- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05993832
Word Learning in Deaf Children Using Eye-tracking and Behavioral Measures
Study Overview
Detailed Description
The investigators will investigate how deaf children prioritize input cues to word meaning when linguistic cues (i.e. mutual exclusivity) and referential gaze are in conflict in a structured word learning task.
Participants: Deaf children (n=40) ages 18 to 60 months are eligible to participate. Investigators will recruit 60 children to allow for 33% attrition. While the inclusion criteria are the same as other studies, here investigators do use spoken language exposure as a grouping variable, as follows: based on responses to the language background questionnaire regarding exposure to spoken English, participants will be grouped according to language use as monolingual ASL or bimodal bilingual (spoken English/ASL). Participants will be identified as bimodal bilingual is 1) the primary caregiver reports spoken English to communicate with their child (either alone or in conjunction with ASL), and 2) the primary caregiver reports that their child's ability to understand spoken English is at least a 3 on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0-5. Parents in this group will complete the short-form English CDI in addition to the ASL language measures.
Procedure: Participants will sit across a table from an experimenter who will present pairs of objects--one familiar, one novel--with one pair in each of nine trials (three per condition). The experimenter will prompt the participant to give them one of the toys, signing "I WANT YOU-GIVE-ME WHAT?" Then the experimenter will provide a cue; the child's selection will be recorded. In the gaze condition, the cue will be a gaze shift to the familiar object. In the mutual exclusivity condition, the cue will be a novel sign. In the conflict condition, both a gaze shift to the familiar object and a novel sign will be used. The trial order and object pair will be pseudo-randomly assigned.
Planned analysis: Investigators will use an omnibus mixed effects binomial model to determine how well condition and language environment predict the likelihood to select the novel object, with item and child as random factors.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
- Boston University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Deaf children ages 18-60 months
- born severely to profoundly deaf
- have either deaf or hearing parents
- communicate using American Sign Language
- have normal to corrected normal vision
Exclusion Criteria:
- Deaf children who have not been exposed to American Sign Language
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Word learning from referential cues
All participants are provided pairs of objects (one familiar, one novel) with an accompanying prompt.
The prompt types are 1) gaze (3 trials); 2) mutual exclusivity (3 trials); or 3) conflict (3 trials)
|
The object is labelled with 1) gaze only; 2) novel label only; or 3) conflicting gaze and novel label
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Novel Object Selected
Time Frame: Trial time frame: 10 seconds, beginning from the end of the experimenter's prompt, i.e. once the experimenter asked the child for an object, the child had 10 seconds to respond by selecting one of the two presented objects.
|
In each trial two objects are presented to the child, one novel and one familiar, along with one of three prompt types.
Children select one of the two objects on the table in front of them by picking it up and handing it to the experimenter.
One each trial, the selected object is scored as novel or familiar based on which object is selected.
Data is analyzed as proportion of trials on which the novel object was selected.
|
Trial time frame: 10 seconds, beginning from the end of the experimenter's prompt, i.e. once the experimenter asked the child for an object, the child had 10 seconds to respond by selecting one of the two presented objects.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amy Lieberman, PhD, Boston University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 4067E
- R01DC015272 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.