Pilot-testing the Effect of Magnetic Mitohormesis Therapy for Treating Frailty in Older Adults

July 3, 2023 updated by: Andrew Fruge, Auburn University
Thirty (30) adults with limited physical function will be recruited to participate in a double-blind pilot randomized controlled crossover trial in which all participants will receive 12-weeks of twice weekly MMT treatment in the first (Phase 1) or second half (Phase 2) of the study period; during the control period, participants will receive sham treatment and will be blinded to the randomization.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Auburn, Alabama, United States, 36849
        • Recruiting
        • Auburn University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • physical frailty or pre-frailty, indicated by Short Physical Performance Battery Score <10;
  • intact cognition indicated by a Mini-Cog Screening Test Score > 2;
  • able to read and write in English; and
  • access to a telephone.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • active malignancy;
  • neuro-degenerative disease
  • active electronic implants;
  • any health conditions that would prevent performing the testing and intervention procedures;
  • major surgical procedures within the last 6 months;
  • major change in prescription medications within the last 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Delayed intervention
Sham treatment first, then Magnetic Mitohormesis Therapy treatment
The MMT device that will be used in the trial will be the QuantumTx BIXEPS Fitness and Wellness. The apparatus will provide pulsed electromagnetic fields at flux densities 1.5 mT. During the treatment period, participants will receive PEMF therapy during two ten-minute sessions each week for a total of 12 weeks. The treatment period will be preceded or followed by 12 weeks of twice-weekly sham treatments depending on randomization.
Other Names:
  • Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy
Experimental: Immediate intervention
Magnetic Mitohormesis Therapy treatment first, then Sham treatment
The MMT device that will be used in the trial will be the QuantumTx BIXEPS Fitness and Wellness. The apparatus will provide pulsed electromagnetic fields at flux densities 1.5 mT. During the treatment period, participants will receive PEMF therapy during two ten-minute sessions each week for a total of 12 weeks. The treatment period will be preceded or followed by 12 weeks of twice-weekly sham treatments depending on randomization.
Other Names:
  • Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of adherence to intervention
Time Frame: 24 weeks
75% session attendance
24 weeks
Number of sites successfully recruited
Time Frame: 1 year
Study recruitment, intervention, and data collection will be conducted at independent and assisted living facilities. Thus, reaching target accrual requires successful recruitment of these facilities. This outcome measures the actual number of study sites/facilities agreeing to and providing physical access and support to conduct the study.
1 year
Likert scale assessment of protocol implementation
Time Frame: 1 year
Study staff assessment of device usability and assessment protocol. Two questions with likert scale responses ranging from 1-5, with a higher score meaning a better outcome.
1 year
Likert scale assessment of participant satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Participant Satisfaction Survey. Eight questions with likert scale responses ranging from 1-5, with a higher score meaning a better outcome.
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Frailty - Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks
Repeated Chair stand, balance test, and 4-meter walk composite score (0-12), with higher scores indicating a better outcome
Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks
Physical activity - accelerometry
Time Frame: Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks
Number of daily steps, with higher scores indicating a better outcome
Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks
Grip strength
Time Frame: Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks
handheld dynamometry, with higher scores indicating a better outcome
Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks
Quality of Life T-score
Time Frame: Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks
Research ANd Development (RAND) Short Form-12 will assess mental and physical quality of life, with higher scores indicating a better outcome
Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks
Subjective Frailty score (0-5)
Time Frame: Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks
Frail questionnaire, with higher scores indicating a better outcome
Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks
SWAY Memory Score
Time Frame: Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks
SWAY Memory Test Score, ranging from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome
Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks
Body composition
Time Frame: Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks
Body Impedence Analyzer (InBody 720) lean body mass (in kilograms)
Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pao-Feng Tsai, PhD, Auburn University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 26, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AU MMT 23

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frailty

Clinical Trials on Magnetic Mitohormesis Therapy

Subscribe