CAR20(NAP)-T Therapy for B Cell Lymphoma (CARMA-01 Study) (CARMA-01)

May 7, 2024 updated by: Uppsala University

A Phase I/IIa Multicenter Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of CAR20(NAP)-T in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Lymphoma (CARMA-01 Study)

The purpose is to study the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of CAR20(NAP)-T for patients with B-cell malignancies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A cancer patient's T cells can be isolated and engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), which re-directs the T cells to recognize and kill tumor cells expressing that particular antigen. CD19-targeted CAR-T cell therapy has shown good effects for B cell malignancies, even cure, in otherwise therapy refractory patients.

Antigen escape, i.e., the downregulation of the antigen targeted by the CAR due to the selective pressure caused by the CAR-T cell therapy is a challenge. For patients treated with CD19 CAR-T cell therapy, about 30% of the patients are resistant to treatment and about 20% of patients relapse after an initial response.

CAR20(NAP)-T cells target CD20 and upon target recognition secrete a bacterial-derived pluripotent immune-stimulating factor named NAP (Helicobacter pylori Neutrophil-activating protein). Secretion of NAP in the tumor microenvironment can induce an endogenous bystander immune response, that counteracts antigen escape and thereby improves the therapeutic outcome.

CAR20(NAP)-T is an investigational agent not yet approved by authorities.

Design:

The study is designed as 3+3 dose escalation phase I, and a dose expansion Phase IIa. The safety, tolerability, PK/PD, and efficacy will be evaluated.Dose escalation is to be based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLTs). The investigator or sub-investigator will decide if the AE is related to IMP-treatment on a case-by-case basis depending on the character of the DLT symptoms. Investigator or sub-investigator has a possibility to classify various toxicity observed in patient as DLT.The Recommended phase II dose (RP2D) is decided based on safety, PK/PD data as well as preliminary clinical activity data from the Phase I dose escalation. After setting the RP2D, additional patients will be treated at RP2D to make sure at least 6 patients will be treated at RP2D dose level already at the phase I part.

Protocol treatment:

The enrolled patient will undergo a leukapheresis procedure to harvest enough T cells for IMP production. During CAR20(NAP)-T manufacturing, the patient may receive bridging therapy to control tumor burden. All patients will receive pre-conditioning chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine) followed by one dose of CAR20(NAP)-T cell infusion intravenously. The patient will then be followed by doctor/study nurse for evaluation of the health status and side effects. At follow-up visits, blood samples will be obtained and CT imaging will be performed. Patient will actively participate in the study for about 24 months when the final follow-up visit will be scheduled.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

18

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Karolinska University Hospital
      • Uppsala, Sweden
        • Recruiting
        • Uppsala University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Gunilla Enblad
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gunilla Enblad, MD/PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent.
  • Relapsed or refractory CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma or indolent lymphoma.
  • The patient should have been treated with at least two lines of therapy and have no curative treatment option, specifically

    • Relapsed or refractory CD20+ B-cell lymphoma that are not eligible to receive clinically approved CD19-directed CAR T cell treatment.
    • Relapsed or refractory CD20+ B-cell lymphoma who are CD19 negative.
    • Relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma who relapse after CD19 CAR T cell treatment.
  • In phase I age >18 years, in phase II all ages
  • Measurable disease per Lugano classification.
  • Performance status ECOG 0-2.
  • Adequate bone marrow function as evidenced by:

    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1x10^9/l/L
    • Platelet ≥ 50x 10^9/l
    • Absolute lymphocyte count ≥ 0,1x10^9/L
  • Adequate renal, hepatic, cardiac, and pulmonary function as evidenced by:

    • Creatinine clearance (Cockcroft Gault) ≥ 30 mL/min
    • Serum Alanine aminotransferase/Aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) ≤ 2.5 Upper limit of normal (ULN) and S-Bilirubin <1.5x UNL
    • Cardiac ejection fraction ≥ 40%
  • Functional venous for administration of IMP.
  • Fertile individuals must consent to use contraceptives during participation in the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other CD20-positive lymphomas i.e Burkitt lymphoma, primary CNS lymphoma, plasmablastic lymphoma or CLL transformed to DLBCL/HGBL (Richter transformation)
  • Any significant medical or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subject from giving informed consent or from following the study procedures.
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
  • Impending organ-compromising disease.
  • Rapidly progressing disease
  • Active and/or severe infection (e.g., tuberculosis, sepsis and opportunistic infections, active hepatitis B virus (HBV) or active hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
  • Other serious underlying medical conditions, which, in the Investigator's judgment, could impair the ability of the subject to perform the treatment.
  • Treatment with an investigational product within 30 days prior to enrolment
  • Potential sign of hypersensitivity reaction to tocilizumab or any of the agents used in this study
  • Systemic corticosteroid treatment (>10mg/day) <5 days prior to IMP treatment or <7 days prior leukapheresis.
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment
CAR20(NAP)-T treatment
Autologous CAR-T cells targeting CD20 and upon target recognition express and secrete NAP
Other Names:
  • ELC-301
pre-conditioning chemotherapy
pre-conditioning chemotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of dose limiting toxicity
Time Frame: First infusion up to 30 days
The incidence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) Defined as Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
First infusion up to 30 days
Adverse events
Time Frame: 24 months
The nature, frequency, severity, and tolerability of adverse events (AEs) including clinically significant laboratory data, and their relation to dosage.
24 months
Pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK)
Time Frame: Either 24 month or 15 years during long-term follow up if clinically indicated
PD is assessed by determine circulating B cell level; PK is assessed by determine circulating CAR20(NAP)-T cells.
Either 24 month or 15 years during long-term follow up if clinically indicated

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective response rate [ORR]
Time Frame: 24 months
ORR is defined as the incidence of a complete response or a partial response by the revised Lugano classification as determined by the study investigators. All patients that do not meet the criteria for an objective response by the analysis cutoff date will be considered non-responders.
24 months
Progression free survival [PFS]
Time Frame: 24 months
PFS is defined as the time from the IMP treatment date to the date of disease progression per the revised Lugano classification or death from any cause.
24 months
Best Objective Response
Time Frame: 24 months
the incidence of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), or unevaluable (UE) as best response to treatment.
24 months
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: 24 months
DOR is defined as the date of their first objective response (which is subsequently confirmed) to disease progression per the revised Lugano classification or death regardless of cause. Patients not meeting the criteria for progression or death by the analysis data cutoff date will be censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date and their response will be noted as ongoing.
24 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: either 24 months or 15 years during long-term follow up if clinically indicated
defined as the time from IMP treatment to the date of death. Patients alive by the analysis data cutoff date will be censored at their last contact date. The overall survival rate will be reported at different cut-off time points.
either 24 months or 15 years during long-term follow up if clinically indicated

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anti-NAP response
Time Frame: either 24 months or 15 years during long-term follow up if clinically indicated
Determine anti-NAP immune response
either 24 months or 15 years during long-term follow up if clinically indicated
Bystander immunity activation
Time Frame: either 24 months or 15 years during long-term follow up if clinically indicated
Assess induced tumor specific endogenous T-cell immune response
either 24 months or 15 years during long-term follow up if clinically indicated

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Di Yu, PhD, Uppsala University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on B-cell Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on CAR20(NAP)-T

Subscribe