Digital Clinical Hypnosis for Chronic Pain Management

December 31, 2025 updated by: Mark Jensen, University of Washington

This ClinicalTrials.gov posting contains two randomized controlled trials. The study procedures were identical, except Study 1 was funded by NIH and enrolled adults with chronic low back pain, whereas Study 2 was funded by the UW Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and enrolled adults with any type of chronic pain. Study 1 and 2 each enrolled 50 adults (N = 100 total across the two studies). Although Study 2 did not use NIH funds, we are including the results here because the studies were conducted simultaneously by the same PI (Dr. Jensen) with the same study procedures.

Participants enrolled in the studies for a duration of 8 weeks. The studies test the feasibility and efficacy of a therapeutic hypnosis digital application (website), called Rose. The investigators wanted to determine if the Rose application was user-friendly and effective at improving quality of life and reducing pain for adults with chronic pain. If successfuly, the investigators hope to develop the Rose application into a mobile app that will be publicly available and managed by HypnoScientific Inc., a company that is co-owned by the investigators.

Participants completed brief (15-20min) self-report surveys that ask about pain and mental health at three timepoints: Baseline (week 0), 4 weeks, and 8 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Pain is a major public health problem that affects over 100 million adults in the United States. While pain can have profound negative impacts, current treatment remains inadequate. A focus on opioid treatments has led to over-prescription, harmful side effects, and the overuse crisis. To address this problem, the study investigators, and others, have developed and adapted hypnosis to empower individuals to self-manage pain. Findings from the investigators' research supports hypnosis as an effective non-pharmacological technique. However, a significant limitation of hypnosis treatment is access, given that hypnosis treatment is provided by a very limited number of clinicians with training in its use, as well as the significant costs of in-person treatment.

The main goal of this study is to pilot test the efficacy of hypnosis content for pain management as provided via recordings in the Rose web application.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
        • University of Washington, School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria (self-report online and telephone screening by study staff):

  • 18 years old or older
  • Chronic Pain or Chronic Low Back Pain (i.e., pain in the low back that has been an ongoing problem for 3 months or more for at least half the days, as disclosed during self-report screening. The pain can be a primary condition or secondary to another health condition.
  • Average pain intensity in the past week ≥ 4 on a 0-10 scale
  • Reads, speaks, and understands English as noted in the medical record or disclosed during self-report screening
  • Has regular access to the internet
  • Has access to devices (phone, desktop, or other) with features (browsers, audio capabilities, etc.) that are congruent with the requirements of the digital therapeutic, as assessed by staff members during self-report screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of (within past 5 years) or current diagnosis of primary psychotic or major thought disorder with active symptoms as noted in the medical record or disclosed during self-report screening
  • Psychiatric hospitalization within the past 6 months as noted in the medical record or disclosed during self-report screening
  • Psychiatric or behavioral conditions in which symptoms were unstable or severe within the past 6 months as noted in the medical record or disclosed during self-report screening;
  • Any psychiatric or behavioral issues as noted in the medical record or disclosed/observed during self-report screening that would indicate subject may be inappropriate for study;
  • Presenting symptoms at the time of screening that would interfere with participation, specifically active suicidal ideation with intent to harm oneself or others or active delusional or psychotic thinking;
  • Active malignancy (e.g., cancer not in remission) as noted in the medical record or disclosed during self-report screening;
  • Pain condition for which surgery is recommended and/or planned in the next six months as disclosed during self-report screening;
  • Currently receiving or have received hypnosis treatment for any pain condition as disclosed during self-report screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment
8 weeks of access to Rose web application (online hypnosis recordings)
A web application (Rose) that contains hypnosis audio recordings created by the investigators.
Active Comparator: Waitlist Control
4 weeks of waitlist (no access to Rose application for 4 weeks and then 4 weeks of access to Rose web application)
A web application (Rose) that contains hypnosis audio recordings created by the investigators.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of Using Rose Application
Time Frame: During the 8 weeks of study participation
Total # of hypnosis sessions listened to by participants
During the 8 weeks of study participation
Continued Interest in Using Rose Application
Time Frame: 8 week assessment

Participants reporting how interested they would be in continuing to use the Rose application: "If the Rose web/phone application were available to download, how interested would you be in downloading and using this application?" 4 - Extremely interested 3 - Very interested 2 - Somewhat interested

1 - Little interested 0 - Not interested

8 week assessment
Willingness to Pay for Continued Use of Rose Application
Time Frame: 8 week assessment

Participants that reported a willingness to pay for continued access to the Rose application (results available for Study 2 only): "Would you be willing to pay some amount for a monthly subscription to Rose, to have continued access?"

1 - Yes 0 - No

8 week assessment
Participant Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 Week, 8 Week timepoints

Participants answered a Global Satisfaction question about their satisfaction with using the Rose application "Taking all things into account, how satisfied are you with using the Rose web application?" 4 - Very Satisfied 3 - Somewhat Satisfied 2 - Neutral

1 - Somewhat Dissatisfied 0 - Very Dissatisfied

4 Week, 8 Week timepoints
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: 8 Week Timepoint
Scale title: System Usability Scale. Minimum - Maximum range: 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate more usability (ease of use). There are no subscale scores for this measure.
8 Week Timepoint

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Pain - Past Week
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 Weeks, 8 Weeks
A 0-10 Numerical Rating scale of average pain in the past week: "Please rate your pain by choosing the one number that best describes your pain at its WORST in the PAST WEEK, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "pain as bad as you can imagine"
Baseline, 4 Weeks, 8 Weeks
Worst Pain - Past Week
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 Weeks, 8 Weeks
A 0-10 Numerical Rating scale of worst pain in the past week: "Please rate your pain by choosing the one number that best describes your pain at its WORST in the PAST WEEK, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "pain as bad as you can imagine"
Baseline, 4 Weeks, 8 Weeks
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8a
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), 4 week assessment, 8 week assessment

Domain assessed: Sleep Disturbance. Ratings are summed and converted to T scores (Mean = 50 and SD = 10 in the normative sample).

Higher scores indicate more sleep disturbance. Scores that are >= 55 (i.e., one half a SD above the normative mean) are considered clinically elevated.

Baseline (week 0), 4 week assessment, 8 week assessment
PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), 4 week assessment, 8 week assessment

Domain assessed: Pain interference. Ratings are summed and converted to T scores (Mean = 50 and SD = 10 in the normative sample).

Higher scores indicate more pain interference. Scores that are >= 55 (i.e., one half a SD above the normative mean) are considered clinically elevated.

Baseline (week 0), 4 week assessment, 8 week assessment
PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 7a
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), 4 week assessment, 8 week assessment

Domain assessed: Anxiety. Ratings are summed and converted to T scores (Mean = 50 and SD = 10 in the normative sample).

Higher scores indicate more anxiety. Scores that are >= 55 (i.e., one half a SD above the normative mean) are considered clinically elevated.

Baseline (week 0), 4 week assessment, 8 week assessment
Number of Participants Using Opioids
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), 4 week assessment, 8 week assessment

Domain assessed: Opioid Use How assessed: Single item asking participants to indicate whether or not they currently using any opioid mediations.

Unit of measure is the number and rate of participants who indicated that they are currently using at least one opioid medication.

Baseline (week 0), 4 week assessment, 8 week assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark Jensen, MD, University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00014786
  • R41AT011996 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Hypnosis audio recordings

Subscribe