Multidisciplinary Digital Therapeutics of Chronic Lower Back Pain Versus Usual Care

February 7, 2024 updated by: EverEx Inc.

Multidisciplinary Digital Therapeutics for Chronic Low Back Pain Versus In-person Education Combined With Physiotherapy, a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

This randomized controlled pilot study will be evaluating an app, MORT-LBP app (ETH-02K), owned by EverEx, Inc., to examine safety and efficacy in individuals with chronic lower back pain.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled pilot study will enroll 46 participants, where half will be randomly assigned to the app, MORT-LBP (n = 23), and half will be assigned to treatment as usual (TAU) (n = 23), to examine safety and efficacy in individuals with chronic lower back pain. All subjects will be followed up in the study for a total of 12 weeks, 8-week courses of treatment with additional 4-week observation. The app provides multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment, a combination of graded exercise therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy for patients with chronic lower back pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 11923
        • Recruiting
        • Hanyang University GURI Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03082
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul National University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female ≥ 19 and <65 years of age
  • Patients who have a history of lower back pain persisting for longer than 12 weeks
  • Patients who have average back pain score of 3 or more on the numeric rating scale (NRS)
  • Patients who can use application-based therapy with his/her smartphone
  • Patients who signed a written informed consent form
  • Patients who are able to comply with the plan, as determined by the study investigator.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have previous history of spinal surgery
  • Patients who have previous history of spinal trauma within 3 months
  • Patients with lower extremity radicular pain with sensory and motor dysfunction
  • Patients with lower extremity muscle strength of 3 or less on a manual muscle test
  • Patients with spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis
  • Patients with other structural abnormalities of the spine, including scoliosis (Cobb's angle > 10 degrees) or kyphosis (lordotic angle < 0 degrees)
  • Patients with red flag signs (paralyzing symptoms such as fecal impairment, sudden unexplained weight loss)
  • Patients with tumors, infections, metabolic bone disease, cognitive impairment, fibromyalgia, and systemic inflammatory diseases
  • Patients with other systemic disease conditions that limit exercise therapy, as determined by the study investigator
  • Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Patients with known substance/alcohol use disorders
  • Patients who are not able to participate in an exercise or strengthening program
  • Patients taking opioid analgesic medications with a potency greater than or equal to tramadol for other conditions or low back pain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MORT-LBP
Participants randomly assigned to this arm will use the app, MORT-LBP.
The MORT-LBP, developed by EverEx, Inc., is designed to provide multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment, a combination of graded exercise therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with chronic lower back pain.
Active Comparator: treatment as usual (TAU)
Participants randomly assigned to this arm will receive their TAU only (no use of the app, MORT-LBP).
In the control group, education and physiotherapy is delivered and self-exercise is recommended.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usual pain severity in the past week assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The primary outcome being measure is differences in usual pain severity in the past week between groups after the intervention. NRS score was measured from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
8 weeks
Worst pain severity in the past week assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The primary outcome being measure is differences in worst pain severity in the past week between groups after the intervention. NRS score was measured from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
8 weeks
Functional disability assessed by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The primary outcome being measure is differences in functional disability between groups after the intervention. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a patient reported assessment of chronic lower back pain-specific functional limitations. It has 10 questions, total score ranging from 0 to 50, and ODI is calculated with (total score)/(answered question number * 5)*100%. Higher index means worse outcome.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life assessed by EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12 weeks
The secondary outcome being measure is differences in health-related quality of life between groups at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. It measures five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, with three possible answers for each dimension (1=no problem, 2=moderate problem, 3=severe problem). The instrument also includes a visual analogue scale, which is numbered from 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine).
4, 8, 12 weeks
Assessment of mental health symptoms specific to depression as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 8, 12 weeks
Differences in mental health symptoms between groups at 8, 12 weeks. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) total score for the nine items ranges from 0 to 27 (higher scores indicating greater severity of depression).
8, 12 weeks
Assessment of catastrophic thinking measured by Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time Frame: 8, 12 weeks
Differences in levels of catastrophic thinking between groups at 8, 12 weeks. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13-item scale, with a total range of 0 to 52 (higher scores indicating higher amounts of pain catastrophizing).
8, 12 weeks
Assessment of fear avoidance behaviours measured by Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)
Time Frame: 8, 12 weeks
Differences in fear avoidance behaviours between groups at 8, 12 weeks. The Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) is a 16-item scale, with a total range of 0 to 96 (higher scores indicating higher amounts of fear avoidance behaviours).
8, 12 weeks
Use of rescue medication
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12 weeks
Differences in use of rescue medication between groups at 4, 8, 12 weeks.
4, 8, 12 weeks
Assessment of retention in treatment
Time Frame: 4, 8 weeks
Differences in retention rates between groups at 4, 8 weeks.
4, 8 weeks
Ususal pain severity in the past week assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 4, 12 weeks
The secondary outcome being measure is differences in usual pain severity in the past week between groups at 4 and 12 weeks. NRS score was measured from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
4, 12 weeks
Worst pain severity in the past week assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 4, 12 weeks
The secondary outcome being measure is differences in worst pain severity in the past week between groups at 4 and 12 weeks. NRS score was measured from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
4, 12 weeks
Functional disability assessed by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 4, 12 weeks
The secondary outcome being measure is differences in functional disability between groups at 4 and 12 weeks. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a patient reported assessment of chronic lower back pain-specific functional limitations. It has 10 questions, total score ranging from 0 to 50, and ODI is calculated with (total score)/(answered question number * 5)*100%. Higher index means worse outcome.
4, 12 weeks
Assessment of spinal alignment status measured by X-ray
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Differences in Cobb's angle, distances from the plumb line of C7, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and distances from the plumb line of C7 and posterosuperior edge of S1 vertebral body between group after intervention.
8 weeks
Assessment of Equilibrium Ability by Single-limb stance test
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12 weeks
Differences in single-limb stance test between group at 4, 8, 12 weeks. The single limb stance test measures how long a individual can stand on each leg for up to 20 seconds.
4, 8, 12 weeks
Assessment of Muscular Endurance by Prone bridge test and Borg CR10 Scale (2010)
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12 weeks
Differences in prone bridge test test between group at 4, 8, 12 weeks. The prone bridge test measures how long a individual can stand prone bridge test for up to 120 seconds. Afterward, Borg CR10 Scale (2010), the rating of perceived exertion after physical activity is measured. It ranges from 0 to 10 (higher scores indicating more sensation of hardness).
4, 8, 12 weeks
Changes of usual and worst pain severity in the past week assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12 weeks
The secondary outcome being measure is differences in changes of usual pain severity, worst pain severity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D), Single-limb stance test, Prone bridge test and Borg CR10 Scale (2010) from baseline to 4, 8, and 12 weeks between groups. NRS score was measured from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
4, 8, 12 weeks
Changes of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12 weeks
The secondary outcome being measure is differences in changes of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D) from baseline to 4, 8, and 12 weeks between groups. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a patient reported assessment of chronic lower back pain-specific functional limitations. It has 10 questions, total score ranging from 0 to 50, and ODI is calculated with (total score)/(answered question number * 5)*100%. Higher index means worse outcome. EQ-5D measures five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, with three possible answers for each dimension (1=no problem, 2=moderate problem, 3=severe problem). The instrument also includes a visual analogue scale, which is numbered from 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine).
4, 8, 12 weeks
Changes of Single-limb stance test, Prone bridge test and Borg CR10 Scale (2010)
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12 weeks
The secondary outcome being measure is differences in changes of single-limb stance test, prone bridge test and Borg CR10 Scale (2010) from baseline to 4, 8, and 12 weeks between groups. The single limb stance test measures how long a individual can stand on each leg for up to 20 seconds. The prone bridge test measures how long a individual can stand prone bridge test for up to 120 seconds. Afterward, Borg CR10 Scale (2010), the rating of perceived exertion after physical activity is measured. It ranges from 0 to 10 (higher scores indicating more sensation of hardness).
4, 8, 12 weeks
Assessment of app usability by surveys
Time Frame: 4, 8 weeks
Differences in app usability survey score between groups at 4, 8 weeks. The survey comprises 8 questions, with total score ranging from 0 to 40. Higher score indicates better user experience.
4, 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sam Yeol Chang, M.D., Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 4, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 17, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • E-ETH-02K-CTP-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low-back Pain

Clinical Trials on MORT-LBP

3
Subscribe