A Study Evaluating the Effect of Frozen-Section Directed Excision Surgery on Vulvar Dysplasia

A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Study Evaluating the Effect of Frozen-Section Directed Excision on Positive Surgical Margins in High-grade Vulvar Dysplasia

The purpose of this study is to compare "Frozen-Section Directed Excision", which has been a proven method of surgery used in dermatology, versus the current, standard method called "Wide Local Excision" to treat high-grade vulvar dysplasia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized, single-blinded study. The target population is adults ≥ 18 years of age with histological or cytological confirmation of VIN 2, VIN 3, VIN 2/3 or High-grade Dysplasia NOS with a planned excisional procedure, with high suspicion by the enrolling investigator that gross surgical margins of ≥ 3 mm can be achieved without laser or other destructive procedures. One group of subjects will be assigned to the Frozen-Section Directed Excision surgery arm and will undergo this procedure. The other group of subjects will be assigned to the Wide Local Excision (standard of care) arm and will undergo this procedure. The randomization will be 1:1, meaning for every subject who gets assigned to the Frozen-Section Directed Excision surgery arm, one will also be assigned to the Wide Local Excision arm. There is a 50% chance of getting randomized to either the Frozen-Section Directed Excision procedure or Wide Local Excision. Information regarding the surgery procedure, the amount of time the surgery procedure takes, and total amount of pain medication required during surgery and while in the surgery recovery area will be collected. The study team will also look at recurrence rates (return of the cancer) in six months, if any other therapies are required, and subject satisfaction related to the surgery, recovery, and sexual function by using questionnaires before and after the procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

112

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • Levine Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Written informed consent and HIPAA authorization for release of personal health information.
  2. Age ≥ 18 years at the time of consent
  3. Histological or cytological confirmation of VIN 2, VIN 3, VIN 2/3 or High-grade Dysplasia NOS with a planned excisional procedure, with high suspicion by the enrolling investigator that gross surgical margins of ≥ 3 mm can be achieved without laser or other destructive procedures
  4. Surgery is expected to occur within 90 days from randomization
  5. Ability to read and understand the English and/or Spanish language
  6. As determined by the enrolling physician, ability and willingness of the subject to comply with study procedures for the entire length of the study
  7. No known pregnancy

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Excision is not possible due to anatomy (proximity to urethra/clitoris)
  2. Known immunodeficiency syndrome
  3. Immunosuppressant medications taken within the last 30 days (HIV, organ transplant recipient, chronic steroid use/immunosuppressant)
  4. History of pelvic region radiation therapy
  5. Active anticancer treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Frozen-Section Directed Excision Vulvectomy
The surgeon(s) will identify the lesion and make a 1 mm excision around the lesion site.
Frozen-Section Directed Excision (FSDE) is a surgical technique with evaluation of margin status during the surgical procedure, similar to the established Mohs Surgical Technique. The use of FSDE may ensure negative margins, decrease unnecessary excision of healthy tissue and has the potential to greatly reduce positive margins.
Other Names:
  • FSDE
Active Comparator: Wide Local Excision Vulvectomy
The surgeon(s) will visually identify the abnormal lesion. A Wide Local Excision with 5 mm margins will be made through the dermis per standard of care.
Standard of care surgical technique utilized for VIN 2, VIN3, VIN 2/3 or High-grade Dysplasia NOS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of positive margins for VIN 2, VIN 3, VIN 2/3 or High-grade Dysplasia NOS
Time Frame: At the time of the resection
Comparison of rates of positive margins for VIN 2, VIN 3, VIN 2/3 or High-grade Dysplasia NOS in subjects who undergo standard of care Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
At the time of the resection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence rates at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months post resection surgery
Comparison of recurrence rates in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
6 months post resection surgery
Surgical time
Time Frame: At the time of the resection
Comparison of surgical time in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
At the time of the resection
Recovery room time
Time Frame: At the time of the resection and recovery
Comparison of recovery room time in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
At the time of the resection and recovery
Narcotic dose required (total during surgery and in recovery)
Time Frame: At the time of the resection and recovery
Comparison of narcotic dose required in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
At the time of the resection and recovery
Blood loss
Time Frame: At the time of the resection
Comparison of blood loss in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
At the time of the resection
Primary wound closure rates
Time Frame: 2-week post resection surgery
Comparison of primary wound closure rates in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
2-week post resection surgery
Post-operative quality of life as determined by the SSQ-8
Time Frame: 2-weeks and 6 months after resection surgery
Comparison of post-operative quality of life as determined by the SSQ-8 in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
2-weeks and 6 months after resection surgery
Sexual function as determined by the FSFI
Time Frame: Screening and 6 months after resection surgery
Comparison of sexual function as determined by the FSFI in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
Screening and 6 months after resection surgery
Wound bed size after surgery
Time Frame: End of resection surgery
Comparison of wound bed size after surgery in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
End of resection surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert W Naumann, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 7, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 24, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 24, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00094930
  • P30CA012197 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • LCI-GYN-VUL-FSDE-001 (Other Identifier: Atrium Health)
  • NCI-2024-03779 (Other Identifier: National Cancer Institute)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vulvar Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Frozen-Section Directed Excision

Subscribe