- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05982028
Patients' Quality of Life After Pilonidal Cyst Operations.
Evaluation of Patients' Quality of Life and Treatment Outcomes After Pilonidal Cyst Operations.
Biomedical research consists of two main parts. In the first part, the pilonidal cyst-specific quality of life questionnaire is compiled, adapted, validated, tested for suitability in assessing patients after pilonidal cyst operations.
The second part will compare two pilonidal cyst operations. A prospective, comparative, randomized clinical study will be conducted.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The first part includes the creation, adaptation, validity and suitability of the pilonidal cyst-specific quality of life questionnaire in assessing patients after pilonidal cyst operations, verification and evaluation of the quality of life and its dynamics after these operations. A survey of patients operated on for acute and chronic pilonidal cysts will be conducted. The main evaluation criteria of the first part will be the internal consistency of the questionnaire, the stability of the measurements, the construct validity and the frequency of patients with moderate and severe symptoms according to the specific quality of life questionnaire after pilonidal cyst surgery and the SF36v2 quality of life questionnaire.
The second part will compare two pilonidal cyst operations. A prospective, comparative, randomized clinical study will be conducted. This part of the study will study patients scheduled for surgery for chronic pilonidal cyst. Patients will be randomized into two groups, a group that will undergo radical excision of the pilonidal cyst without suturing the wound and a group that will undergo minimally invasive "pit picking" surgery. Patients will be interviewed before surgery, as well as on the first and second day after surgery. Discharged patients will complete quality-of-life questionnaires at 1, 2 weeks, and 2 months. Patients will be invited for a visit after 1 and 6 months, wound healing, disease recurrence and quality of life will be evaluated. The main evaluation criteria of the second part will be objective data - postoperative complications, wound healing time, duration of incapacity for work, frequency of disease recurrence and subjective data - changes in pain (VAS 10 cm scale) and quality of life total points according to SF36v2 and the specific life questionnaire created after radical pilonidal cyst excision and "pit picking" operations.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kaunas, Lithuania, LT-47144
- Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Clinic of General Surgery
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18-75 (men and women)
- Chronic symptomatic (primary or recurrent) pilonidal cyst
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to III
- Signed the person's information and consent form to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Acute pilonidal cyst
- Patients who do not speak Lithuanian
- Cognitive, visual, auditory and locomotor system disorders
- Insufficiency of kidneys, liver, cardiopulmonary system
- Refuses to participate in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Pit picking group
Minimally invasive pilonidal cyst surgery.
|
Midline pits and secondary fistula openings were probed to determine the direction and length of any associated sinus tracts, followed by an excision with a 3 or 5 mm punch biopsy needle, depending on the size of the pit.
A 2 cm lateral incision was made parallel to the pilonidal cyst.
Hair and granulations within the sinus tracts were removed, and the cyst cavity was drained through the incision.
Nonabsorbable monofilament sutures were used to close the excisional wounds of the pits and secondary fistula.
Once haemostasis was achieved, the wound was covered with a sterile gauze with 10 % povidone-iodine solution.
|
|
Experimental: Excision group
Radical surgical pilonidal cyst excision without suturing
|
Under the guidance of brilliant green, the cavity of the pilonidal cyst, along with the sinus tracts and fistulas, was marked.
A symmetric elliptical incision was made to excise the pits and secondary fistula openings.
The pilonidal cyst was removed from the healthy subcutaneous tissue and sacrococcygeal fascia using monopolar electrocautery.
The wound was not sutured and was left open to heal by secondary intention.
After haemostasis was achieved, the wound was covered with sterile gauze with 10 % povidone-iodine solution.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain after surgery
Time Frame: One week after surgery
|
Postoperative pain will be assessed on a VAS 100 mm scale.
Patients will mark their pain at rest on a specified 100 mm scale at the specified time.
|
One week after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of disease recurrence
Time Frame: Recurrence will be assessed 6 months and 2 years after surgery
|
Disease recurrence will be assessed by clinical examination.
|
Recurrence will be assessed 6 months and 2 years after surgery
|
|
Pain after surgery
Time Frame: One day after surgery
|
Postoperative pain will be assessed on a VAS 100 mm scale.
Patients will mark their pain
|
One day after surgery
|
|
Pain after surgery
Time Frame: Two days after surgery
|
Postoperative pain will be assessed on a VAS 100 mm scale.
Patients will mark their pain
|
Two days after surgery
|
|
Pain after surgery
Time Frame: Two weeks after surgery
|
Postoperative pain will be assessed on a VAS 100 mm scale.
Patients will mark their pain
|
Two weeks after surgery
|
|
Pain after surgery
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Postoperative pain will be assessed on a VAS 100 mm scale.
Patients will mark their pain
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Pain after surgery
Time Frame: Two months after surgery
|
Postoperative pain will be assessed on a VAS 100 mm scale.
Patients will mark their pain
|
Two months after surgery
|
|
Pain after surgery
Time Frame: Six months after surgery
|
Postoperative pain will be assessed on a VAS 100 mm scale.
Patients will mark their pain
|
Six months after surgery
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: 1 months after surgery
|
Patients will report past complications.
|
1 months after surgery
|
|
Quality of life according to the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36).
Time Frame: Before surgery, 1 and 2 days after surgery, 1 and 2 weeks after surgery, 1, 2 and 6 months after surgery. Change from baseline in quality of life scores over a 6-month period will be assessed.
|
Patients fill out the the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36).
All questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning possible.
Aggregate scores are compiled as a percentage of the total points possible, using the RAND scoring table.
The scores from those questions that address each specific area of functional health status are then averaged together, for a final score within each of the 8 dimensions measured (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/ fatigue, emotional well being, social functioning, pain, general health).
All 8 categories are scored in the same way.
|
Before surgery, 1 and 2 days after surgery, 1 and 2 weeks after surgery, 1, 2 and 6 months after surgery. Change from baseline in quality of life scores over a 6-month period will be assessed.
|
|
Duration of disability
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
Patients will note the duration of incapacity for work.
|
1 month after surgery
|
|
Wound healing time
Time Frame: Six months after surgery
|
Patients will note the time when the wound healed.
|
Six months after surgery
|
|
Quality of life total scores according to a specific life questionnaire developed by the researcher.
Time Frame: Before surgery, 1 and 2 days after surgery, 1 and 2 weeks after surgery, 1, 2 and 6 months after surgery. Change from baseline in quality of life scores over a 6-month period will be assessed.
|
Patients fill out a specific life questionnaire.
This questionnaire consists of 20 questions, the value of each question is from 1 to 5 points.
The minimum score value is 20, the maximum score value is 100.
A lower score value indicates a better quality of life.
|
Before surgery, 1 and 2 days after surgery, 1 and 2 weeks after surgery, 1, 2 and 6 months after surgery. Change from baseline in quality of life scores over a 6-month period will be assessed.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PC1 - 4
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgRecruitingQuality of Life | Postoperative Quality of Recovery | Health-Related Quality-of-LifeBelgium
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaCompletedImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
Children's National Research InstituteCompletedProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Linkoeping UniversityRecruiting
-
South Valley UniversityActive, not recruitingDeterminants of Health-related Quality of Life for Patients After Renal Lithotripsy: PNL Versus RIRSHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Institute of Oncology LjubljanaUnknownHealth-related Quality of LifeSlovenia
Clinical Trials on Minimally invasive pit-picking surgery
-
dr. IJM Han-GeurtsUMC Utrecht; Albert Schweitzer Hospital; Flevoziekenhuis; Ziekenhuis Amstelland; Proctos... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingPilonidal Sinus | Pilonidal Disease | Pilonidal Sinus of Natal Cleft | Pilonidal Sinus Without Abscess | Pilonidal Disease of Natal Cleft
-
Istituto Clinico HumanitasFondazione Umberto VeronesiRecruiting
-
University of OuluRecruitingEndometriosis | Surgery | Deep EndometriosisFinland
-
National Taiwan University HospitalCompletedColorectal Cancer | AdhesionTaiwan
-
October 6 UniversityCompleted
-
Yarmouk UniversityCompletedMinimally Invasive Surgery | Hydatid Disease | Spleen-Preserving Surgery | Echinococcus Granulosus InfectionJordan
-
Hospital del MarEnrolling by invitationGallbladder CancerSpain
-
Giresun UniversityCompletedPostoperative Pain | Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedure | Patient Discharge | Lateral Malleolus FractureTurkey
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyActive, not recruitingUterine Cervical NeoplasmChina
-
Yonsei UniversityRecruiting