A Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy of Magnetic Resonant Therapy in Autism

July 11, 2024 updated by: Wave Neuroscience

A Randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Trial To Evaluate The Treatment Efficacy of Magnetic Resonant Therapy in Autistic Disorder

The purpose of this study is to show that a magnetic field applied to the front part of the brain of children suffering from Autism Spectrum Disorder(ASD) can improve function and ameliorate symptoms.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92660
        • Brain Treatment Center
    • Georgia
      • Buford, Georgia, United States, 30518
        • Brain Treatment Center of Atlanta

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) rendered by the examination and sufficient Childhood Autism Rating Scale 2nd Edition (CARS-2) score to qualify as autism.
  • CARS-2 score between 36 and 47 inclusively
  • Age between 4 and 12 years (at day of informed consent)
  • Child must suffer disrupted sleep patterns defined as a minimum of 3 nights per week of delayed onset of sleep or night-time awakenings. If these are medicated with mild sedatives or melatonin and corrected, the requirement for medication or melatonin will qualify as evidence of a sleep disorder.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Asperger's Disorder, Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise specified
  • History of clinically significant traumatic brain injury
  • Any condition associated with increased intracranial pressure
  • Cerebral Aneurysm
  • Down's Syndrome or other chromosomal abnormality
  • EEG abnormalities that indicate seizure risk
  • Intracranial implant
  • Unstable medical condition not otherwise specified
  • Clinically significant organic disease unrelated to autism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Magnetic Resonance Therapy (MRT)-Active
Magnetic Field, modulated as per EEG analysis, is active for 6 seconds every minute for 30 minutes per day, 5 days per week x 5 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Magnetic Resonance Therapy (MRT)-Sham
Magnetic field is not active, but a sham coil is used, for 6 seconds every minute for 30 minutes per day, 5 days per week x 5 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Childhood Autism Rating Scale 2nd Edition (CARS2)
Time Frame: 5 Weeks

The Childhood Autism Rating Scale is a behavior rating scale that measures the severity of autism symptoms in children. It consists of 15 sub-domains including relating to people, adaptation to change, verbal communication, and visual response. Each sub-domain is rated between 1-4, with the total score ranging from a low of 15 to a high of 60. Scores below 30 indicate that the individual is in the non-autistic range. Scores between 30 and 36.5 indicate mild to moderate autism, and scores from 37 to 60 indicate severe autism. A higher CARS score represents more severe symptoms.

In the present study, the primary outcome was numerical change in CARS score between baseline and Week 5 (end of the double-blind portion of the study). The comparison of the mean and standard deviation between groups is reported.

Difference in CARS score between the baseline and week 5 (end of double-blind portion of the study). CARS value at 5 weeks minus CARS value at baseline.

5 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Keun-Young Kim, MD

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

November 15, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No Identifiable Patient Data (IPD) will be shared.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on Magnetic Resonance Therapy (MRT)-Active

Subscribe