Ketamine and Midazolam Infusions for CRPS: Feasibility Study

November 20, 2024 updated by: Theresa Lii, Stanford University

Feasibility Study Comparing a Ketamine and Midazolam Infusion to a Midazolam-Only Infusion for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

This study will assess the feasibility of administering ketamine plus midazolam or midazolam alone, when infused over 5 days in an outpatient setting, to adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Subanesthetic ketamine infusions are a potentially impactful treatment for chronic refractory pain, but the acute psychoactive effects of ketamine complicate successful masking in randomized trials. Multi-day ketamine infusions have produced long-lasting, but not permanent, remission of symptoms in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), a chronic and often debilitating neuropathic pain condition that can affect one or more limbs. In this feasibility study, 4 adults with CRPS will be randomized to receive either ketamine and midazolam or midazolam-only, infused over 5 days in an outpatient setting. The objectives of this feasibility study are:

  1. Assess whether the recruitment and retention rate observed in this feasibility study can support a larger clinical trial.
  2. Evaluate whether participants can adhere to study procedures.
  3. Determine whether midazolam, when given alone as an intravenous (IV) infusion, can be used as an active placebo that is well-tolerated, practical, and believable compared to a ketamine plus midazolam infusion.
  4. Gather preliminary data on clinically-relevant outcomes for CRPS.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

  • Age 18 to 65 years
  • Meets the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)
  • Primary complaint of CRPS-attributable pain for ≥3 months
  • Average pain intensity of ≥3/10 over the last month
  • Can read and comprehend English-language questionnaires
  • Can receive text messages by phone
  • Can identify a responsible adult who can provide transportation to and from infusion site for 5 consecutive days (Mon-Fri)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ketamine and Midazolam
Participants will receive intravenous infusions of ketamine and midazolam for 4 hours each day, over 5 consecutive days, in an outpatient setting.
An escalating dose of ketamine (0.15 to 0.4 mg/kg/hr) will be administered as 4-hour infusions over 5 consecutive days
Other Names:
  • Ketalar
A constant dose of midazolam (0.04 mg/kg/hr) will be administered as 4-hour infusions over 5 consecutive days
Other Names:
  • Versed
Placebo Comparator: Midazolam and Saline
Participants will receive intravenous infusions of midazolam and normal saline for 4 hours each day, over 5 consecutive days, in an outpatient setting.
A constant dose of midazolam (0.04 mg/kg/hr) will be administered as 4-hour infusions over 5 consecutive days
Other Names:
  • Versed
An escalating dose of normal saline (0.15 to 0.4 mg/kg/hr) will be administered as 4-hour infusions over 5 consecutive days
Other Names:
  • 0.9% Sodium Chloride

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number and proportion of patients who can undergo the steps of recruitment, informed consent, enrollment, and randomization
Time Frame: 2 months after the study opens for enrollment
Out of all patients identified as potentially eligible for the study based on chart review, we will measure the number and proportion who can undergo the steps of recruitment, informed consent, enrollment, and randomization during a 2-month period.
2 months after the study opens for enrollment
Number and proportion of randomized participants who remain in the study until the last follow-up timepoint
Time Frame: 8 weeks after receiving intervention
Out of all patients who were randomized to a treatment group, we will measure the number and proportion who remain in the study until their last follow-up timepoint.
8 weeks after receiving intervention
Change in participant masking
Time Frame: Daily during intervention administration (5 days), and once at 8 weeks after receiving intervention
Participants will be asked to guess their assigned treatment in a forced binary choice and to rate their level of confidence on a scale from 0 to 100%.
Daily during intervention administration (5 days), and once at 8 weeks after receiving intervention
Change in participant masking
Time Frame: During intervention administration
Participants will be asked to guess their assigned treatment in a forced binary choice and to rate their level of confidence on a scale from 0 to 100%.
During intervention administration
Change in investigator masking
Time Frame: 8 weeks after receiving intervention
Investigators administering and monitoring the drug infusions will be asked to guess the participant's assigned treatment in a forced binary choice and to rate their level of confidence on a scale from 0 to 100%.
8 weeks after receiving intervention
Change in investigator masking
Time Frame: During intervention administration
Investigators administering and monitoring the drug infusions will be asked to guess the participant's assigned treatment in a forced binary choice and to rate their level of confidence on a scale from 0 to 100%.
During intervention administration
Number and types of adverse events
Time Frame: 8 weeks after receiving intervention
Adverse events will be elicited from the participant in a brief, open-ended structured interview.
8 weeks after receiving intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Baseline, daily during treatment (5 days), and daily for 8 weeks after treatment
A numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) over the past 24 hours will be used to assess pain intensity.
Baseline, daily during treatment (5 days), and daily for 8 weeks after treatment
Treatment expectancies
Time Frame: Baseline, and daily during treatment (5 days)
The 6-item Healing Encounters and Attitudes Lists (HEAL) Short Form for Treatment Expectancy will be used to assess self-reported expectations about the study treatment. Participants are asked to rate their agreement with brief statements such as, "This treatment will be successful" and "I am confident in this treatment".
Baseline, and daily during treatment (5 days)
Pain interference
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
The 6-item PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form assesses the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Very Much"). Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing greater pain interference.
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
Physical function
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
The 6-item PROMIS Physical Function Short Form assesses the ability to carry out physical tasks and activities in one's daily life. Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Unable to do") to 5 ("Without any difficulty"). Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing better physical function.
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
Depression (PROMIS)
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
The 6-item PROMIS Depression Short Form assesses the severity of depressive symptoms experienced by an individual. Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Always"). Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing greater depression symptom severity.
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
Depression (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
The 9-item PHQ-9 will be used as an additional indicator for changes in depression symptom severity, and to monitor for any risk of acute suicidality during the trial (item #9: "Thoughts that you would be better off dead, or of hurting yourself"). Items are self-rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 3 ("Nearly every day"). Higher total scores indicate greater depression symptom severity.
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
The 6-item PROMIS Anxiety Short Form assesses the severity of anxiety symptoms experienced by an individual. Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Always"). Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing greater anxiety symptom severity.
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
Sleep disturbance
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
The 6-item PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form assesses the severity of sleep-related issues, such as trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, and experiencing non-restorative sleep. Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Very Much"). Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing greater sleep disturbance.
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
Pain catastrophizing
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
The 13-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale assesses the extent to which an individual engages in magnifying, rumination, and helplessness thoughts related to their pain experience. Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("All the time"). Higher total scores indicates higher levels of pain catastrophizing.
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
Chronic pain acceptance
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
The 8-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire assesses one's level of acceptance and willingness to engage in valued activities despite the presence of chronic pain. Items are self-rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 ("Never true") to 6 ("Always true"). Higher total scores indicate greater levels of chronic pain acceptance.
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
Patient global impression of change
Time Frame: Weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
The Patient Global Impression of Change scale assesses the patient's perception of change in their overall health status resulting from a specific treatment. The single-item scale is self-rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 ("Very much improved") to 7 ("Very much worse").
Weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
Number of painful body regions
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment
The CHOIR Body Map is a visual tool that allows individuals to indicate the location(s) of their pain on a human body outline.
Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Theresa R Lii, MD, MS, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2099

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2099

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2099

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

Clinical Trials on Ketamine

Subscribe