- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05968625
3D-Printed Vs Thermoformed Retainers: Comparison of Post-Treatment Stability, Changes in Mechanical Properties and Patients' OHRQoL
Post-Treatment Stability, Changes in Mechanical Properties and Patients' OHRQoL Of Direct 3D-Printed Retainers Versus Thermoformed Retainers: An Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial
Following completion of orthodontic treatment, prolonged retention with either part-time or full-time wear of retainers is crucial in preventing relapse. Clear thermoformed retainers (TFR) are easy to fabricate and popular among orthodontic patients. With the advent of digital orthodontics and the development of biocompatible photopolymerizable resin, it is now possible to fabricate direct 3D-printed retainers.
The aim of this study is to determine and compare the post-treatment stability of dentition, changes in thickness and mechanical properties of the retainers, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients wearing direct 3D-printed retainers and conventional thermoformed retainers over a retention period of 6 months.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Primary Objective:
1. To determine and compare the post-treatment stability for direct 3D printed retainers (3DPR) and conventional TFR (TFR) at baseline (T0), 3 months (T1) and 6 months (T2).
Secondary Objectives:
- To determine and compare the thickness and mechanical properties for 3DPR and TFR after 6 months of usage.
- To determine and compare the OHRQoL of patients wearing 3DPR and TFR at T0, T1 and T2.
Sample size calculation:
Sample size calculation is based on the study done by Kumar & Bansal (2011) which compared the effectiveness of two different removable retainers on stability. With an effect size of 1.127, α = 0.05, and power = 0.80. Using G*Power version 3.1.9.7 software, the total number of samples is n = 22 (11 subject per group). This number is increased by 30% to account for the dropout rate to produce the final sample size, n = 30 (15 subjects per group).
Methodology:
Subjects who have completed their orthodontic treatment (fulfil the inclusion and exclusion criteria) and are ready for debond, will be invited to participate in the research and consecutively recruited, between April 2023 until September 2023, in the Postgraduate Orthodontic Clinic, Dental Specialists and Research Tower, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia. Patient information sheets and consent forms will be issued to the subjects that fulfil the criteria. Only consented respondents will be recruited.
All 30 subjects will be randomly allocated (simple randomization with 1:1 allocation) to either the TFR group or the 3DPR group by using number generated list provided by www.random.org . The randomization will be performed by the main supervisor, who is not involve in the treatment, data collection and data analysis of the research. The operator will be concealed from the group allocation. The allocation will be revealed to the operator on the day of debond appointment with a opaque white envelope.
All the subjects will undergo the same standard debond process. and receive a post debond thermoformed retainers within 24 hours which they are required to part-time for every night (8-12 hours).
The subjects will be reviewed after 1 week (T0) for scanning of teeth with Trios 3 intraoral scanner. The interventional retainers (TFR or 3DPR) will be issued after 2 weeks. The subjects are instructed to wear the retainers part-time (8-12 hours) for every nights. A pamphlet that contains detailed information on the care of retainers will also be provided to every subject. All the subjects will be reviewed after 3 months (T1) and at 6 months (T2) after wearing the interventional retainers.
The primary outcome is to assess the post-treatment stability after part time wear of the retainers for a period of 6 months. The subject's upper and lower dentition will be scanned by using intraoral scanner at T0, T1, and T2. The measurements will be performed digitally using 3Shape orthodontic analyzer software. Overjet, overbite, intermolar width, and little irregularity index will be measured.
OHIP-14 questionnaire will be given to the participants to answer during T0, T1 and T2. All the retainers will be retrieved at T2 to undergo mechanical test.
Statistical Analysis:
The data collected will be entered into SPSS software (version 26.0). i. Chi-square tests will be used to compare baseline characteristics between the 2 groups.
ii. Repeated measures ANOVA or paired t-test will be used to determine the mean differences in post treatment stability, thickness of retainers, mechanical properties of retainers and OHIP-14 scores at different time intervals. The p-value will be set to less than 0.05.
iii. Two samples independent t test will be used to compare the post-treatment stability, changes in thickness, mechanical properties, and OHIP-14 scores between TFR and 3DPR group. The p-value will be set to less than 0.05.
iv. Shapiro-Wilk tests will be referred, and non-parametric tests will be performed for skewed data.
Data will be analyzed following the intention-to-treat analysis.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Dr. Boo Hui Shan
- Phone Number: +60102705306
- Email: 17080312@siswa.um.edu.my
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Associate Professor Dr. Saritha Sivarajan
- Phone Number: 4562 +6037967 4802
- Email: saritha@um.edu.my
Study Locations
-
-
Wilayah Persekutuan
-
Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia, 50603
- Recruiting
- Orthodontic Postgraduate Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya.
-
Contact:
- Dr. Boo Hui Shan
- Phone Number: +60102705306
- Email: 17080312@siswa.um.edu.my
-
Contact:
- Associate Professor Dr. Saritha Sivarajan
- Phone Number: 4562 +60379674802
- Email: saritha@um.edu.my
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fixed appliance treatment in both arches and indicated for VFR in the retention phase as part of their original treatment plan.
- No intention to relocate within the study period; able to attend the three-monthly review appointments for half a year.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Single-arch or sectional fixed appliances.
- Space dentition.
- Hypodontia requiring tooth replacement on the retainer as a temporary measure.
- Previous treatment with maxillary expansion.
- Indicated for fixed retainer or double retention regime (such as VFRs fitted over fixed retainers).
- Premature debond from the original fixed appliances course.
- Cleft lip and/or palate; or orthognathic cases.
- Learning difficulties and inability to read written instructions/ questionnaire in English or Malay
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Thermoformed retainers (TFR)
Thermoformed retainers are constructed from an Erkodur blank (ERKODENT® Erich Kopp GmbH, Pfalzgrafenweiler, Germany) with 1.0 mm in thickness, following the manufacturer's instructions.
|
conventional thermoformed retainers fabricated on stone models.
|
|
Experimental: Direct 3-D printed retainers (3DPR)
Private dental laboratories directly print the retainers using a NextDent 3D printer and NextDent ortho Flex resin.
Thickness of 0.80mm
|
3D-printed retainers fabricated directly by DLP printer.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-treatment stability
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The subject's upper and lower dentition will be scanned by using intraoral scanner at T0, T1, and T2.
The measurements will be performed digitally using 3Shape orthodontic Analyzer software (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Measurements: Overjet (mm), Overbite (mm), Intermolar width (mm), and little irregularity index (mm).
All the measurements are in millimetres.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in thickness of retainers
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Measurements of changes in thickness (mm) will be performed by the principal investigator by using an electronic digital thickness gauge with a resolution of 0.01 mm and accuracy of ±0.02 mm, which will be calibrated before each use.
|
6 months
|
|
Changes in hardness of retainers
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The extra sets of retainers (5 sets from each group) at T0 and the retrieved retainers (5 sets from each group) at T2 of each group will be tested.
The hardness that will be determined is Vickers hardness in Megapascal (MPa).
A universal hardness testing machine (DUH-211S, Shimadzu, Kyoto Japan) will be used to determine the hardness.
|
6 months
|
|
Oral Health Impact Profile -14 (OHIP-14)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
This research will use the validated Modified short version of the OHIP-14 for Malaysian adults with questions that are relevant to subjects wearing removable retainers.
Responses to each item will be scored on a five-point Likert scale measuring from never (score 0) to very often (score 4).
The OHIP-14 questionnaire will be given to the participants to answer during T0, T1 and T2.
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Associate Professor Dr. Saritha Sivarajan, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Al-Moghrabi D, Salazar FC, Pandis N, Fleming PS. Compliance with removable orthodontic appliances and adjuncts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jul;152(1):17-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.019.
- Thickett E, Power S. A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear. Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb;32(1):1-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp061. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
- Kumar AG, Bansal A. Effectiveness and acceptability of Essix and Begg retainers: a prospective study. Aust Orthod J. 2011 May;27(1):52-6.
- Rowland H, Hichens L, Williams A, Hills D, Killingback N, Ewings P, Clark S, Ireland AJ, Sandy JR. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Dec;132(6):730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.06.019.
- Saub R, Locker D, Allison P. Derivation and validation of the short version of the Malaysian Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;33(5):378-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00242.x.
- Williams A, Bencharit S, Yang IH, Stilianoudakis SC, Carrico CK, Tufekci E. Effect of print angulation on the accuracy and precision of 3D-printed orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Jan;161(1):133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.01.020.
- Naeem OA, Bencharit S, Yang IH, Stilianoudakis SC, Carrico C, Tufekci E. Comparison of 3-dimensional printing technologies on the precision, trueness, and accuracy of printed retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Apr;161(4):582-591. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.03.016.
- Kessler A, Hickel R, Reymus M. 3D Printing in Dentistry-State of the Art. Oper Dent. 2020 Jan/Feb;45(1):30-40. doi: 10.2341/18-229-L. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
- Jindal P, Juneja M, Siena FL, Bajaj D, Breedon P. Mechanical and geometric properties of thermoformed and 3D printed clear dental aligners. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Nov;156(5):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.012.
- Etemad-Shahidi Y, Qallandar OB, Evenden J, Alifui-Segbaya F, Ahmed KE. Accuracy of 3-Dimensionally Printed Full-Arch Dental Models: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 20;9(10):3357. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103357.
- Cousley RR. Introducing 3D printing in your orthodontic practice. J Orthod. 2020 Sep;47(3):265-272. doi: 10.1177/1465312520936704. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
- Cole D, Bencharit S, Carrico CK, Arias A, Tufekci E. Evaluation of fit for 3D-printed retainers compared with thermoform retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Apr;155(4):592-599. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.09.011.
- Can E, Panayi N, Polychronis G, Papageorgiou SN, Zinelis S, Eliades G, Eliades T. In-house 3D-printed aligners: effect of in vivo ageing on mechanical properties. Eur J Orthod. 2022 Jan 25;44(1):51-55. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjab022.
- Al-Moghrabi D, Littlewood SJ, Fleming PS. Orthodontic retention protocols: an evidence-based overview. Br Dent J. 2021 Jun;230(11):770-776. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-2954-7. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
- Mohd Tahir N, Wan Hassan WN, Saub R. Comparing retainers constructed on conventional stone models and on 3D printed models: a randomized crossover clinical study. Eur J Orthod. 2019 Aug 8;41(4):370-380. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy063.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- UNIVERSITI MALAYA
- UMG013E-2023 (Other Grant/Funding Number: UNIVERSITY GRANT, UNIVERSITI MALAYA)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Orthodontic Retention
-
Noor Sattar RaheemRecruitingOrthodontic Relapse | Orthodontic Retention ApplianceIraq
-
Essraa hassan Hussein MohamedNot yet recruitingOrthodontic Retention Appliance | Clear Orthodontic RetainersEgypt
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompleted
-
University of AthensCompletedOrthodontic Retention ComplianceGreece
-
Nantes University HospitalCompleted
-
Piotr FudalejActive, not recruitingOrthodontic Retention
-
Queen Mary University of LondonCompletedRetention | Compliance | Periodontal Health | OrthodonticUnited Kingdom
-
Alexandria UniversityCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingOrthodontic Relapse | Orthodontic Retainer | Fixed Orthodontic Retainer | Essix Retainer | Vacuum-formed Retainer | Dual Retention ProtocolEgypt
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Thermoformed retainers
-
Nourhan M.AlyCompleted
-
University of PaviaCompletedOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationItaly
-
Essraa hassan Hussein MohamedNot yet recruitingOrthodontic Retention Appliance | Clear Orthodontic RetainersEgypt
-
Sydney Local Health DistrictActive, not recruitingClass III Malocclusion | UnderbiteAustralia
-
University of L'AquilaCompleted
-
Dow University of Health SciencesCompleted
-
University of MalayaRecruitingOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationMalaysia
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingLower Anterior CrowdingEgypt
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridRecruitingCrowding, Tooth | Malocclusion, Angle's Class | Rotation of Tooth | Tipped Tooth or TeethSpain
-
University of BaghdadEnrolling by invitationRotation | Crowded Teeth | Class I Malocclusion | Spacing of Anterior TeethIraq