Electronic Capturing of Activities During REhabilitation for Upper Limb After Stroke (eCARE4Stroke)

July 24, 2024 updated by: University of Melbourne

This is a prospective cohort study to determine the feasibility of accurate, complete, and timely real-time electronic capturing of upper limb motor intervention sessions during usual care. In clinical trials accurate reporting of usual care for people with stroke is scarce, thus understanding the control group compared to the experimental group is poor. The unit of measure in this study is therapy sessions, where a clinician is providing usual care to a patient.

The observed sessions will occur in two Austin Health settings: Acute at Austin Hospital; subacute, across Royal Talbot Rehabilitation Centre or the Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital. For each session, patient characteristics, dose and content of upper limb interventions will be electronically captured in REDCap. Additionally, the sessions will be video recorded to allow a second rater to assess feasibility. The secondary aim is to determine if there is an association between the dose and content of upper limb intervention sessions and the contextual factors of stroke patients. Two participant groups will be recruited: Stroke patients and Clinicians (Occupational Therapists and Allied Health Assistants).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a prospective observational cohort study to determine the feasibility of accurate, complete, and timely real-time electronic capturing of upper limb motor intervention sessions during usual care.

In clinical trials accurate reporting of usual care for people with stroke is scarce, thus understanding the control group compared to the experimental group is poor.

The unit of measure is the therapy sessions, where a clinician is providing usual care to a patient. The observed sessions will occur across two Austin Health settings. Setting A: Acute at Austin Hospital, and Setting B: Subacute at Royal Talbot Rehabilitation Centre or the Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital.

For each session, patient characteristics, the multiple dimensions of dose, and the content of usual care motor upper limb interventions will be electronically captured in REDCap. The observed sessions will be video recorded and a second rater will review the session for dose data accuracy. Secondary to determining feasibility, the dose and content data from observed sessions will be analysed to investigate the association of context factors such as setting and upper limb impairment severity.

As such, this study aims to answer the following research questions:

  • Is it feasible for clinicians to electronically capture accurate, complete, and timely upper limb motor intervention session dose during usual care of stroke patients?
  • Is there an association between dose and content of upper limb intervention sessions and the contextual factors of stroke patients?

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

146

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Group 1: Stroke patients These participants will be selected from inpatients within the tertiary health service of Austin Health in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. They may be located at the acute setting: Austin hospital, Or subacute setting: Heidelberg repatriation hospital or Royal Talbot rehabilitation Centre.

Group 2: Clinicians Clinicians will be invited to participate if they are an Occupational Therapist or allied health assistant working at Austin health with the stroke patient population.

Description

Group 1: Stroke patients

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (≥18 years) with a new, first or consecutive stroke, confirmed on CT or MRI.
  • Motor upper limb impairment defined by a Shoulder Abduction and Finger Extension (SAFE) score of 0 through 9.
  • Able to consent for themselves.
  • Likely to receive at least one upper limb intervention session as determined by the treating clinical team.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Existing co-morbidities that limit upper limb function and usual care treatment provided as determined by the treating clinical team e.g., neural or orthopeadic
  • Receiving palliative care or have a limited life expectancy
  • Deemed unable or unnecessary to participate in upper limb intervention by the treating clinical team
  • Treating Occupational Therapist and local allied health assistant declined to participate in the research preventing recording of usual care data
  • Unable to follow basic instructions in English

Group 2: Clinicians

Inclusion criteria

  • Occupational therapist or allied health assistant working with the stroke population in an acute or subacute settings within Austin Health.
  • At least four months of clinical experience

Exclusion criteria:

• Clinicians expected to move into another clinical area within one month.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Acute Sessions
Observed sessions for patients who are in the acute inpatient setting. Each session will include a patient and a clinician

During usual care sessions, clinicians will real-time capture information about the intervention session into REDCap. This information is related to the multi-dimensional dose articulation framework e.g., content of the session and difficulty of the task, session length, episode length, and number of repetitions.

The usual care motor upper limb intervention the patient receives is determined by the clinician providing the care. The therapy may include but is not limited to strength training, task specific retraining, constraint induced movement therapy, mirror box, and electrical stimulation.

Subacute Sessions
Observed sessions for patients who are in the subacute inpatient setting. Each session will include a patient and a clinician

During usual care sessions, clinicians will real-time capture information about the intervention session into REDCap. This information is related to the multi-dimensional dose articulation framework e.g., content of the session and difficulty of the task, session length, episode length, and number of repetitions.

The usual care motor upper limb intervention the patient receives is determined by the clinician providing the care. The therapy may include but is not limited to strength training, task specific retraining, constraint induced movement therapy, mirror box, and electrical stimulation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of real-time electronic data input of usual care session dose
Time Frame: Each feasibility session will take up to one hour.

A single binary composite primary outcome, where feasibility is defined by 90% of sessions achieving ALL of:

  1. Binary outcome of Accuracy: ≤10% difference in dose between electronic data and second-rater data from a video recording of the session as defined by the decision algorithm.
  2. Binary outcome of Completeness: ≥90% of the electronic data completed by clinicians as defined by the decision algorithm.
  3. Binary outcome of Timeliness: ≤10% of session time is spent completing the electronic record or rated non-burdensome by the clinician as defined by the decision algorithm.
Each feasibility session will take up to one hour.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kate Hayward, University of Melbourne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Real-time electronic data input into REDCap

Subscribe