Comparison of Non-Invasive Respiratory Monitoring System (RMS)

March 23, 2026 updated by: Michael Chu

Makani Science Respiration Monitoring System Pivotal Clinical Study Protocol

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the performance of a novel non-invasive respiratory monitoring system against the gold standard methods (manual counting) in healthy human subjects. The main question it aims to answer is whether the novel monitoring system comparable to the current standards.

Participants will be asked to breath normally and according to a number of different procedure while wearing both monitors.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Between age of 22-99
  2. BMI between 15 and 35 kg/m^2

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Medical history of serious cardiac or pulmonary diseases/conditions.
  2. History of serious skin irritation caused by medical adhesives (tape).
  3. Cannot lay still on your back for one (1) hour.
  4. Pregnancy.
  5. Unable to give written informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Device Arm
Non-invasive Respiratory Monitoring System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory Rate Accuracy Between the Respiratory Monitoring System and Manual Counting by a Trained Professional for the Supine Position
Time Frame: 2 hours
Respiratory rate is measured concurrently by the respiratory monitoring system and by manual counting performed by a trained professional while the subject was in the supine position. For each paired measurement, the percent difference is calculated. The root mean square percent error (RMSE) is then calculated across all paired supine measurements for all subjects. The RMSE is calculated by taking the square root of the average of the squared percent differences between each measured value from the respiratory monitroing system and its corresponding reference value from the manual counting.The 95% confidence intervals is calculated for the RMSE.
2 hours
Respiratory Rate Accuracy Between the Respiratory Monitoring System and Manual Counting by a Trained Professional for the Recline Position
Time Frame: 2 hours
Respiratory rate is measured concurrently by the respiratory monitoring system and by manual counting performed by a trained professional while the subject is in the recline position. For each paired measurement, the percent difference is calculated. The root mean square percent error (RMSE) is then calculated across all paired recline measurements for all subjects. The RMSE is calculated by taking the square root of the average of the squared percent differences between each measured value from the respiratory monitroing system and its corresponding reference value from the manual counting.The 95% confidence intervals is calculated for the RMSE.
2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory Rate Bias Between the Respiratory Monitoring System and Manual Counting by a Trained Professional for the Supine Position
Time Frame: 2 hours
Respiratory rate is measured concurrently by the respiratory monitoring system and by manual counting performed by a trained professional while the subject is in the supine position. For each paired measurement, the percent bias is calculated across all paired supine measurements for all subjects. Bias can be interpreted as the geometric mean of the paired relative differences between Makani RMS and manual counting. The 95% confidence intervals is calculated for the bias.
2 hours
Respiratory Rate Bias Between the Respiratory Monitoring System and Manual Counting by a Trained Professional for the Recline Position
Time Frame: 2 hours
Respiratory rate is measured concurrently by the respiratory monitoring system and by manual counting performed by a trained professional while the subject is in the recline position. For each paired measurement, the percent bias is calculated across all paired recline measurements for all subjects. Bias can be interpreted as the geometric mean of the paired relative differences between Makani RMS and manual counting. The 95% confidence intervals is calculated for the bias.
2 hours
Respiratory Rate Precision Between the Respiratory Monitoring System and Manual Counting by a Trained Professional for the Supine Position
Time Frame: 2 hours
Respiratory rate is measured concurrently by the respiratory monitoring system and by manual counting performed by a trained professional while the subject is in the supine position. For each paired measurement, the percent precision is calculated across all paired supine measurements for all subjects. Precision can be interpreted as the standard deviation of the relative paired differences. The 95% confidence intervals is calculated for the precision.
2 hours
Respiratory Rate Precision Between the Respiratory Monitoring System and Manual Counting by a Trained Professional for the Recline Position
Time Frame: 2 hours
Respiratory rate is measured concurrently by the respiratory monitoring system and by manual counting performed by a trained professional while the subject is in the recline position. For each paired measurement, the percent precision is calculated across all paired recline measurements for all subjects. Precision can be interpreted as the standard deviation of the relative paired differences. The 95% confidence intervals is calculated for the precision.
2 hours

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subgroup Analysis Results of Respiration Rate Accuracy by BMI for Supine Position
Time Frame: 2 hours
Respiratory rate measurements obtained in the supine position (from the primary outcome) will be stratified by subject BMI category (normal: BMI < 25; overweight: BMI ≥ 25). The root mean square percent error (RMSPE) will be calculated separately for each BMI category, and a randomization test will be used to assess whether RMSPE differs between the two BMI groups. A total of 23 participants has measurements in the supine position; 16 of the participants had normal BMI and 7 of the participants had overweight BMI.
2 hours
Subgroup Analysis Results of Respiration Rate Accuracy by BMI for Recline Position
Time Frame: 2 hours
Respiratory rate measurements obtained in the recline position (from the primary outcome) will be stratified by subject BMI category (normal: BMI < 25; overweight: BMI ≥ 25). The root mean square percent error (RMSPE) will be calculated separately for each BMI category, and a randomization test will be used to assess whether RMSPE differs between the two BMI groups. A total of 25 participants has measurements in the recline position; 18 of the participants had normal BMI and 7 of the participants had overweight BMI.
2 hours
Subgroup Analysis Results of Respiration Rate Bias by BMI for Supine Position
Time Frame: 2 hours
Respiratory rate measurements obtained in the supine position (from the primary outcome) will be stratified by subject BMI category (normal: BMI < 25; overweight: BMI ≥ 25). The bias will be calculated separately for each BMI category. Bias can be interpreted as the geometric mean of the paired relative differences between Makani RMS and manual counting. A total of 23 participants has measurements in the supine position; 16 of the participants had normal BMI and 7 of the participants had overweight BMI. No statistical test was performed here.
2 hours
Subgroup Analysis Results of Respiration Rate Bias by BMI for Recline Position
Time Frame: 2 hours
Respiratory rate measurements obtained in the recline position (from the primary outcome) will be stratified by subject BMI category (normal: BMI < 25; overweight: BMI ≥ 25). The bias will be calculated separately for each BMI category. Bias can be interpreted as the geometric mean of the paired relative differences between Makani RMS and manual counting. A total of 25 participants has measurements in the recline position; 18 of the participants had normal BMI and 7 of the participants had overweight BMI. No statistical test was performed here.
2 hours
Subgroup Analysis Results of Respiration Rate Precision by BMI for Supine Position
Time Frame: 2 hours
Respiratory rate measurements obtained in the supine position (from the primary outcome) will be stratified by subject BMI category (normal: BMI < 25; overweight: BMI ≥ 25). The precision will be calculated separately for each BMI category. Precision can be interpreted as the standard deviation of the relative paired differences. A total of 23 participants has measurements in the supine position; 16 of the participants had normal BMI and 7 of the participants had overweight BMI. No statistical test was performed here.
2 hours
Subgroup Analysis Results of Respiration Rate Precision by BMI for Recline Position
Time Frame: 2 hours
Respiratory rate measurements obtained in the recline position (from the primary outcome) will be stratified by subject BMI category (normal: BMI < 25; overweight: BMI ≥ 25). The precision will be calculated separately for each BMI category. Precision can be interpreted as the standard deviation of the relative paired differences. A total of 25 participants has measurements in the recline position; 18 of the participants had normal BMI and 7 of the participants had overweight BMI. No statistical test was performed here.
2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 29, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 29, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MAKANI-002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Monitoring

Clinical Trials on Makani Science Respiratory Monitoring System

Subscribe