Improving PRO for Patients With Cancer Using ECAs and Data Visualization (ECA-PRO Aim 3)

March 2, 2026 updated by: Tufts Medical Center

Improving PRO Interpretation at the Individual Level for Patients With Cancer Using Conversational Agents and Data Visualization - Aim 3

Over the past decade, the investigators have developed and tested a toll with the potential to enhance PROs at the individual level- embodied conversational agents (ECA), which are computer characters that simulate face-to-face conversation using voice, hand gestures, gaze cues, and other nonverbal behavior. The investigators have successfully used ECAs in behavioral interventions for populations with limited health literacy, elderly patients, and patients with cancer. Face-to-face encounters, in conjunction with written instructions supported by pictures, remains one of the best methods for communicating information in general but is particularly effective for individuals with limited health literacy. The investigators have also demonstrated that ECAs can be used as valid alternatives to standard paper-based surveys for substance use screening, and that the display of empathy for patients and other relational behavior by ECAs leads to increased engagement by patients over time.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Detailed Description

There is increasing recognition of the important of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for assessment of health-related quality of life in both research and clinical settings. PROs are especially important for inherently subjective but crucial clinical phenomena such as pain, mood, and fatigue. PROs can also provide valid assessments of health where performance-based objective measures are possible, but cost prohibitive or complicated. Despite much research on PROs, concerns about reliability and validity persist, especially when used at the individual level, particularly among patients who may struggle to understand PRO questions, such as those with low health literacy.

Over the past decade, the investigators have developed and tested a tool with the potential to enhance PROs at the individual level - embodied conversational agents (ECA), which are computer characters that simulate face-to-face conversation using voice, hand gestures, gaze cues and other nonverbal behavior. The investigators have successfully used ECAs in behavioral interventions for populations with limited health literacy, elderly patients, and patients with cancer. Face-to-face encounters, in conjunction with written instructions supported by pictures, remains one of the best methods for communicating information in general, but is particularly effective for individuals with limited health literacy. The investigators have also demonstrated that ECAs can be used as valid alternatives to standard paper-based surveys for substance use screening, and that the display of empathy for patients and other relational behavior by ECAs leads to increased engagement by patients over time.

The goal of this study is to adapt our prior work on ECAs to produce ECA-PRO, a framework for administering PROs over time using an ECA. ECA-PRO will be used to administer PROs from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), as well as measures from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The plan is to administer PROMIS measures relevant to cancer including physical functioning, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and pain interference. This study will test the system in an RCT with 100 patients receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy for gastrointestinal or head and neck cancer. Participants will be randomized to provide data for 6 weeks using ECA-PRO (n=50) versus standard web administration (REDCap) (n=50).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Boston Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years of age or older
  • Able to read and speak english
  • Can independently consent
  • Must have adequate corrected vision to use the ECA system (based on a 1 minute ECA functional screener)
  • Must have adequate hearing to use the ECA system.
  • Has a diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer or head and neck cancer for which they are currently receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment.
  • Provider subjects must be practicing oncologists at BMC.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If the subject is incarcerated
  • If the subject plans to leave the Boston area in the next 6 weeks
  • Is not able to use the ECA screener

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Embodied Conversational Agent
The ECA systems compromises 1) a smartphone based ECA patient interface; 2) clinician authoring tool, to enable new measurement systems to be rapidly configured 3) clinician and patient data visualizations; and 4) a central server with relation database, administrative user interfaces and ability to send asynchronous notifications to users' smartphones.
The ECA- PRO measures will included PROMIS Profile measures, which include depression, anxiety, fatigue, pain intensity, and interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, physical function, and satisfaction with social roles. In order to reduce boredom and confusion, equivalent forms of different items will be selected from the items pools. In this way, participants are not answering the same questions twice within one session.
Active Comparator: RedCap Survey
An internet-based measure will use PROMIS Profile measures which will include depression, anxiety, fatigue, pain intensity and interference, sleep disturbance, physical function and satisfaction with social role
An internet-based measure will use PROMIS Profile measures which will include depression, anxiety, fatigue, pain intensity and interference, sleep disturbance, physical function and satisfaction with social role

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The degree of missing data will be investigated to gauge the extent to which patients are actively engaging with the ECA-PRO system.
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Assessing the completeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) survey questions, taking into account the number of items that have been satisfactorily completed. By examining prevalence of missing data, the investigators aim to infer the level of patient utilization of the ECA-PRO system.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical function
Time Frame: 6 weeks
There will be items from the PRO-CTCAE survey questions, that will ask participants to report the frequency of their symptoms related to their physical functioning. Participants will fill out this survey with the ECA or in REDCap (depending on the intervention participants are receiving).
6 weeks
Fatigue
Time Frame: 6 weeks
There will be items from the PRO-CTCAE survey questions, that will ask participants to report the frequency of their symptoms related to fatigue. Participants will fill out this survey with the ECA or in REDCap (depending on the intervention participants are receiving).
6 weeks
Depression
Time Frame: 6 weeks
There will be items from the PRO-CTCAE survey questions, that will ask participants to report the frequency of their depression symptoms. Participants will fill out this survey with the ECA or in REDCap (depending on the intervention participants are receiving).
6 weeks
Anxiety
Time Frame: 6 weeks
There will be items from the PRO-CTCAE survey questions, that will ask participants to report the frequency of their anxiety symptoms. Participants will fill out this survey with the ECA or in REDCap (depending on the intervention participants are receiving).
6 weeks
Pain Interference
Time Frame: 6 weeks
There will be items from the PRO-CTCAE survey questions, that will ask participants to report the frequency of pain interference. Participants will fill out this survey with the ECA or in REDCap (depending on the intervention participants are receiving).
6 weeks
Sleep Disturbance
Time Frame: 6 weeks
There will be items from the PRO-CTCAE survey questions, that will ask participants to report the frequency of their sleep disturbance. Participants will fill out this survey with the ECA or in REDCap (depending on the intervention participants are receiving).
6 weeks
Ability to participate in social roles and activities
Time Frame: 6 weeks
There will be items from the PRO-CTCAE survey questions, that will ask participants to report the frequency of their pain and how it impacts their ability to participate in social roles and activities. Participants will fill out this survey with the ECA or in REDCap (depending on the intervention participants are receiving).
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Paasche-Orlow, MD, MPH, Tufts Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 24, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on REDCap Survey

Subscribe