Graded Motor Imagery for Patients Within a Year After Stroke. (GMI)

April 1, 2016 updated by: Andrea Polli, IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy

The Effect of a Graded Motor Imagery Approach for Stroke Patients Within a Year After Stroke

The aim of the study is to evaluate whether a graded rehabilitation approach including Implicit and explicit motor imagery training and mirror therapy is more effective than other treatments commonly provided in a neuro-rehabilitation department.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Graded Motor Imagery is a graded approach recently proposed for treating chronic pain patients. It included three subsequent steps:

  1. Implicit Motor Imagery training (IMI), using a body part laterality discrimination task
  2. Explicit Motor Imagery training, using pictures and videos for improving patient's ability in imagining movements
  3. Mirror box therapy, using a 35x40 cm mirror,

We are transferring this approach into stroke rehabilitation in order to improve patients' upper limb motor functions.

All the patients, in both groups, will be training 2 hours a day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks. The first hour is standard treatment, the clinician in charge will decide treatment's priorities and the aim(s) of the treatment for each specific patient. The second hour will be focused on patient's upper limb function.

The treatment group will be treated accordingly to the GMI protocol. The control group will receive a second hour of standard treatment, centred on the upper limb. Standard treatments are decided by the interdisciplinary team and might include motor rehabilitation, bilateral arm training, virtual reality training or occupational therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Venice, Italy, 30126
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Ospedale San Camillo
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Andrea Polli, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Michela Agostini, BSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Alfonc Baba, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrea Turolla, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Marianna Cavinato, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within a year from the event;
  2. age of participant between 21 and 85 years old;
  3. absence of apraxia or global aphasia;
  4. Mini-Mental State Examination score >23.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of other neurological or orthopaedic disorders affecting upper extremity motor function,
  2. Neglect,
  3. Significant spasticity defined as a score ≥ 24 total points at Tardieu Rating Scale (TRS)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Graded Motor Imagery

GMI program includes three steps: Implicit Motor Imagery (IMI); Explicit Motor Imagery (EMI) and Mirror Box Therapy (MT).

IMI included a training based on Hand Laterality Discrimination Tasks. During these tasks 60 pictures of right and left hands are projected randomly on a 15" screen. Patients are asked to choose whether the images seen are right or left and therefore to click respectively the right or the left button on a mouse.

EMI training consists in imagining a movement without actual performing it. It will be introduced during IMI's last two sessions and gradually enhanced increasing the complexity of motor skills to be imagined. The therapist shows or explains in details the movements the patient have to mentally rehearsed.

MT treatments will start with simply watching the unaffected hand in the mirror and increased toward functional movement. When possible, gentle movement with the affected hand will be encouraged behind the reflecting part of the mirror.

Other Names:
  • GMI
Active Comparator: Standard treatment
Patients will undergo to a standard treatment, that is thought to be the best option for that specific patients. In our hospital, treatment options include: motor training, functional training, occupational therapy, bilateral arm training or motor treatment using virtual reality devices.
Other Names:
  • motor training
  • neurorehabilitation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Wolf's Motor Function Test (WMFT)
Time Frame: before and after the 4-weeks treatment
It includes 17 different tasks, which assess shoulder, elbow, wrist function and manual ability. For each task, a qualitative mark is given and time needed to complete the action is recorded.
before and after the 4-weeks treatment
Change in Fugl Meyer Assessment Scale for upper extremity (FMA)
Time Frame: Before and after the 4-weeks treatment
We use the Upper Extremity session of the scale. The scale evaluates patient's balance, passive and active movements of shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. It also evaluates different types of grips. Sense of position and ability to detect light touches are also evaluated.
Before and after the 4-weeks treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: before and after the 4-weeks treatment
FIM is an 18-item scale developed to assess severity of patient disability and medical rehabilitation functional outcome
before and after the 4-weeks treatment
Change in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Time Frame: before and after the 4-weeks treatment
In order to assess a possible neurophysiological effect of our treatment, we also evaluate cortical excitability using Single Stimulus TMS.
before and after the 4-weeks treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Andrea Turolla, MSc, IRCCS Ospedale San Camillo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 4, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Graded Motor Imagery

Subscribe