ImpleMEntation of a Digital-first Care deLiverY Model for Heart Failure in Uganda (MEDLY Uganda)

May 18, 2026 updated by: Yale University

This is a stepped wedge, cluster-randomized study, that will implement a digital-first, multi-component strategy for Heart Failure (HF) to improve HF self-care at 6 Regional Referral Hospital (RRH) outpatient departments in Uganda. The investigators will evaluate both implementation and clinical outcomes using mixed methods. . First, investigators will assess the implementation and clinical effectiveness of an enhanced standard-of-care clinical bundle, and a digital health intervention to improve HF self-care in Uganda (Aim 1). To do this, the investigators will conduct a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial that includes a brief control period followed by a clinical care service bundle for HF (Core HF), followed by the introduction of the digital health application (Medly Uganda). The co-primary outcomes will be the Self-Care of HF Index (implementation) and the composite of mortality and HF hospitalization (clinical effectiveness).

To ensure standardized basic HF care which will augment self-care, investigators will train providers in an evidence-based HF clinical care service bundle (Core HF) including a care protocol (treatment algorithm for HF), self-care training for patients and providers, and medication stock management prior to the introduction of the digital health intervention (Medly Uganda). Medly Uganda will utilize a patient-facing mobile health application designed to improve self-care among patients with HF. Its principal components are: 1) a patient-facing mobile application that processes patient-reported symptoms and generates algorithm-driven messages to guide self-care and symptom management and 2) a clinician-facing internet dashboard that monitors symptom reports and facilitates nurse-guided management recommendations and physician backup support. The project supports an integrated, digital interface at participating hospitals to monitor and intervene with patients using the mobile health application.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In parallel to the above, the investigators will conduct a mixed methods process evaluation to inform iterative adjustments to the implementation processes, i.e., a Learn- As-You-Go design by reviewing qualitative feedback and quantitative intervention data (Aim 2). Then, cost effectiveness, and sustainability factors for Medly Uganda, including an examination of cost, cost-effectiveness, and equity of Medly Uganda from a financial and societal perspective will be explored (Aim 3).

The focus of this registration will be Aim 1 and Aim 2.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

576

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Arua, Uganda
        • Arua Regional Referral Hospital
      • Fort Portal, Uganda
        • Fort Portal Regional Referral Hospital
      • Kampala, Uganda
        • Uganda Heart Institute
      • Lira, Uganda
        • Lira Regional Referral Hospital
      • Masaka, Uganda
        • Masaka Regional Referral Hospital
      • Mbale, Uganda
        • Mbale Regional Referral Hospital
      • Mbarara, Uganda
        • Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-III HF
  • Access to a mobile phone
  • Basic reading skills in 1 of the offered languages, as determined by their clinical care provider. Languages will include: Lugbara in Arua, Lugiso in Mbale, Runyankole in Mbarara, Luganda in Masaka, Rutooro in Fort Portal, and Langi in Lira in addition to English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any individual not meeting the above inclusion criteria
  • Inability to provide informed consent, as determined by the nurse manager
  • Active medical condition requiring hospitalization, such as cardiac ischemia (acute electrocardiographic changes and/or positive biomarkers, if available), syncope, or significant fluid overload
  • Echocardiography findings that do not support a diagnosis of HF as determined during a study visit. This exclusion might occur following enrollment and new patients may be consented and enrolled to compensate for these exclusions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Step 1. Core HF intervention period
All sites will be trained in an evidence-based clinical care bundle for HF, to ensure standardized basic HF care across the participating RRHs in the study. For this service bundle which will augment self-care (Core-HF), the investigators will train providers in an evidence-based HF clinical care service bundle including a care protocol (treatment algorithm for HF), self-care training for patients and providers, and medication stock management prior to introducing the digital health intervention (Medly Uganda, described in Arm 2).
All clinical care providers involved in HF care at participating RRHs will be trained in a HF service bundle including a care protocol (treatment algorithm based on global guidelines), self-care training for patients and providers, and medication stock management to ensure supply of HF medications to patients in need.
Experimental: Step 2. Core-HF plus Medly Uganda digital health intervention
Medly Uganda will utilize a patient-facing mobile health application designed to improve self-care among patients with HF. Its principal components are: 1) a patient-facing mobile application that processes patient-reported symptoms and generates algorithm-driven messages to guide self-care and symptom management and 2) a clinician- facing internet dashboard that monitors symptom reports and facilitates nurse-guided management recommendations and physician backup support. The project will support an integrated, digital interface at participating hospitals to monitor and intervene with patients who are using the mobile health application.
A patient-facing mobile health application designed to improve self-care will be provided to the study participant, which will operate on all mobile devices. This will be introduced after the Core-HF intervention has been delivered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI)
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months and 36 months
The SCHFI v7.23 is a validated 39-item instrument hat assesses maintenance, management, and self-confidence of heart failure self-care. Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating improved self care.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months and 36 months
Clinical Effectiveness
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months and 36 months
A composite of the number of participants with mortality and HF hospitalization will be used to assess clinical effectiveness. This outcome is the most widely used composite clinical endpoint in HF trials globally.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months and 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in 6-minute walk test
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months and 36 months
The 6-minute walk test monitors physical conditioning. It measures the distance an individual can walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The individual can self-pace and rest as needed as they walk back and forth along a marked course. The participant can use an assistive walking device they normally use, such as a cane. The minimum clinically important difference in 6-minute walk distance is approximately 30 meters, a difference that is associated with mortality.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months and 36 months
Change in Pro-NT Brain Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-NT BNP)
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months and 36 months
Levels of Pro-NT BNP, a widely used prognostic marker in HF, will be measured in blood samples in pg/mL. Lower values indicate a positive outcome.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months and 36 months
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months and 36 months
The KCCQ is a 12-item questionnaire that measures symptoms, physical and social limitations, and quality of life in participants with heart failure. KCCQ scores are scaled from 0 to 100, where scores represent health status as follows: 0 to 24: very poor to poor; 25 to 49: poor to fair; 50 to 74: fair to good; and 75 to 100: good to excellent.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months and 36 months
Change in EuroQol -5D (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months and 36 months
EQ-5D 5L is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life. It is comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Higher scores indicated greater levels of problems across each of the five dimensions. A utility score was obtained by using a weighted combination of the levels of the five dimension-scales.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months and 36 months
Change in NYHF Classification
Time Frame: up to 36 months
As assessed by clinical care provider, heart failure as measured by the New York Heart Failure Classification 1. Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc. 2. Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. 3. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances. Comfortable only at rest, and 4.Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients. Lower classes indicate a positive outcome.
up to 36 months
Facility fidelity to implementation strategy assessed by vital sign checks and other intervention components
Time Frame: up to 36 months
Percentage of patients receiving Core HF components (i.e., vital sign checks; self-care guidance) based on the penultimate implementation strategy
up to 36 months
Facility fidelity to implementation strategy assessed by the availability of medications
Time Frame: up to 36 months
Facility fidelity to implementation strategy will be assessed by the prescribing-to-dispensing ratio of HF medications at facility pharmacy
up to 36 months
Participant fidelity to self-care assessed by medication adherence using Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) and 7-day recall
Time Frame: up to 36 months
Participant fidelity will be assessed by self report administered by the Research Assistant. The MARS-5 is a 5-item questionnaire that asks the frequency of behaviors that indicate non-adherence (forgetting to take medications, for example). The range of score is 5-25. A higher score indicates higher adherence (positive outcome of self-care).
up to 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeremy Schwartz, MD, Yale University
  • Principal Investigator: Isaac Ssinabulya, MD, Uganda Initiative for Integrated Management of Non-Communicable Diseases (UINCD)
  • Principal Investigator: Joseph Cafazzo, PhD, University Health Network of Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2000035428
  • R01HL166585 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Enhanced HF Clinical Care (Core-HF)

Subscribe