Evaluation of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) as a Risk Factor of Mortality in Adult Patients ≤65 Years of Age Admitted to Intensive Care for Septic Shock. (Woodstock)

May 5, 2026 updated by: Centre Hospitalier de Lens

The aim of the study is to demonstrate that "frail" patients, defined as having a CFS score greater than or equal to 5, and "severely" frail patients, defined as having a CFS score between [6-7] as defined by Bagshaw et al (14), constitute an independent risk factor (RF) for mortality.

In the same way, as an exploratory study, we will try to find out whether clinical frailty constitutes a risk factor for extending the length of hospital stay, the risk of short/medium-term readmission, as has already been demonstrated for patients admitted to intensive care from all causes (15), or for impaired quality of life.

The objective is to have a better understanding of the implications and outcomes associated with pre-hospital frailty in young critically ill patients.

This analysis will also help to clarify prognoses and contribute to better decision-making on the intensity and proportionality of care, as well as providing better information and helping to manage the expectations of patients and their families in terms of survival prognosis and subsequent quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Recent studies show the impact of frailty in a middle-aged or even young population of patients admitted to critical care in terms of mortality (13), and the persistent risk of impairment of physical and mental capacities after resuscitation (14). To date, few studies have looked at clinical frailty as a risk factor for mortality in a middle-aged or young population, more specifically those suffering from septic shock, which is already known to be a major factor in morbidity and mortality (15,16), with repercussions on long-term quality of life.

The aim of the study is to demonstrate that "frail" patients, defined as having a CFS score greater than or equal to 5, and "severely" frail patients, defined as having a CFS score between [6-7] as defined by Bagshaw et al (14), constitute an independent risk factor (RF) for mortality.

In the same way, as an exploratory study, we will try to find out whether clinical frailty constitutes a risk factor for extending the length of hospital stay, the risk of short/medium-term readmission, as has already been demonstrated for patients admitted to intensive care from all causes (15), or for impaired quality of life.

The objective is to have a better understanding of the implications and outcomes associated with pre-hospital frailty in young critically ill patients.

This analysis will also help to clarify prognoses and contribute to better decision-making on the intensity and proportionality of care, as well as providing better information and helping to manage the expectations of patients and their families in terms of survival prognosis and subsequent quality of life.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Boulogne-sur-Mer, France, 62321
        • Recruiting
        • CH Boulogne sur Mer
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Charles DETOLLENAERE, Dr
      • Béthune, France, 62408
        • Recruiting
        • Ch Germon Et Gauthier
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ghada SBOUI, Dr
      • Dijon, France, 21079
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Dijon
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jean-Pierre QUENOT, Pr
      • Lens, France
        • Recruiting
        • CH de Lens
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Guillaume DEGOUY, Doctor
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Lille
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alexandre GAUDET, Dr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients admitted to intensive care will be studied for this study. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria and with no non-inclusion criteria will be included in the study after obtaining the patient's or relative's, if applicable, non-objection.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged ≥18 years and ≤ 65 years
  • Patient admitted to intensive care - resuscitation
  • Patient admitted for suspected or documented type 3 sepsis
  • Presence of vasopressor amines to maintain MAP > 65mmHg despite filling
  • Lactatemia ≥ 2 mmol/L on admission.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient moribund on admission
  • Patients with severe pre-existing dementia and/or cognitive decline, suffering from severe neurodegenerative diseases that prevent the patient from living independently at baseline, including mental illness requiring institutionalisation, including acquired or congenital mental retardation, etc.
  • Pregnant women or women in labour
  • Patients under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patients deprived of their liberty
  • Patient and/or family unable to speak or understand French.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To show that the frailty score on admission is a risk factor for mortality at D28, independent of known risk factors, in young patients admitted to intensive care (ICU) for sepsis or septic shock.
Time Frame: 28 days after inclusion
The odds ratio of frail patients to non-frail patients for the risk of all-cause death at D28
28 days after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To study the association, independently of known risk factors, between the frailty score on admission and mortality at day 90.
Time Frame: 90 days after inclusion
Time from admission to death or last news, censored at D90
90 days after inclusion
To study the association, independently of known risk factors, between the frailty score on admission and length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 90 days after inclusion
The time between admission to IS and live discharge from hospital, death is considered a concurrent risk, the data are censored at 90 days
90 days after inclusion
To study the association, independently of known risk factors, between the frailty score on admission and the number of days with recourse to invasive therapies
Time Frame: 90 days after inclusion
Number of days with mechanical ventilation, with amines, with recourse to extra-renal purification (EER) during the IS stay.
90 days after inclusion
To study the association, independently of known risk factors, between the frailty score on admission and readmission to critical care or hospitalisation before D90, among patients discharged alive from ICU before D90.
Time Frame: 90 days after inclusion
Readmission to critical care or hospitalisation before D90, among patients discharged alive from ICU before D90.
90 days after inclusion
To study the association, independently of known risk factors, between the frailty score on admission and describe changes in frailty between ICU admission and D90 in patients alive at D90.
Time Frame: 90 days after inclusion
Change in frailty score defined by the CFS (continuous) between admission and D90 (in hospital or at home).
90 days after inclusion
To study the association, independently of known risk factors, between the frailty score on admission and describe quality of life at D90 in patients alive at D90.
Time Frame: 90 days after inclusion
Quality of life measured by the EQ5D score at D90 (in hospital or at home).
90 days after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 29, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Septic Shock

Subscribe