Advanced Cooking Education Pilot Study

June 22, 2023 updated by: Cornell University

Advanced Cooking Education (ACE) 4-H After School Club Pilot Study

The aim of this study is to assess the impact of an in-person multi-component Advanced Cooking Education (ACE) 4-H after school program. The ACE Program consists of mindfulness, nutrition education, cooking labs, and professional development activities.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The ACE program is conducted with 7th and 8th grade students attending New York City (NYC) Title I middle schools. Participants attend weekly sessions (2hour) after school to participate in mindfulness, nutrition lessons, and professional development activities. On another day in the week, students participate in cooking labs at their own time at their homes. The investigators hypothesize that after the program, adolescents' diet quality, cooking-related skills, stress levels will be improved compared to prior of the program.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Ithaca, New York, United States, 14853
        • Cornell University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 7th and 8th grade students attending Title I funded schools in New York City
  • Caregivers of the 7th and 8th grade students attending Title I funded schools in New York City

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not speak/understand English
  • Those who have previously participated in the Virtual ACE program (Feasibility Study)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control phase
After the first data collection session, participants spend 12 weeks and enter a "control phase" where they receive no intervention. At the end of the 12 weeks, participants will attend another data collection session.
Experimental: ACE intervention
The ACE Program is a culturally inclusive, 4-H after school club where youth meet once a week for 12 weeks after school in person. They also receive groceries to make a meal 1 day a week.
Participants attend the ACE Program for 12 weeks after school. On one assigned day of the week, participants attend ACE in person after school. The session begins with mindfulness exercises (15 minutes), professional development session (50 minutes), nutrition education lesson (20 minutes), and reflection period to talk about their experience in cooking lessons (25 minutes). On any day during the week, the students will make a dish using groceries they received (1 hour).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in change in diet quality between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Healthy Index Eating scores are calculated from three 24-hour diet records, range from 0-100. Higher score reflects higher alignment between one's diet and recommendations from Dietary Guidelines for Americans
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in change in body mass index between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Height will be measured using stadiometer to nearest decimal point in cm. Weight is measured using scale to nearest decimal in kg. Body mass index calculated using kg/m^2.
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Difference in change in body fat percentage between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Measured using a scale to nearest decimal
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Difference in change in waist circumference between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Measured using a waist circumference tape to the nearest decimal in cm
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Difference in change in dermal carotenoids level between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Measured using the Veggie Meter device, range from 0-800. Higher score acts as proxy for increased fruits and vegetables consumption
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Difference in change in household food security between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Short form food security survey module by the USDA
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Difference in change in child food security between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Child version of food security survey module by the USDA
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Difference in change in culinary skills between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
iCook program youth culinary skill survey with 5-point likert scale questions with higher scores indicate higher skill level (better outcome). Min=7, Max=35
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Difference in change in culinary self-efficacy between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
iCook program youth culinary self-efficacy survey with 5-point likert scale questions with higher scores indicate higher skill level (better outcome). Min=6, Max=30
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Difference in change in culinary attitudes between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Cooking with kids survey with 5-point likert scale questions with higher scores indicate more positive attitude (better outcome). Min=6, Max=30
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Difference in change in perceived stress between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Used the Cohen perceived stress scale. Higher scores mean increased stress (worse outcome). Min=0, Max=40
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Difference in change in food neophobia between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
FNTT10 survey with 5-point likert scale questions, higher scores mean less neophobia (better outcome). Min=10, Max=50.
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Difference in change in sense of purpose between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Used the Clarement Purpose Scale survey questions, higher scores mean higher sense of purpose (better outcome). Min=12, Max=60
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Difference in change in social and emotional competency between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Used the SEC survey by CASEL, higher scores mean higher competence (better outcome). Min=17, Max= 68
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Difference in change in family mealtime beliefs between intervention phase (12-24wk) and control phase (0wk-12wk)
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
Calculated based on the Fulkerson family mealtime survey. A total of 9 questions that are scored independently. Each: Min=1, Max=4. Higher scores indicate better family mealtime practices (better outcome).
0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tashara M Leak, PhD RD, Cornell University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 28, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0145840

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adolescent Behavior

Clinical Trials on ACE intervention

3
Subscribe