- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07280455
Effectiveness of Gold Fixed Retainers Compared to Conventional Stainless Steel Retainers
The Effectiveness of Gold Fixed Retainers Compared to Conventional Stainless Steel Retainers: A Randomized Clinical Trial
This randomized clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of a gold-plated multistranded mandibular fixed retainer versus a conventional multistranded stainless-steel fixed retainer in maintaining lower anterior tooth alignment after completion of orthodontic treatment. Eligible participants (post-orthodontic patients requiring mandibular fixed retention) will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a gold-plated 0.0195-inch multistranded retainer or an identical-gauge 0.0195-inch stainless-steel multistranded retainer. Participants will be followed for 6 months.
The primary outcome is post-treatment stability of mandibular anterior alignment, assessed by changes in Little's Irregularity Index over time, along with retainer failure outcomes (e.g., time to first failure and tooth-level failure events). Secondary outcomes include periodontal health indices and related clinical measures collected at baseline and follow-up visits.
For the microbiological assessment, plaque/biofilm will be collected from the retainer using sterile swabs at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months to evaluate bacterial levels associated with each retainer material.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: NOOR Raheem, BDS
- Phone Number: +9647704514927
- Email: Noor.sattar2403@codental.uobaghdad.edu.iq
Study Locations
-
-
Baghdad Governorate
-
Baghdad, Baghdad Governorate, Iraq
- Recruiting
- College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad - Orthodontic Clinics
-
Contact:
- NOOR Raheem, BDS
- Phone Number: +9647704514927
- Email: Noor.sattar2403@codental.uobaghdad.edu.iq
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age: 15-30 years.
- Patients who have completed comprehensive orthodontic treatment ,with well-aligned mandibular anterior teeth (Little's Irregularity Index ≤ 0.5 mm) at debond; both extraction and non-extraction cases are eligible.
- Patients with good oral hygiene and healthy periodontium at baseline; no previous bonded retainer.
- All mandibular anterior teeth present (canine-canine), with sound lingual enamel suitable for bonding.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a history of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) or surgically assisted RME (SARME).
- Patients with a cleft lip / and or palate (craniofacial anomalies).
- Patients with marked deep overbite and/or parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism, clenching).
- Patients with conditions precluding reliable bonding in the mandibular anterior segment (active caries, extensive restorations, enamel fractures) or missing teeth from canine to canine.
- Patients with medical/periodontal conditions likely to affect gingival health (e.g., active periodontitis, uncontrolled systemic disease).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Gold-coated fixed retainer wire
Participants will receive a mandibular canine-to-canine fixed retainer fabricated and bonded using the standardized protocol.
The allocated device is a 0.0195-inch gold-plated multistranded wire (penta twist, five-strand).
|
Participants will receive a bonded mandibular fixed retainer extending canine-to-canine.
The retainer will be fabricated using a gold-coated retainer wire and bonded to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular anterior teeth using standard orthodontic bonding procedures.
After placement, participants will be followed at scheduled visits (baseline and follow-ups at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months) to evaluate clinical stability and retainer performance.
At each follow-up visit, the retainer will be clinically examined for integrity, and any failure/complication events will be recorded (e.g., debonding/loosening, fracture, or need for repair).
Clinical outcome assessments will include mandibular anterior alignment/stability (Little's Irregularity Index), periodontal indices, and occlusal assessment, Microbiological sampling will consist of plaque/swab samples collected at each follow-up visit.
|
|
Active Comparator: Stainless steel fixed retainer wire
Participants will receive a mandibular canine-to-canine fixed retainer fabricated and bonded using the standardized protocol.
The allocated device is a 0.0195-inch dead-soft multistranded stainless-steel wire (coaxial, six-strand).
|
Participants will receive a bonded mandibular fixed retainer extending canine-to-canine.
The retainer will be fabricated using a conventional stainless steel retainer wire and bonded to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular anterior teeth using standard orthodontic bonding procedures.
After placement, participants will be followed at scheduled visits (baseline and follow-ups at, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months) to evaluate clinical stability and retainer performance.
At each follow-up visit, the retainer will be clinically examined for integrity, and any failure/complication events will be recorded (e.g., debonding/loosening, fracture, or need for repair).
Clinical outcome assessments will include mandibular anterior alignment/stability (Little's Irregularity Index), periodontal indices, and occlusal assessment.
Microbiological sampling will consist of plaque/swab samples collected at each follow-up visit.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in mandibular incisor alignment (Little's Irregularity Index, ΔLII)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) to 6 months after retainer placement (assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
Little's Irregularity Index (LII) is a quantitative scale of mandibular anterior alignment, calculated as the sum of the linear displacements (in mm) of the contact points of the six mandibular anterior teeth. Scores range from 0 mm (perfect alignment, no irregularity) to ≥10 mm (very severe irregularity); higher scores indicate greater crowding and therefore a worse outcome. LII will be measured for the mandibular anterior teeth (canine-to-canine) at baseline (T0, before fixed-retainer placement) and at follow-up visits (T1 = 1 month, T2 = 3 months, T3 = 6 months). The primary endpoint is the change in LII (follow-up LII minus baseline LII), comparing gold-plated versus stainless-steel fixed-retainer groups. |
Baseline (T0) to 6 months after retainer placement (assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
|
Time to first fixed-retainer failure (survival)
Time Frame: From retainer placement to 6 months after placement.
|
Time (days) from fixed retainer bonding to the first failure event requiring repair/rebonding/replacement.
Failures will be recorded and classified (e.g., adhesive-enamel debond, wire-composite debond, wire fracture, partial/complete loosening) and compared between groups.
|
From retainer placement to 6 months after placement.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Plaque accumulation at mandibular anterior teeth (Silness-Löe Plaque Index)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months.
|
Silness-Löe Plaque Index is a 4-point scale (0-3) that scores plaque accumulation on tooth surfaces adjacent to the gingival margin.
Scores range from 0 (no plaque) to 3 (abundant soft deposits); higher scores indicate poorer oral hygiene and a worse periodontal condition.
The mean Plaque Index will be recorded for the mandibular anterior teeth adjacent to the fixed retainer at baseline (T0, before retainer placement) and at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after retainer placement, and compared between the gold-plated and stainless-steel fixed-retainer groups.
|
Baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months.
|
|
Microbiological plaque outcome
Time Frame: Follow-up visits at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after retainer placement.
|
Biofilm will be collected using a sterile swab moved along interdental spaces over the exposed retainer, then placed in transport medium and sent for cultivation.
After incubation on agar, the total number of bacterial colonies (colony-forming units, CFU) will be counted for each sample.
Higher CFU counts indicate greater plaque accumulation and a worse periodontal outcome.
Samples will be collected at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after retainer placement and compared between the gold-plated and stainless-steel fixed-retainer groups.
|
Follow-up visits at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after retainer placement.
|
|
Change in mandibular inter-canine width
Time Frame: Baseline (T0, before retainer placement) and follow-up visits at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3).
|
Mandibular inter-canine width (mm) will be measured on study casts/impressions as the linear distance between the cusp tips of the right and left mandibular canines.
Measurements will be taken at baseline (T0, before fixed-retainer placement) and at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after retainer placement.
The outcome is the change in inter-canine width from baseline at each follow-up visit; larger absolute changes indicate greater relapse and worse post-treatment occlusal stability.
Changes will be compared between the gold-plated and stainless-steel fixed-retainer groups.
|
Baseline (T0, before retainer placement) and follow-up visits at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3).
|
|
Gingival inflammation at mandibular anterior teeth (Löe-Silness Gingival Index)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after retainer placement.
|
Gingival condition will be assessed using the Löe-Silness Gingival Index, a 4-point scale (0-3) where 0 = normal gingiva, 1 = mild inflammation, 2 = moderate inflammation, and 3 = severe inflammation with ulceration and/or spontaneous bleeding.
Higher scores indicate more severe gingival inflammation and a worse periodontal outcome.
The mean Gingival Index will be recorded for the mandibular anterior teeth adjacent to the fixed retainer at baseline (T0) and at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after retainer placement, and compared between the two retainer groups.
|
Baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after retainer placement.
|
|
Probing pocket depth at mandibular anterior teeth
Time Frame: Baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after retainer placement.
|
Probing pocket depth (PPD) in millimeters will be measured at specified sites around the mandibular anterior teeth using a calibrated periodontal probe.
Higher values indicate deeper pockets and a worse periodontal outcome.
Mean PPD will be calculated for the mandibular anterior region at baseline (T0) and at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after retainer placement, and compared between the two fixed-retainer groups.
|
Baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after retainer placement.
|
|
Change in mandibular arch length
Time Frame: Baseline (T0, before retainer placement) and 1, 3, and 6 months (T1, T2, T3) after retainer placement.
|
Mandibular arch length (mm) will be measured on study casts as the linear distance from the mesial surface of the right mandibular first permanent molar to the mesial surface of the left mandibular first permanent molar, parallel to the occlusal plane.
Measurements will be taken at baseline (T0, before fixed-retainer placement) and at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after retainer placement.
The outcome is the change in arch length from baseline at each follow-up visit; larger absolute changes indicate greater relapse and worse post-treatment occlusal stability.
Changes will be compared between the gold-plated and stainless-steel fixed-retainer groups.
|
Baseline (T0, before retainer placement) and 1, 3, and 6 months (T1, T2, T3) after retainer placement.
|
|
Change in overjet
Time Frame: Baseline (T0, before retainer placement) and 1, 3, and 6 months (T1, T2, T3) after retainer placement.
|
Overjet (mm) will be measured as the horizontal distance between the labial surface of the most prominent mandibular incisor and the palatal surface of the corresponding maxillary incisor, measured on study casts and/or intraoral records.
Measurements will be taken at baseline (T0, before fixed-retainer placement) and at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after retainer placement.
The outcome is the change in overjet from baseline at each follow-up visit; larger absolute changes indicate greater relapse and worse post-treatment occlusal stability.
Changes will be compared between the gold-plated and stainless-steel fixed-retainer groups.
|
Baseline (T0, before retainer placement) and 1, 3, and 6 months (T1, T2, T3) after retainer placement.
|
|
Change in overbite
Time Frame: Baseline (T0, before retainer placement) and 1, 3, and 6 months (T1, T2, T3) after retainer placement.
|
Overbite (mm) will be measured as the vertical overlap of the maxillary incisors over the mandibular incisors, using study casts and/or intraoral records.
Measurements will be taken at baseline (T0, before fixed-retainer placement) and at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after retainer placement.
The outcome is the change in overbite from baseline at each follow-up visit; larger absolute changes indicate greater relapse and worse post-treatment occlusal stability.
Changes will be compared between the gold-plated and stainless-steel fixed-retainer groups.
|
Baseline (T0, before retainer placement) and 1, 3, and 6 months (T1, T2, T3) after retainer placement.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: NOOR NOOR, BDS, noor sattar
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- UOB-RCT-ORTHO-GOLDSS-2025
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Orthodontic Relapse
-
University of Roma La SapienzaCompletedOrthodontic Relapse | Orthodontic Appliances | Orthodontic ApplianceItaly
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingOrthodontic Relapse | Orthodontic Retainer | Fixed Orthodontic Retainer | Essix Retainer | Vacuum-formed Retainer | Dual Retention ProtocolEgypt
-
Poliklinika OrthonovaUniversity of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; University...RecruitingOrthodontic RelapseCroatia
-
Sydney Local Health DistrictActive, not recruiting
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamWithdrawnOrthodontics | Orthodontic Appliance
-
University of AthensActive, not recruitingRelapse | Orthodontic RetentionGreece
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedOrthodontic Patient Experience | Orthodontic | Orthodontic Aligners | Orthodontic Pain (D013850)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
King Abdulaziz UniversityRecruitingOrthodontic Appliance Complication | Orthodontic Appliance Design | Orthodontic TreatmentSaudi Arabia
-
University of BaghdadNot yet recruitingOrthodontic Brackets | Orthodontic Pathological Resorption of External Root | Orthodontic Pain | Orthodentic AppliancesIraq
-
Essraa hassan Hussein MohamedNot yet recruitingOrthodontic Retention Appliance | Clear Orthodontic RetainersEgypt
Clinical Trials on Gold-coated fixed retainer wire
-
Piotr FudalejActive, not recruitingOrthodontic Retention
-
Raghda AlaaActive, not recruiting
-
University of MalayaUnknownBimaxillary ProclinationMalaysia
-
Shiraz University of Medical SciencesShiraz Dental School, Orthodontic Research CenterUnknownHealth of PeriodontiumIran, Islamic Republic of
-
University of AthensActive, not recruitingRelapse | Orthodontic RetentionGreece
-
Mariam AlaaActive, not recruiting
-
Poliklinika OrthonovaUniversity of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; University...RecruitingOrthodontic RelapseCroatia
-
Amany IbrahimCompleted
-
King Abdulaziz UniversityRecruitingOrthodontic Appliance Complication | Orthodontic Appliance Design | Orthodontic TreatmentSaudi Arabia
-
Region GävleborgUmeå UniversityCompletedOrthodontics | Retention