- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05945147
Ketamine and Midazolam Infusions for CRPS: Feasibility Study
Feasibility Study Comparing a Ketamine and Midazolam Infusion to a Midazolam-Only Infusion for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Subanesthetic ketamine infusions are a potentially impactful treatment for chronic refractory pain, but the acute psychoactive effects of ketamine complicate successful masking in randomized trials. Multi-day ketamine infusions have produced long-lasting, but not permanent, remission of symptoms in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), a chronic and often debilitating neuropathic pain condition that can affect one or more limbs. In this feasibility study, 4 adults with CRPS will be randomized to receive either ketamine and midazolam or midazolam-only, infused over 5 days in an outpatient setting. The objectives of this feasibility study are:
- Assess whether the recruitment and retention rate observed in this feasibility study can support a larger clinical trial.
- Evaluate whether participants can adhere to study procedures.
- Determine whether midazolam, when given alone as an intravenous (IV) infusion, can be used as an active placebo that is well-tolerated, practical, and believable compared to a ketamine plus midazolam infusion.
- Gather preliminary data on clinically-relevant outcomes for CRPS.
Study Type
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Stanford, California, United States, 94305
- Stanford University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
- Age 18 to 65 years
- Meets the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)
- Primary complaint of CRPS-attributable pain for ≥3 months
- Average pain intensity of ≥3/10 over the last month
- Can read and comprehend English-language questionnaires
- Can receive text messages by phone
- Can identify a responsible adult who can provide transportation to and from infusion site for 5 consecutive days (Mon-Fri)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ketamine and Midazolam
Participants will receive intravenous infusions of ketamine and midazolam for 4 hours each day, over 5 consecutive days, in an outpatient setting.
|
An escalating dose of ketamine (0.15 to 0.4 mg/kg/hr) will be administered as 4-hour infusions over 5 consecutive days
Other Names:
A constant dose of midazolam (0.04 mg/kg/hr) will be administered as 4-hour infusions over 5 consecutive days
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Midazolam and Saline
Participants will receive intravenous infusions of midazolam and normal saline for 4 hours each day, over 5 consecutive days, in an outpatient setting.
|
A constant dose of midazolam (0.04 mg/kg/hr) will be administered as 4-hour infusions over 5 consecutive days
Other Names:
An escalating dose of normal saline (0.15 to 0.4 mg/kg/hr) will be administered as 4-hour infusions over 5 consecutive days
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number and proportion of patients who can undergo the steps of recruitment, informed consent, enrollment, and randomization
Time Frame: 2 months after the study opens for enrollment
|
Out of all patients identified as potentially eligible for the study based on chart review, we will measure the number and proportion who can undergo the steps of recruitment, informed consent, enrollment, and randomization during a 2-month period.
|
2 months after the study opens for enrollment
|
|
Number and proportion of randomized participants who remain in the study until the last follow-up timepoint
Time Frame: 8 weeks after receiving intervention
|
Out of all patients who were randomized to a treatment group, we will measure the number and proportion who remain in the study until their last follow-up timepoint.
|
8 weeks after receiving intervention
|
|
Change in participant masking
Time Frame: Daily during intervention administration (5 days), and once at 8 weeks after receiving intervention
|
Participants will be asked to guess their assigned treatment in a forced binary choice and to rate their level of confidence on a scale from 0 to 100%.
|
Daily during intervention administration (5 days), and once at 8 weeks after receiving intervention
|
|
Change in participant masking
Time Frame: During intervention administration
|
Participants will be asked to guess their assigned treatment in a forced binary choice and to rate their level of confidence on a scale from 0 to 100%.
|
During intervention administration
|
|
Change in investigator masking
Time Frame: 8 weeks after receiving intervention
|
Investigators administering and monitoring the drug infusions will be asked to guess the participant's assigned treatment in a forced binary choice and to rate their level of confidence on a scale from 0 to 100%.
|
8 weeks after receiving intervention
|
|
Change in investigator masking
Time Frame: During intervention administration
|
Investigators administering and monitoring the drug infusions will be asked to guess the participant's assigned treatment in a forced binary choice and to rate their level of confidence on a scale from 0 to 100%.
|
During intervention administration
|
|
Number and types of adverse events
Time Frame: 8 weeks after receiving intervention
|
Adverse events will be elicited from the participant in a brief, open-ended structured interview.
|
8 weeks after receiving intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Baseline, daily during treatment (5 days), and daily for 8 weeks after treatment
|
A numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) over the past 24 hours will be used to assess pain intensity.
|
Baseline, daily during treatment (5 days), and daily for 8 weeks after treatment
|
|
Treatment expectancies
Time Frame: Baseline, and daily during treatment (5 days)
|
The 6-item Healing Encounters and Attitudes Lists (HEAL) Short Form for Treatment Expectancy will be used to assess self-reported expectations about the study treatment.
Participants are asked to rate their agreement with brief statements such as, "This treatment will be successful" and "I am confident in this treatment".
|
Baseline, and daily during treatment (5 days)
|
|
Pain interference
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
The 6-item PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form assesses the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities.
Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Very Much").
Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing greater pain interference.
|
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
|
Physical function
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
The 6-item PROMIS Physical Function Short Form assesses the ability to carry out physical tasks and activities in one's daily life.
Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Unable to do") to 5 ("Without any difficulty").
Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing better physical function.
|
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
|
Depression (PROMIS)
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
The 6-item PROMIS Depression Short Form assesses the severity of depressive symptoms experienced by an individual.
Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Always").
Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing greater depression symptom severity.
|
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
|
Depression (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
The 9-item PHQ-9 will be used as an additional indicator for changes in depression symptom severity, and to monitor for any risk of acute suicidality during the trial (item #9: "Thoughts that you would be better off dead, or of hurting yourself").
Items are self-rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 3 ("Nearly every day").
Higher total scores indicate greater depression symptom severity.
|
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
|
Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
The 6-item PROMIS Anxiety Short Form assesses the severity of anxiety symptoms experienced by an individual.
Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Always").
Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing greater anxiety symptom severity.
|
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
|
Sleep disturbance
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
The 6-item PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form assesses the severity of sleep-related issues, such as trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, and experiencing non-restorative sleep.
Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Very Much").
Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing greater sleep disturbance.
|
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
|
Pain catastrophizing
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
The 13-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale assesses the extent to which an individual engages in magnifying, rumination, and helplessness thoughts related to their pain experience.
Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("All the time").
Higher total scores indicates higher levels of pain catastrophizing.
|
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
|
Chronic pain acceptance
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
The 8-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire assesses one's level of acceptance and willingness to engage in valued activities despite the presence of chronic pain.
Items are self-rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 ("Never true") to 6 ("Always true").
Higher total scores indicate greater levels of chronic pain acceptance.
|
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
|
Patient global impression of change
Time Frame: Weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
The Patient Global Impression of Change scale assesses the patient's perception of change in their overall health status resulting from a specific treatment.
The single-item scale is self-rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 ("Very much improved") to 7 ("Very much worse").
|
Weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
|
Number of painful body regions
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
The CHOIR Body Map is a visual tool that allows individuals to indicate the location(s) of their pain on a human body outline.
|
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Theresa R Lii, MD, MS, Stanford University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Nervous System Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
- Disease
- Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
- Syndrome
- Complex Regional Pain Syndromes
- Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Sensory System Agents
- Analgesics
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Adjuvants, Anesthesia
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- GABA Modulators
- GABA Agents
- Excitatory Amino Acid Agents
- Anesthetics, Dissociative
- Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists
- Midazolam
- Ketamine
Other Study ID Numbers
- 66661
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Complex Regional Pain Syndromes
-
Bo Biering-SoerensenMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbH; The GCP unit at Copenhagen University HospitalRecruitingCRPS (Complex Regional Pain Syndromes) | CRPS Type II | CRPS (Complex Regional Pain Syndrome) Type IDenmark
-
Oulu University HospitalThe Maud Kuistila Memorial FoundationRecruitingCRPS (Complex Regional Pain Syndromes)Finland
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkCompletedCRPS (Complex Regional Pain Syndromes)United States
-
Danish Pain Research CenterCompleted
-
Danish Pain Research CenterCompletedCRPS (Complex Regional Pain Syndromes)Denmark
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityPriCara, Unit of Ortho-McNeil, Inc.CompletedPeripheral Neuropathy | Complex Regional Pain Syndromes (CRPS)
-
University Hospital, AngersRecruitingComplex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I of the Upper LimbFrance
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedComplex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)United States
-
Stanford UniversityCompleted
-
AZ DeltaVrije Universiteit BrusselCompletedCRPS (Complex Regional Pain Syndrome) Type IBelgium
Clinical Trials on Ketamine
-
Giresun UniversityActive, not recruitingGastrointestinal Endoscopy | Procedural SedationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of RochesterNot yet recruitingChronic Pain | Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)United States
-
Soterix MedicalColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NYNot yet recruiting
-
Konya City HospitalCompletedCardiac SurgeryTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Boston Children's HospitalNot yet recruitingSickle Cell Disease | Sickle Cell CrisisUnited States
-
Grace Lim, MD, MSNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedPain, Postoperative | Depression, PostpartumUnited States
-
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterWithdrawn
-
King Abdullah University HospitalJordan University of Science and TechnologyRecruitingPain Management | Laparascopic Sleeve GastrectomyJordan
-
Sheba Medical CenterNot yet recruiting
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting