apart, centered over the pain point.
Conventional TENS will be applied for 30 minutes at a frequency of 100 Hz, pulse width of 100 μs, and intensity below 10% of the motor threshold.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) will be used to evaluate the severity of pain felt around the knee joint.
Participants will be asked to mark the severity of the pain they feel (rest, activity and night) on a 10 cm horizontal line, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain).
|
Baseline
|
|
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: After the 8-week intervention
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) will be used to evaluate the severity of pain felt around the knee joint.
Participants will be asked to mark the severity of the pain they feel (rest, activity and night) on a 10 cm horizontal line, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain).
|
After the 8-week intervention
|
|
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 6-week follow-up
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) will be used to evaluate the severity of pain felt around the knee joint.
Participants will be asked to mark the severity of the pain they feel (rest, activity and night) on a 10 cm horizontal line, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain).
|
6-week follow-up
|
|
Pain Pressure Threshold
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The pain pressure threshold will be measured using a algometer.
The pain pressure threshold will be evaluated at two points while the patient is lying in a lateral position: 1. point located 2 cm below the medial edge of the patella, and 2. point located 2 cm below the lateral edge of the patella.
The evaluator will position the algometer perpendicular to each point and apply gradual pressure at a constant rate of approximately 0.5 kg/cm2/s.
The pressure will be increased until the participant reports feeling pain.
Each point considered for analysis will be assessed three times, and the average value will be recorded.
|
Baseline
|
|
Pain Pressure Threshold
Time Frame: After the 8-week intervention
|
The pain pressure threshold will be measured using a algometer.
The pain pressure threshold will be evaluated at two points while the patient is lying in a lateral position: 1. point located 2 cm below the medial edge of the patella, and 2. point located 2 cm below the lateral edge of the patella.
The evaluator will position the algometer perpendicular to each point and apply gradual pressure at a constant rate of approximately 0.5 kg/cm2/s.
The pressure will be increased until the participant reports feeling pain.
Each point considered for analysis will be assessed three times, and the average value will be recorded.
|
After the 8-week intervention
|
|
Pain Pressure Threshold
Time Frame: 6-week follow-up
|
The pain pressure threshold will be measured using a algometer.
The pain pressure threshold will be evaluated at two points while the patient is lying in a lateral position: 1. point located 2 cm below the medial edge of the patella, and 2. point located 2 cm below the lateral edge of the patella.
The evaluator will position the algometer perpendicular to each point and apply gradual pressure at a constant rate of approximately 0.5 kg/cm2/s.
The pressure will be increased until the participant reports feeling pain.
Each point considered for analysis will be assessed three times, and the average value will be recorded.
|
6-week follow-up
|
|
WOMAC Pain Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The subscale can take a score between 0-20 and evaluates pain during walking on flat ground, going up and down stairs, standing, sitting and lying down.
|
Baseline
|
|
WOMAC Pain Subscale
Time Frame: After the 8-week intervention
|
The subscale can take a score between 0-20 and evaluates pain during walking on flat ground, going up and down stairs, standing, sitting and lying down.
|
After the 8-week intervention
|
|
WOMAC Pain Subscale
Time Frame: 6-week follow-up
|
The subscale can take a score between 0-20 and evaluates pain during walking on flat ground, going up and down stairs, standing, sitting and lying down.
|
6-week follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The WOMAC index will be used to evaluate pain, stiffness, and function.
It contains 24 items scored from 0 to 4: 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=extreme.
|
Baseline
|
|
Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: After the 8-week intervention
|
The WOMAC index will be used to evaluate pain, stiffness, and function.
It contains 24 items scored from 0 to 4: 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=extreme.
|
After the 8-week intervention
|
|
Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 6-week follow-up
|
The WOMAC index will be used to evaluate pain, stiffness, and function.
It contains 24 items scored from 0 to 4: 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=extreme.
|
6-week follow-up
|
|
Range of Motion (ROM)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Knee ROM will be evaluated with a digital goniometer while the participants lie comfortably in the prone position while active knee joint motion will be evaluated.
Evaluation will be performed with the pivot point following the lateral condyle of the femur, the fixed arm following the lateral midline of the femur, and the mobile arm following the fibula.
The measurements will be repeated three times for the affected and unaffected side, and the best value between the measurements will be recorded.
|
Baseline
|
|
Range of Motion (ROM)
Time Frame: After the 8-week intervention
|
Knee ROM will be evaluated with a digital goniometer while the participants lie comfortably in the prone position while active knee joint motion will be evaluated.
Evaluation will be performed with the pivot point following the lateral condyle of the femur, the fixed arm following the lateral midline of the femur, and the mobile arm following the fibula.
The measurements will be repeated three times for the affected and unaffected side, and the best value between the measurements will be recorded.
|
After the 8-week intervention
|
|
Range of Motion (ROM)
Time Frame: 6-week follow-up
|
Knee ROM will be evaluated with a digital goniometer while the participants lie comfortably in the prone position while active knee joint motion will be evaluated.
Evaluation will be performed with the pivot point following the lateral condyle of the femur, the fixed arm following the lateral midline of the femur, and the mobile arm following the fibula.
The measurements will be repeated three times for the affected and unaffected side, and the best value between the measurements will be recorded.
|
6-week follow-up
|
|
Isometric Muscle Strength
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Flexion and extension isometric muscle strength of the knee will be assessed using a hand-held dynamometer.
During the assessment, maximum voluntary contraction will be requested.
Measurements will be repeated three times (5 seconds of contraction followed by 30 seconds of rest) for both affected and unaffected knees, and the average value will be recorded in Newtons (N).
Patients will sit with their backs straight, arms crossed, hips flexed at 90°, and knees flexed at 30°, with their feet hanging off the side of the bed.
The dynamometer will be placed on the anterior surface of the tibia, two fingers above the lateral malleolus.
|
Baseline
|
|
Isometric Muscle Strength
Time Frame: After the 8-week intervention
|
Flexion and extension isometric muscle strength of the knee will be assessed using a hand-held dynamometer.
During the assessment, maximum voluntary contraction will be requested.
Measurements will be repeated three times (5 seconds of contraction followed by 30 seconds of rest) for both affected and unaffected knees, and the average value will be recorded in Newtons (N).
Patients will sit with their backs straight, arms crossed, hips flexed at 90°, and knees flexed at 30°, with their feet hanging off the side of the bed.
The dynamometer will be placed on the anterior surface of the tibia, two fingers above the lateral malleolus.
|
After the 8-week intervention
|
|
Isometric Muscle Strength
Time Frame: 6-week follow-up
|
Flexion and extension isometric muscle strength of the knee will be assessed using a hand-held dynamometer.
During the assessment, maximum voluntary contraction will be requested.
Measurements will be repeated three times (5 seconds of contraction followed by 30 seconds of rest) for both affected and unaffected knees, and the average value will be recorded in Newtons (N).
Patients will sit with their backs straight, arms crossed, hips flexed at 90°, and knees flexed at 30°, with their feet hanging off the side of the bed.
The dynamometer will be placed on the anterior surface of the tibia, two fingers above the lateral malleolus.
|
6-week follow-up
|
|
Mini Mental State Examination
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) will be used to assess the cognitive status of patients.
It consists of 11 questions and is evaluated on a scale of 30 points.
A score between 24-30 is considered normal, 18-23 indicates mild cognitive impairment, and a score of 17 or below is indicative of severe dementia.
The MMSE assesses orientation, memory, attention, calculation, recall, language, motor function, perception, and visuospatial abilities.
|
Baseline
|
|
Mini Mental State Examination
Time Frame: After the 8-week intervention
|
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) will be used to assess the cognitive status of patients.
It consists of 11 questions and is evaluated on a scale of 30 points.
A score between 24-30 is considered normal, 18-23 indicates mild cognitive impairment, and a score of 17 or below is indicative of severe dementia.
The MMSE assesses orientation, memory, attention, calculation, recall, language, motor function, perception, and visuospatial abilities.
|
After the 8-week intervention
|
|
Mini Mental State Examination
Time Frame: 6-week follow-up
|
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) will be used to assess the cognitive status of patients.
It consists of 11 questions and is evaluated on a scale of 30 points.
A score between 24-30 is considered normal, 18-23 indicates mild cognitive impairment, and a score of 17 or below is indicative of severe dementia.
The MMSE assesses orientation, memory, attention, calculation, recall, language, motor function, perception, and visuospatial abilities.
|
6-week follow-up
|
|
Timed Get Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The test will be initiated with each participant sitting on a chair with their back supported, arms resting on their lap, and both feet flat on the floor.
Participants will be timed using a stopwatch as they rise from the chair (45 cm in height), walk 3 meters as quickly and safely as possible, turn around, return to the chair, and sit down.
The time taken for each participant to complete these tasks will be recorded using a stopwatch.
|
Baseline
|
|
Timed Get Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: After the 8-week intervention
|
The test will be initiated with each participant sitting on a chair with their back supported, arms resting on their lap, and both feet flat on the floor.
Participants will be timed using a stopwatch as they rise from the chair (45 cm in height), walk 3 meters as quickly and safely as possible, turn around, return to the chair, and sit down.
The time taken for each participant to complete these tasks will be recorded using a stopwatch.
|
After the 8-week intervention
|
|
Timed Get Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: 6-week follow-up
|
The test will be initiated with each participant sitting on a chair with their back supported, arms resting on their lap, and both feet flat on the floor.
Participants will be timed using a stopwatch as they rise from the chair (45 cm in height), walk 3 meters as quickly and safely as possible, turn around, return to the chair, and sit down.
The time taken for each participant to complete these tasks will be recorded using a stopwatch.
|
6-week follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Zeynep Yıldız Kızkın, PhD, Artvin Çoruh University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Graded Motor Imagery
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Edin MešanovićCompletedOsteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis of the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee | Osteoarthritis of the Knees | Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee | Osteoarthritis Knee | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee JointBosnia and Herzegovina
-
Golden Jubilee National HospitalJohnson & Johnson; DePuy OrthopaedicsNot yet recruitingOsteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis (OA) | Osteo Arthritis | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis (Knee) | Osteo Arthritis of the KneeUnited Kingdom
-
Dr. David WassersteinSunnybrook Research InstituteRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA) | Knee Osteoarthritis (OA)Canada
-
LifeBridge HealthMicroPort Orthopedics Inc.; Rubin Institute for Advanced OrthopedicsRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis, Knee | Knee Pain Chronic | Arthropathy of Knee Joint | Knee Disease | Osteoarthritis Knees Both | Osteoarthritis Knee Left | Osteoarthritis Knee RightUnited States
-
Lucas R. Cusumano, MDNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Discomfort | Knee Pain Chronic | Knee Swelling PainUnited States
-
Emory UniversityVertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee ArthritisUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)United States
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityChinese University of Hong Kong; Zhujiang HospitalNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
-
University of MiamiNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Graded Motor Imagery (GMI)
-
Dr. Mehak NaeemUniversity of Health Sciences LahoreRecruiting
-
St. Ambrose UniversityCompleted
-
Superior UniversityActive, not recruitingEffectiveness of DT vs GMIT on Wrist Pain and Function in Patients With Reflex Sympathetic DystrophySympathetic; DystrophyPakistan
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyUnknown
-
Istanbul Aydın UniversityIstanbul University; The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationRehabilitation | Physical Therapy | Motor Imagery Training | Distal Radial Fracture | Mulligan MobilizationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Marmara UniversityCompletedPain | Shoulder Impingement SyndromeTurkey
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaRecruitingHealthy Controls | Ankle InstabilityTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of ValenciaCompletedGenito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration DisorderSpain
-
Acibadem UniversityNot yet recruiting